Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Finnair

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Mar 2007, 10:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Finnair

(one suspects this will also impact flights into Finland that don't connect onto ay)

Finnair will no longer check luggage through to final destinations if passengers' connecting flights are handled by a competitor, reports the daily Helsingin Sanomat.


The decision will affect hundreds of thousands of travellers in Finland each year.

Passengers will have to re-check their luggage in connecting cities, if their connecting flight is not Finnair or one of its partners. For instance, travellers flying with Finnair from Joensuu to Helsinki will have to re-check their bags in Helsinki, if they have a connecting flight with a Finnair competitor. They will also need to go through security checks again.


http://www.yle.fi/news/left/id54597.html
luoto is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2009, 11:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: hong kong
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FINNAIR

FINNAIR 'Fly in the Right Direction" Quote

In Sunday South China Morning Post Magazine a quotation from Kati Ihamaki 'VP of Sustainable Development of Finnair'
"To improve environmental impact Finnair is is investing in a
new fleet.........................
Equally important is fly the shortest way and always in the right
direction "

Is this for real ?????????????
mr Q is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2009, 11:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the Old Folks' Home
Posts: 420
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Lost in Translation

Something has been lost in translation.
Smilin_Ed is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2009, 11:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,654
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Makes sense to me.

Finnair are marketing by making the point that from Asia to Europe you route pretty much over Finland anyway, and a connection there is not too much of a dog-leg.

There are an increasing number of itineraries for pax nowadays which are offered on surprisingly indirect routes, most notably from or in the US, where the concept that a carrier's limited number of hubs can offer anywhere-to-anywhere journeys means I have met those who journeyed New York to London through Charlotte NC, Albany NY to Washington through Detroit, Seattle to London through Dallas, and a range of other grossly excessive mileage routes.

Presumably Finnair are aiming at passengers being sold routings from Hong Kong to Northern Europe through the Gulf.

OK, point covered, this one can go to the passenger forum now.
WHBM is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2009, 11:45
  #5 (permalink)  
airfoilmod
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Paraphrasing

In other words "you can get there through here." Ah, Capitalism. Not that there's anything wrong with it.
 
Old 7th Jan 2009, 12:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: the edge of madness
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and, say, two six hour sectors in an A330 with a tech stop would burn less fuel than non-stop 11 hours with e.g 777 carrying full sector fuel - therefore more environmentally friendly?
Torquelink is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2009, 16:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: above it all
Posts: 367
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another example here: Finnish passengers can sometimes get a reasonably good deal to fly from Finland to China on Lufthansa, which means flying Helsinki-Frankfurt first and back again over Finland to China. Or, on British Airways, Helsinki-London first and back over Finland again. Makes sense for the pax perhaps, saving some money, but it also means an extra 6 to 8 hours of wasted time easily and doesn´t sound too good from an environmental point of view.
Finn47 is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2009, 20:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: southwest
Age: 78
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Torquelink

Just to make it really simple: two 6-hour sectors do burn less fuel than one 12-hour sector on the same plane.
So the A330 would indeed rule the long-haul skies if the environmentalists had their way.

Last edited by Dysag; 7th Jan 2009 at 20:28.
Dysag is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2009, 04:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: 44N 63W
Age: 55
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Finnair operate A340's from HKG to Helsinki.

XV
OldBillXV is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2009, 09:39
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Essex
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I once flew Montreal-Charlotte (including a stop at Pittsburgh)-Gatwick on US Airways because the fare was tempting. United once offered to route me London-San Francisco-Montreal/Toronto (can't remember which) but I gave that one a miss!
Seat62K is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2009, 15:43
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: the edge of madness
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dysag,

Thought so. In fact I read somewhere a Rolls-Royce boffin saying that if airlines wanted to reduce long haul fuel burn by 15 - 20% at a stroke, just introduce tech stops (assuming not over water sector - clearly!).
Torquelink is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2009, 15:47
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: on the road...
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excuse the ignorance from SLF but why does a plane burn less fuel on two 6hr sectors compared to a single 12hr? Surely the additional takeoff and landing use more fuel than cruising along happily at altitude?!
Angry Rebel is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2009, 12:48
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: the edge of madness
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry,

In fact, more fuel is burned just to carry the weight of the non-stop fuel than is used making a refuelling stop. And if you then use a shorter range aircraft which will be structurally lighter with smaller engines etc, you reduce the fuel burn even more. So while aircraft are being designed with longer and longer (9.000 nm+) range, they are becoming relatively less and less fuel efficient compared to aircraft using the same technologies (light weight materials etc) designed for shorter sectors. Of course, making tech stops is more inefficient in terms of crewing, maintenance costs and user charges so it isn't necessarily more cost efficient overall than non stop.
Torquelink is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2009, 14:33
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That has just turned my little world on it's head. You DO learn something every day....
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2009, 15:43
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Finnair CEO resigns

Finnair CEO Resigns | News | YLE Uutiset | yle.fi

"Finnair President and CEO Jukka Hienonen announced his resignation on Friday. He says he is leaving the job because he is not satisfied with what he has accomplished in the top spot at the national carrier.

Hienonen will continue as Finnair CEO for the time being. His contract specifies a six-month period of notice of resignation.
The board of Finnair has described Hienonen's decision to resign as regrettable.
The company on Friday published bleak second quarter results. Company operations were 32.5 million euros in the red before taxes. Last year, Finnair's second quarter showed a 18.5 million euro profit."
anttimik is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2009, 14:48
  #16 (permalink)  

A Runyonesque Character
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The South of France ... Not
Age: 74
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I hear (from a very well informed source) that he is simply fed up with the unions blocking every move he is trying to make to turn the airline around. He just doesn't need the hassle, so he's walked.
The SSK is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2009, 19:40
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SSK: You are correct here.
luoto is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 15:14
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: europe
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Hienonen told this morning in finnish broadcasting company's interview that he's piss off for pilots outstanding virtues. Here is some list.

* Room booking delay -> Extra holiday for every 30min
* Room share for another crew member -> Extra holiday + 50€ annoyance
* Raiders for food (company will not pay food)
* Sleeping comittee -> Nogo for Narita 5 star Hilton, they travel to center of Tokyo

Don't forget approx. 140000€/year salary

Nice, very nice
mrkerozin is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2009, 11:14
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brighton, England
Age: 43
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why has AY's Manchester route been in decline recently? What effect will easyJet have on AY's competitiveness on the route?

Regards

Mike
aeulad is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2009, 12:05
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I booked MAN-HEL-HKG for November, but the HEL-HKG was cancelled at short notice, with pretty poor communications from AY.
Never flown with AY & the customer service means I never will !
Re-arranged with SWISS via ZRH whose flights were pretty well full both ways.
Mr A Tis is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.