Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Backward Facing Seats ?

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Backward Facing Seats ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Feb 2013, 18:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wales
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Backward Facing Seats ?

Hi, I don't know if this is the right place to ask this question, but....

Has any thought ever been given to having passenger seats facing backwards?

This would be much the better position to be in should
the aircraft have any sort of accident.
phiggsbroadband is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 18:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably a less efficient use of space and would it really be allowed for safety reasons?

Plus, I think I few people would have a bit of a roller coaster ride on take-off
FRatSTN is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 18:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Scotland, ATCO
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
British Airways Club World has rear facing seats, in fact in think they are better for comfort than front facing seats!
121decimal375 is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 18:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Row 1 on the BA Trident fleet were rear facing seats. Travelled on them a number of times and when looking down the aisle to the rear of the aircraft on take-off, gave an impressive sight of the rate of climb.

One reason for airlines not persuing rearward facing seats I believe, is they were not popular with passengers although it was quite common, if not mandatory, for military trooping flights.
TSR2 is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 18:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: inv
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 2 Posts
Some of the Loganair SAABs have a rear facing seat seat 1D
scr1 is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 18:51
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cape Town / UK / Europe
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some of FlymayBe's aircraft have rearfacing front seats, or used to have, I remember doing JER-LCY once on one. Quite appropriate for an airline that doesn't know whether it's coming or going.
Tableview is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 19:03
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Old Warden
Age: 87
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The RAF had/has rear facing seats on some of it's passenger transport aircraft

Last edited by goudie; 15th Feb 2013 at 19:04.
goudie is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 19:05
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,587
Received 94 Likes on 64 Posts
Probably a less efficient use of space and would it really be allowed for safety reasons?
FRatSTN - how is it a less efficient use of space? less safe?

For many years all RAF transports had rear facing seats. Definitely safer but the paying public don't like it. Always makes me laugh when you get the po-faced airline spokesman saying "safety is our primary concern"
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 19:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North, UK
Age: 67
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How could it be a less efficient use of space, surely it would be exactly the same, just facing back instead of forward or have I missed something?
pwalhx is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 19:39
  #10 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,152
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
This topic has been raised a couple of times during my time in these forums, particularly in SLF forum. So the search function might find some.

In short, it is the take off that people are said to not like. But I think a bigger problem is that - if a carrier decides to switch to rear facing for saftey reasons (which seem well founded) Pas will be asking, "Why did you not do this 30 years ago? You don't care about us do you?" and similar.

For myself, I did travel once in the Trident with rear facing during an experiment in the mid-70s and I filled in a response form saying that I thought it was fine.

I do not expect any carrier to introduce this wholesale.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 19:40
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Derby
Age: 68
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe that one of the Dan Air 727s (those were the days) had backward facing seats
mikerawsonderby is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 19:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how is it a less efficient use of space? less safe?
It depends. It wouldn't be less efficient it they all faced to the rear, it would of course be the same.

But if like a train with some forward facing and some backwards, it may reduce space because there would need to be a bigger gap between facing seats for two sets of legroom.

Seats that were back-to-back, would still need the space to recline and would be naturally spaced a little anyway because the backrest is never quite vertical.

By all facing the same way, the recline or backrest angle of the seat can overlap the legroom space. With some seats facing forward and some backwards, they can't.

As for safety, that was just another suggestion as to maybe why airlines don't tend to install rear facing seats.
FRatSTN is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 20:00
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: BHX
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DanAir used to have rear facing seats on the B15's, the rows at the overwing exits faced each other. You had to hope you got an attractive member of the opposite sex facing you as the leg room was so small you couldn't help playing footsie, if you were both 6ft + that would be kneesie
groundhogbhx is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 20:30
  #14 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,152
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
It is said that the rear facing is safer in sudden deceleration. However, no carrier or country Air Authority has mandated it. So it must be a marginal benefit. I guess that they have looked at prangs in, say, a ten year span and seen how many pax might have benefitted from rear facing in sudden deceleration.

One must conclude - not many.

Last edited by PAXboy; 16th Feb 2013 at 10:14. Reason: typographical
PAXboy is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 20:46
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: in a hotel
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i believe that past studies into this have determined the there would also be a weight penalty too. the seat backs would have to be stronger to withstand the extra loads on them in an accident.
munster is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 21:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Darkest Lincs
Posts: 544
Received 102 Likes on 59 Posts
Having flown in rear facing BA club world seats, I never experienced any issues [although I hate rear facing seats in a train]. Take-off was somewhat strange, but more because of the novelty factor than any sensory problem.
However, I believe that most slf prefer to face the direction of travel, even if they cannot see 'where' they are going.
wowzz is online now  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 23:28
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: cornwall, uk
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DH8-300s had the first row as rear facing
cornishsimon is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2013, 00:52
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockport
Age: 84
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
40 years ago or thereabouts BEA had rear-facing seats at the front of the cabin in their Trident 2 fleet and forward-facing seats towards the back. i cannot remember where the changeover was, but I guess that it was at a door.

My main recollection is that on takeoff you felt as if you were suspended by your seatbelt, which could be a little uncomfortable. Otherwise there was no real difference of sensation between the two directions.
Dairyground is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2013, 01:32
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Deep South
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some BUA 1-11s in the late 60s had all rear facing seats as they were used also for military contracts.
macuser is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2013, 01:59
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Clare
Age: 53
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have been on the old Ryanair BAC 1- 11's rear facing (with the small table between forward facing seats) without any issues but a few years ago on Aer Arann ATR's the sensation was awful and all I wanted to do was pee!
Club World inflight was fine but prefer forward facing for takeoff and landing.
bannercounty is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.