Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Goodbye EOS & MAXJET, Thank you AA!

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Goodbye EOS & MAXJET, Thank you AA!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th May 2008, 19:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: england
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Goodbye EOS & MAXJET, Thank you AA!

Just heard that AA are pulling out of STN because of the high oil price! They are lower than a snakes belly and won't simply admit that they have killed off the competition and are now going back to core business. What a bunch of low life cowards!
in my last airline is offline  
Old 28th May 2008, 19:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: fort sheridan, il
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
maxjet is actually flying again as a very small charter outfit...some pilots have been recalled...not many by any stretch of the imagination.
sevenstrokeroll is offline  
Old 28th May 2008, 19:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: southwest
Age: 78
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
in my last airline

Killing off the competition is what capitalism is all about, unless I've been asleep for the past 200 years...
Dysag is offline  
Old 28th May 2008, 19:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London
Age: 50
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats an interesting angle to come from.
ukdean is offline  
Old 28th May 2008, 20:08
  #5 (permalink)  

A Runyonesque Character
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The South of France ... Not
Age: 74
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Has it occurred to you that with $130 oil and the state of the economy Stansted-New York is not a viable market - not for Maxjet, not for Eos, and not for American?
The SSK is offline  
Old 28th May 2008, 20:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A25R
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not surprising they couldn't make any money out it, knackered old 767's with almost non existent IFE and flights cancelled due every excuse under the sun. As previously mentioned, it was probably never the intention to make money......
autobrake3 is offline  
Old 28th May 2008, 20:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Not here any more.
Posts: 646
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In any case American plays tough.
Used to work for a Caribbean airline, we used to fly MD80's to Puerto Rico from Trinidad via Barbados and Antigua, when American came on the route they put non-stop 727's from each of those destinations until they made it impossible to compete, as soon as we dropped the route the equipment was changed to an ATR 42 and the price raised. Pretty much the same happened on the Caribbean to Miami route, we had five a day, four MD80's and one L1011, eventually dropped to one a day. Subsequently we shut down and restarted at a smaller scale with most of us having to find new jobs.
American is quite the predator, ask the pilots from South and Central America whos airlines failed.
Such are the hard facts of capitalism.
NG_Kaptain is offline  
Old 29th May 2008, 01:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester
Age: 45
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In any case American plays tough.
Used to work for a Caribbean airline, we used to fly MD80's to Puerto Rico from Trinidad via Barbados and Antigua, when American came on the route they put non-stop 727's from each of those destinations until they made it impossible to compete, as soon as we dropped the route the equipment was changed to an ATR 42 and the price raised. Pretty much the same happened on the Caribbean to Miami route, we had five a day, four MD80's and one L1011, eventually dropped to one a day. Subsequently we shut down and restarted at a smaller scale with most of us having to find new jobs.
American is quite the predator, ask the pilots from South and Central America whos airlines failed.
Such are the hard facts of capitalism.
Easy to play tough when you live under the protectionist wing of your Government.

I wonder how American firms would do if they had to survive in the real World with an equal footing with everyone else ??

A World where Chapter 11 didn't exist.

A world where you could ride roughshod over International bilateral treaties....

Thought not, they can't even do it properly now, heaven help them if they let European Airlines in.
Ex Cargo Clown is offline  
Old 29th May 2008, 01:51
  #9 (permalink)  
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
American has never been bankrupt.

And please, point out the bilateral treaty provisions you are referring to.
Huck is offline  
Old 29th May 2008, 04:06
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: US
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if they let European Airlines in.
----------------------------------------

European airlines are in. Open Skies just started. They can fly from any EU city to any US city, right?

If you're referring to the US domestic (intra-US) market, of course we're not interested in letting that happen. US airlines don't fly within any other country's city pairs....so status quo sounds good.

KC135777
KC135777 is offline  
Old 29th May 2008, 05:19
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Protectionist wing of the government ?

The same government that allowed : Pan Am, Eastern, Braniff, Frontier etc, etc to fail doesn't seem that protectionist to me.

Granted they stepped in after 9-11 for unprecedented reason.No one flew four passenger aircraft into buildings in Europe though..


British Airways having their debt basically written off before privatisation while still being able to retain a monopoly of slots at LHR seems a little protectionist..

British Airways purchasing their Concorde's for one Pound each seems a little protectionist..


AA's reputation as cold blooded is well deserved, they did their best to kill off my airline a few years ago, that's Capitalism I suppose..
stilton is offline  
Old 29th May 2008, 07:12
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle
Age: 39
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
American has never been bankrupt
And it never will. Because the US govt. will carry them through nomatter what. Whereas in the rest of the world, if your business model is not working, and you are loosing $$$ there is a good chance you are sh*t out of luck (except Alitalia ),
geordiejet is offline  
Old 29th May 2008, 09:12
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Either the back of a sim, or wherever Crewing send me.
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Kc135777

What about all the Fedex and UPS flights throughout Europe operated on N reg crewed by American's on American licences.

Ex Cargo Clown, we agree about something.
Johnny F@rt Pants is offline  
Old 29th May 2008, 11:50
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I stand to be corrected but don't DL have fifth freedom intra european routes inherited from the Panam takeover, they just choose not to operate them now.
lgwops is offline  
Old 29th May 2008, 15:39
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
That's life in the commercial world. A converse view is that American, BA et al have spent decades building up commercial links between London and New York, and now upstart carriers come along and try to cream off the best of the traffic, and get annoyed if the established operators make any move to compete.

British Airways ....... still being able to retain a monopoly of slots at LHR
Do you not remember that Bermuda, and Bermuda 2, were an AGREEMENT between the UK and US governments. The way it was portrayed latterly was that it was something unilaterally imposed by the UK authorities. One of the aspects of the agreement was that for many years after the agreement there were two US airlines (Pan Am and TWA) and only one UK airline (BA) operating to the US from Heathrow.

And if you think BA have (or even had) a monopoly of Heathrow slots I can only presume you don't come through Heathrow a lot.
WHBM is offline  
Old 29th May 2008, 21:43
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Milan MXP
Age: 48
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
STN is the third airport of London with more of 23 milion of pax last year, so it's incredible don't have now any flight to New York.

For me this gap will be closed soon...
cesare.caldi is offline  
Old 29th May 2008, 23:12
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think this gap will be closed anytime soon. Now CO, AA, MaxJet, Eos have all pulled out there will be no consumer confidence in any airline starting a scheduled service to NYC. That with the out of control oil costs, it aint happening anytime soon.
Confirmed Must Ride is offline  
Old 30th May 2008, 13:48
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK Home Counties
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now CO, AA, MaxJet, Eos have all pulled out there will be no consumer confidence in any airline starting a scheduled service to NYC.
You are unfortunately, correct. And you should now add Silverjet to the depressing list...
CAP493 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.