Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Small airports, big security hassles

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Small airports, big security hassles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Feb 2012, 19:37
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wales
Age: 62
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't blame the airports, blame the Government.

The Department of Transport consistantly refuse to meet with Airport Authorities to discuss what is common sense and what is not, simply because if, for example, they allowed water pistols to be carried on board, there is a possibility that said item could be filled with noxcious liquid and used to threaten crew. They wouldn't accept that if said pistols were proven to be empty prior to boarding, they wouldnt be a threat, because no one has proved that this would be infallible.

All airports have to follow the same Government guide lines, they guidelines are so vague that there is massive interperation to be had by indiviual organisations.
There are childrens toy guns which are so like the real thing, in a heated moment it's difficult to tell them from the real thing - faced with it at your head or that of a loved one, who would argue? With basic training, such as hand to hand combat skills taught by the Military, I could kill you with a pebble in my fist. A sobering thought and exactly what these people have to take into account, although I whole heartedly agree that they shouldn't have to.

Take it up with your MP and see how far you get.
yates is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2012, 21:31
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ yates

Don't blame the airports, blame the Government.
Why?..Did they smash aircraft into the Twin towers that made all this extra security necessary.

Yes it's inconvenient..Better than the inconvenience of being blown out the the sky, because proper checks had not been made.
Ernest Lanc's is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2012, 21:44
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ABZshire
Age: 66
Posts: 99
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Aero Mad,

"
Security staff may know the passenger, but what of the "stranger" in the queue behind you...."
sorry too subtle maybe, but the Security slaves are watched and tested and very aware of the possibility of dft testing , today a pebble, tomorrow an island so to speak
As Yates says "Don't blame the airports, blame the Government." his post is spot on.
A Haggis in a sporran could also be considered a weapon, its the Goverment experts who decide the criteria

Ah the TPCA & MPA ,memories of 30 years past as a probationer and then as now always interested in the current situation, so dont shoot the messenger old boy.

xraydice is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2012, 22:05
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clear as can be - You may not be able to take a pebble, but you can take breast milk through security;;

Blaming HM Government - Humbug.

Dangerous and restricted items: what you cannot take on board an aircraft : Directgov - Travel and transport

Air travel hand baggage rules : Directgov - Travel and transport

EDIT:
Not just the UK.
We has a nice small collection of shells we had picked up off the beach in Costa Rica and they were confiscated by the authorities at the airport in Liberia.
Does anyone bring home sand, sea shells, and pebbles as momentos - Page 2 - Cruise Critic Message Boards
Ernest Lanc's is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 12:20
  #25 (permalink)  

A Runyonesque Character
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The South of France ... Not
Age: 74
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The airlines (on behalf of their passengers) argue for a risk-based approach to security. That is to say, the consequences of a Scotsman going berserk on a small aeroplane with an outsize pebble in his sock might be considerable, but the risk of it happening is negligible.

But there again, on 10th September 2001, the risk of terrorists taking control of four airliners and flying three of them into public buildings would have been perceived as negligible. Therein lies the dilemma.
The SSK is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 12:54
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The M77...
Age: 41
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once, not long after September 11, a friend of mine tried to take a cigarette lighter shaped like a bullet ( one of the several items of tat given to us by a major nightclub) through security at Palma airport. You can imagine the hilarity that ensued...
The Hypnoboon is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2012, 16:22
  #27 (permalink)  
None but a blockhead
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London, UK
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not whether the general level of airport security is too onerous (for the record, I think it's far too OTT and agree with Bruce Schneier about it being theatre rather than effective or necessary) but whether some of the small island airports are even worse than that.

It seems as if they could well be. Which is a shame - and yes, it'll be CalMac for me when I get the choice. (Although their onboard catering is a terror weapon in itself.) Next time, I'll make sure to pack my geological specimens (including anything particularly interesting from Yesnaby) away from prying eyes.
Self Loading Freight is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2012, 13:34
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere
Age: 41
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Typical small airport syndrome, some get it right, most don't. You want to try being air crew, they love to make an example of you and tear shreds off you!
redED is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2012, 16:36
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we should be using the resources to target certain types of people

Of course we should !

Trouble is that plays straight into the hands of those who scream about racism and victimisation. As long as those folk are listened to, things will stay as they are.
vulcanised is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.