Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Virgin/easy/BMI merge possibility

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Virgin/easy/BMI merge possibility

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jun 2010, 20:06
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: another place
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Constant F

The group is going to be pulled together if anything, not merged sold(just yet) or anything else.

The synergies with other airlines will be from Lufthansa group and the star alliance.

The Germans won't let this tommie airline beat them!

D and F
Deep and fast is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2010, 20:19
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Where its at
Age: 40
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Atmosphere

I agree. Adopting Virgin branding is not the same as completing an out and out merger. Maybe this will happen if the dispute with stelios over the easy brand gets ugly (although as he is the majority shareholder, it would be surprising if it came to this).

With regards to Virgin Atlantic, surely if they are forced to merge with another airline it would be a skyteam member given Singapore Airlines stake in the company.

I think it is also worth noting the similarities between the situations at virgin and easy. Virgin might be SRB's baby but it is not his airline, a reality being felt all too painfully by Stelios at the moment.
Anansis is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2010, 05:39
  #23 (permalink)  
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Global Nomad
Age: 55
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a skyteam member given Singapore Airlines stake
Think you mean Star Alliance...

FWIW, I cannot for a single second see any business merit in combining easyJet and Virgin Atlantic. Other deals are much, much more likely and more sensible.

TA
TwinAisle is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2010, 14:14
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Part of the rationale for this debate seems to be the possibility of easyJet losing the right to use 'easy' branding. Why would the airline company want to then sign up to a branding agreement paying royalty fees every year to another company and risk ending up in the same situation in 5 or 10 years time ?

easyJet is no longer a fledgling airline that may go bust any day, but is now a major company earning substantial profits and more than capable of standing on its own two feet.
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2010, 15:16
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Where its at
Age: 40
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think you mean Star Alliance...
You're quite right- my bad

As Davidjohnson06 points out, my opinions on this matter are based on the hypothetical scenario of easyjet losing the right to use the 'easy' brand. I don't believe the outright merger of Virgin, Easyjet and BMI is likely but I am intrigued by the possibility of easyjet rebranding as virgin.

This is not as far fetched as it seems. Virgin Blue in Australia is only 25% owned by the Virgin Group. Their biggest shareholder is Patrick Corporation, who have a 65% stake (according to wikipedia). An identical state of affairs exists in the USA, where Virgin America is only 25% owned by the Virgin Group, the rest being owned by BLack Canyon Capital. Neither airline offers connections to Virgin Atlantic and they all have their own seperate independent corporate structures.

I appreciate that most of what is being written is speculation, but it is informed speculation about something which could possibly happen. However, I'm reasonably certain that neither side in the easyjet dispute would let such a thing happen (though big ego's can often get in the way or reason!)
Anansis is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2010, 21:14
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LHR
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Part of the rationale for this debate seems to be the possibility of easyJet losing the right to use 'easy' branding. Why would the airline company want to then sign up to a branding agreement paying royalty fees every year to another company and risk ending up in the same situation in 5 or 10 years time ?

easyJet is no longer a fledgling airline that may go bust any day, but is now a major company earning substantial profits and more than capable of standing on its own two feet.
And if anything, operating under the Virgin brand under licence would far more restrictive (and expensive) than licensing the Easy same (for which Easyjet pays £1 a year).

I cannot see any form of deal between the three happening. Easyjet should stick to what it does well - low-cost short-haul point to point.

Some form of deal between bmi and Virgin has been mooted for years and nothing has come of it. LH holds all the cards and it should be remembered that its business model is based on feeding traffic into its own hubs at FRA etc. Why would LH want to use its ownership of bmi to enter into some kind of deal with Virgin to divert traffic into Virgin's own network where it doesn't get 100% of the benefit?
LD12986 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2010, 21:08
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: EU
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When Virgin moves into expansion mode again, it will be easier and cheaper at Gatwick than Heathrow. Gatwick is leisure and Heathrow business. The likes of Tui and Thomas Cook are actively booking away from Virgin Holidays/Atlantic, so it makes sense for Virgin to look for a new source of traffic feed. Easy's routes into Gatwick from Eastern Europe could provide a nice source of holidaymakers, looking to try destinations such as Florida and the Caribbean. No need to merge though, but you have to work out how to make the connection work for Easy, i.e. no expensive/complicated interlining and think about what happens if its flight is late and the Virgin connection is missed.
citadel is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2010, 17:26
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LHR
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This presentation on bmi at the LH Investors' Day sets out their strategy for bmi:

http://investor-relations.lufthansa....10-06-28-e.pdf

No mention of any partnerships with other airlines, apart from fellow *A partners.
LD12986 is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2010, 23:28
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Neither airline offers connections to Virgin Atlantic
True but...

Virgin Atlantic sells connection from Sydney with Virgin blue
eagle21 is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2010, 16:44
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: in my own world
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Far as I'm aware SRB owns 51% of VAA... So still his baby, and if rumours are true Singapore wants out?
xray one is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2010, 18:41
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why doesn't a mod place this thread into the spotters corner as it really is where it should be. Not a rumour, neither news!
boris is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.