Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Airport Consolidation Needed!

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Airport Consolidation Needed!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th May 2013, 19:29
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,944
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Adding to VentureGo's rant plan to close DTVA I don't see a need for Newcastle either. Newcastles site would make a good high value houseing estate.
N707ZS is offline  
Old 15th May 2013, 19:31
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,641
Received 102 Likes on 71 Posts
Under the scheme do we really need Newcastle either. Why not just have Edinburgh and Manchester.
What scheme? And if there was one, yes - EDI and MAN are miles away (everywhere is miles away from Newcastle....)

DTV has more open land and potential than newcastle..logically developing DTV would be better and more cost effective than developing newcastle dont you think?
No - what are you going to develop at DTVA which either doesn't already exist or couldn't be developed cheaper/easier at NCL (and by the way, the market is at NCL...)
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 15th May 2013, 20:27
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,944
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Its fun to see the heckles come up!
N707ZS is offline  
Old 15th May 2013, 21:02
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Durham
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
N707ZS -
Adding to VentureGo's rant plan to close DTVA I don't see a need for Newcastle either. Newcastles site would make a good high value houseing estate.
p.s. No "e" in "Housing"

Careful! - There's no rant about DTVA closure. The assumption from the Airports shown (IF there was to be consolidation!! and it's a big IF!) is that the airports close to the centre of the largest regional centres would survive... Surely you're not suggesting DTVA is better located in a field east of Darlington & miles from Middlesbrough with No Infrastructure and .... No Customers.. is in a privileged position to expand to 5-6+ million passengers in the next few years... from less than half a million. Even the owners (Peel) don't want the airport... They've undergone a massive U-Turn in their comments; only following political pressure.
This is not about the NCL vs MME but all regional airports and infrastructure outside London & South East.

PAXBOY & SWBKCB make some good points

Last edited by VentureGo; 15th May 2013 at 21:20.
VentureGo is offline  
Old 15th May 2013, 22:18
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,858
Received 217 Likes on 102 Posts
Its fun to see the heckles come up!
Particularly when you consider that the original article we're debating was pure kite-flying.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 16th May 2013, 13:26
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: leeds
Age: 77
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was brought up on Doganis and Thompson which said minimum efficient scale was 3m units ( annual passengers plus tonnes of freight). That's old now but maybe it still gives an indication. In which case, I'm with FairdealFrank, supposing a few more years of low growth, will there come a moment when some of them are just not good enough on current cost accounting or the replacement investment is unaffordable? Or the land is more valuable for something else. But even if one or two minnows do drop out or cut back, this issue is being raised 50 years too late. We are where we are, a spot of marginal adjustment maybe, wholesale consolidation no chance.
anothertyke is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.