Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

BA/AA/CO/IB Merger/cooperation (Merged)

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

BA/AA/CO/IB Merger/cooperation (Merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jul 2008, 07:27
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bridgnorth UK
Age: 54
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can only agree with apaddyinuk regarding service levels. IB have been pushing their product downmarket for years and this may not fit well with BA's model. However their product is undoubtably succesful and at times like these, that is what matters.
BAFQTV is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2008, 18:06
  #42 (permalink)  
Too mean to buy a long personal title
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,968
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by apaddyinuk
I feel the greatest problem with this merger would what I personally consider the great difference in customer service.
This is what I find most baffling about this as well. However much BA tries to keep the IB brand separate, ownership will inevitably link IB to BA. At present, you can look at IB service levels, shrug your shoulders, and write it off as an exception to the quality generally found across oneworld. After the merger, it really won't be that easy.
Globaliser is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2008, 15:01
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA/AA tie up on the cards again

From the BBC:


"BA close to American alliance

BA says talks with American Airlines are nearing a conclusion. British Airways says it is hopeful of agreeing a tie-up with its largest US rival American Airlines within weeks.

The talks are taking place alongside negotiations between BA and the Spanish airline Iberia about a possible merger.

With aviation fuel prices at record levels and spending on air travel slowing, airlines are looking for ways to cut costs.

BA suffered an 88% drop in profits between April and June and said the industry faced its worst ever period.

It also said it would cut 3% of flights this winter to reduce overheads.
British Airways and American Airlines already work together as partners in the One World alliance which lets member airlines share flight capacity and airport facilities.

But it is understood that, if agreed, a new deal would see them work much more closely to try to cut costs in areas such as technology, ticketing and administration.

According to the BBC's business reporter Joe Lynam, British Airways is also hoping to secure its status as a global airline well into the future.

Any deal between BA and AA would be subject to regulatory scrutiny.

The two airlines have failed in the past to gain immunity from US competition laws for a tie-up, but British Airways believes that relaxations in regulations under the Open Skies agreement may make this more likely.

Rival Virgin Atlantic has said it would oppose any joint venture between the two transatlantic carriers, saying it would create "a dominant mega-power" on routes between Europe and the United States."
raffele is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2008, 17:14
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rival Virgin Atlantic has said it would oppose any joint venture between the two transatlantic carriers, saying it would create "a dominant mega-power" on routes between Europe and the United States."
Rather than 'oppose', perhaps the bearded one had better get cracking and find an alliance of his own, for Virgin...
411A is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2008, 19:14
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: LGW
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh great. Haven't we been down this road before? If it was to come off wouldn't it enable BA/AA/IB to charge what they like on their routes and sod the passenger?

I'm going to defect and ask my travel team if I can start using Lufthansa!
Dan Air 87 is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2008, 10:08
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why should BA/IB/AA tie up be any different to AF/KL/DL/NW??

It's all Europe and American tie ups, so BA/AA/IB should be allowed to do this if all carriers are to be treated the same.
AirLCY is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2008, 17:35
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dan Air 87,

BA/IB/AA would have less of a majority over major routes than AF/KL/NW/DL. I don't see the problem with this merger, the latter was approved and if it's blocked then there is a serious issue with fairness of competition.

As for Lufthansa, they have a much bigger majority at Frankfurt than BA do at LHR, yet of course only BA shall be criticised so that point is invalid.

When Richard Branson starts throwing his toys out of the pram, he will be shunned because he hasn't got a foot to stand on anymore with the revelation of open skies.
BerksFlyer is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2008, 04:50
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: leafy suburbs
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I believe that this will have strong repercussions for Spanish ATC and how they will manage their approach/departure priority (queue-jumping) policy."

Perhaps BA should take over Alitalia as well
keel beam is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.