Domestic flights cut by a quater!
Thread Starter
Domestic flights cut by a quater!
Could this be a sign of things to come?
How will higher pax duty tax and more high speed rail lines change the domestic flight industry??
I know these things will take several years to impliment, but take the long term view of 5-10 years??
Domestic flights cut by a quarter - Telegraph
How will higher pax duty tax and more high speed rail lines change the domestic flight industry??
I know these things will take several years to impliment, but take the long term view of 5-10 years??
Domestic flights cut by a quarter - Telegraph
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The question then becomes...why would someone (anyone) consider domestic flights in the UK, when, with just a little effort and forethought, more pleasant destinations elsewhere are within reach...and perhaps cheaper?
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The question then becomes...why would someone (anyone) consider domestic flights in the UK, when, with just a little effort and forethought, more pleasant destinations elsewhere are within reach...and perhaps cheaper?
It's a basic economic theory, not too complicated I trust.
I know you're based in the US but I think there are a lot of websites that you could use if you really want to find out about our country and how it operates. It's good to learn isn't it?
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What does that say about the 3.000.000 or so visitors to the UK from the USA each year that chose the UK over more pleasant destinations?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Belfast, UK
Age: 43
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Liberal Democrats have called for the imposition of a higher rate of duty on domestic flights, claiming that an "alternative and less polluting" method of travel is "readily available".
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No doubt, to remind them of why they (or their relatives) left in the first place...
Wheest yourself will you not?
Meanwhile back on topic :
There are a load of domestic routes where there is no realistic alternative. I must admit the hoo hah that HS2 is kicking up as thousands realise that they're about to have miles of high speed rail and trains thundering past their unspoilt views of the countryside. Suddenly a third runway at Heathrow and one village moved doesn't seem such a bad idea. That's not GREEN though, unlike digging up hundreds of miles of countryside and adding to the car crash of costs that is the Operator / Network Rail fiasco that passes for a railway in the UK. Not that quiet a high speed train....
I wonder if Huhne is going to build a railway bridge across the Irish Sea!
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South East
Age: 56
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's funny how the Green lobby omit the point about cutting swathes of countryside, the cost of producing the track in enviro terms. The cost to run these trains and produce the electricity needed to power them (something like 1000 kettles worth of power each time 'a' train pulls out of the station).
That aside, with costs potentially rising by 40% on the rail network as the Government look to reduce the 50% subsidy . Domestic Air travel is still very attractive. The rail network can take the load by moving passengers to regional Airports for quick processing and overall travel time.
That aside, with costs potentially rising by 40% on the rail network as the Government look to reduce the 50% subsidy . Domestic Air travel is still very attractive. The rail network can take the load by moving passengers to regional Airports for quick processing and overall travel time.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the flightpath
Age: 61
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
People who go on about there being no need for domestic flights are often London-focussed, and unaware that there are actually domestic flights in the UK that serve points other than London. High speed rail from London to Birmingham will not replace any domestic flights, as there are none from any London airport to Birmingham; once the HS rail line reaches Manchester, it will still not replace the need for London-Manchester flights. The rail line will take people from city centre to city centre, which is fine if that's where you want to travel from and to; but not a lot of use if you'd prefer to travel from e.g. Windsor to Chester or Horsham to Stockport. Making airports hubs for all means of transport makes more sense - including high speed rail. Brussels Airport has become significantly easier to access since the rail branch line was turned into a through line with long distance services. There will clearly always be a need for domestic air services that cross water to Shetland, Belfast, etc.; but until there is a viable, affordable, convenient and timely alternative surface transport service, I will continue to fly from Edinburgh to Birmingham, Cardiff to Newcastle or Southampton to Manchester.
