Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Ghost flights

Old 14th Nov 2007, 11:41
  #21 (permalink)  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gloucestershire
Age: 54
Posts: 6
I bet the "no cabin crew" wheeze has given Ryanair an idea though...
You watch, turn up at Stansted in a couple of months and the galley area will have coffee and sweetie vending machines.

Just think of the increased "revenues" to be made by laying off allthe c/c!
AdrianDW is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 12:04
  #22 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,061
Well, if it was just for the slots, BA could have an operator doing a daily EMA-LHR run with a Shed instead of flying a 747 across the pond. I seem to remember that Virgin exactly did that at LGW and used a small operator to keep its slots warm by flying EXT-LGW.

So apparently these ghost flights are indeed more some kind of postioning flight as the return flights can be crewed as planned in the US.
virginblue is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 13:46
  #23 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 272
Ghost flights - apt and nearly true.... many BA flights on LHR movements as part of the T5 readiness program, so they have to run "live" but not actual flights to test the new systems. Or so I was told.....
slingsby is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2008, 06:38
  #24 (permalink)  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: FL 350
Posts: 346
Post 'Ghost flights' and fake passengers for crisis airlines

Planes ‘fly empty’ to keep slots at Heathrow

Britain’s third-largest airline, bmi, will fly near-empty aircraft while Flybe has advertised for actors to take its seats

Last edited by heli_port; 16th Jul 2008 at 07:46.
heli_port is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2008, 07:10
  #25 (permalink)  
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middlesesx
Posts: 2,047
The airport co-ordination slots team states that you must operate 80% of your alotted slots or risk losing them. It was predicted that there would be a 20% cutback so it appears to me that there is perhaps not as much panic as some thought. BA's AGM yesterday has reported a similar situation 'not cutting back on to many services'? The real issue here is just what happens with the bookings as we get well into the winter season.

Apart from all this once again to fly a/c almost empty for the sake of the slot reflects the stupudity of our industry and its total lack of flexibility. Airlines should be at least able to retain slots for a period despite canx services (perhaps the complete season).
HZ123 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2008, 07:36
  #26 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 43
Posts: 1
wow, crazy read.
wingsofsteel is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2008, 08:13
  #27 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 723
Let's just hope.............

They all have the idea to charter a t/prop..........................

Have the airports got wise to that scam yet, or are we gonna see another A320 day-stop in CWL daily just to keep the slots?

boredcounter is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2008, 08:22
  #28 (permalink)  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 6,407
Peter Morrisroe, the managing director of Airport Coordination, the company that is responsible for the allocation of slots at British airports, said: “If an airline wants to retain the rights to its slots, it is essential it complies with the use-it-or-lose-it rule.”
With inflexible, do it my way or else bureaucrats like this in the industry, who needs enemies ?

It's like saying that if Asda find a downturn and don't use an aisle in the supermarket, it has to be offered up to Tesco or Sainsbury to use. And they would never get it back.

Every Heathrow user would love unrequired flights to be eliminated. Think of the reduction in holding.
WHBM is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2008, 08:27
  #29 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 63
Posts: 9,104
add quote

A quiet news day. I recall this story appearing twice in the last year - if not more. My guess is that the problem stems from the deliberately confused way that slots are dealt with in the post privatisation of the UK airline world.

Amusingly, this paragraph is from near the end of The Times article:
BMI, which operates 1,700 flights per week over a network of 36 airports, later confirmed that it would not be operating “empty” flights in order to protect Heathrow slots.
So - does that mean that the headline is just there to grab attention and that it's all hot air? Surely not.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2008, 08:45
  #30 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cambs England
Age: 62
Posts: 646
The inflexability does seem economically stupid - lets not forget the winter peaks in Christmas & the new Year. BMI might use their ERJ's - and how about those Flybe ex Bacon ER's that are comming to the end of their lease's - Is it possible to statisticly predict demand during the lighter demand Mid day / afternoon periods and operate a pool system for A/C - The competition is best fundamentalists would not like it - tough ! - Peops get their freq of service and less fuel is burned.
Life in the ERJ's yet ? perhaps - I know about crewing validation probs as an igorant SLF,but some idea's please.
CATIII-NDB is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2008, 08:45
  #31 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: LGW
Posts: 45
At the bottom of the article it quotes figures from the Times Database. They state the cost of a flight LHR to EDI as £60,000! Surely not right as for a 100 seat jet that's still £600 a seat for a 50 minute flight. No wonder this is such a pants business to be in.
Bat Fastard is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2008, 08:49
  #32 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cambs England
Age: 62
Posts: 646
I once saw an article in the Gruniad that used a 747 cost as the basis of costs Lon to Prague - NB the jurno's would not know the context of how types are operated on a given route.
CATIII-NDB is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2008, 11:40
  #33 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: OXF
Posts: 428
Well, FlyBE's been known to have wanted to use actors before... it caused a furore the last time I remember.

One airline ran a daily empty service between LHR and CWL for a while to keep its slots at LHR.

VAFFPAX is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2008, 11:56
  #34 (permalink)  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leicester UK
Posts: 68
All this b*llocks - in an Airport that's already overstretched. Whats wrong with the airlines paying a retainer for the slots, for say a maximum of one season? Cheaper than flying fresh air around, less aircraft (one hopes = less delays) plus it would keep the greens happy. Never happen though! Why?. Because empty aircraft have no passengers on board who spend money in the terminal!
Wiggly Bob is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2008, 15:13
  #35 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Somewhere between T1 and T3
Posts: 113
BBC NEWS | UK | Airline denies 'ghost' plane plan

here is the link to the BBC story on this once again the media has twisted the story to suit.

And as for the green argument in the times. Please give it a rest when China, USA and India turn green I will stop flying on domestic flights and take the bus to heathrow but until then its called car and a flight between LHR - EDI.
Mr Flaps is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2008, 16:01
  #36 (permalink)  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 43
pay retainer for slots

Interesting concept.

who would you propose the retainer is paid to?

Airports would love this as they currently get nothing from slot trading.
This is all done between airlines.

Government would also love it, but the runway is not theirs to charge for the slot.

slot co-ordinators can't take it as that is an effective bribe and breaks all their rules.

the whole system is a joke.
the owners of the runway who pay for it's upkeep get very little say in the matter. maybe the system should be reviewed.
Dragon tracker is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2008, 20:58
  #37 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 63
Posts: 9,104
Please be careful in what you say Dragon tracker, as it sounds like you are dangerously close to talking common sense.

But you know very well that a plain, open and fair system of slot trading - where all parties can feel that they are well served by the process - is not possible as it would simply not be British. So, do pipe down, otherwise, we'll have to send the men in the Land-Rover and you know what that means ...
PAXboy is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2008, 12:09
  #38 (permalink)  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leicester UK
Posts: 68
Paxboy, I'm with you on the green issues. It's just that other people seem to lap it up so why not use it as a marketing tool to get results?

Like you said, in todays "Great" Briton. who needs common sense!
Wiggly Bob is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2008, 12:48
  #39 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 47
Posts: 2,827
"a plain, open and fair system of slot trading ... is not possible as it would simply not be British."

And might not be legally riggable to sufficiently protect a certain Big Airline as the current one does...
MarkD is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.