Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Radio-controlled cameras disrupt Beijing flights

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Radio-controlled cameras disrupt Beijing flights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jun 2007, 12:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Radio-controlled cameras disrupt Beijing flights

Cameras disrupt Beijing flights
Flights were disrupted at Beijing's airport because of interference from radio-controlled cameras 14km (9 miles) away, a Chinese investigation says.
Three small cameras fitted on lifts at a building were responsible, China Daily newspaper said on the findings.
"The radio waves severely disturbed normal flight take-off and landings," said Su Qing of the Northern China Air Traffic Management Bureau.
The report did not say when the interference occurred.
Beijing's airport is being expanded ahead of next year's Summer Olympics.
"The radio was using the same frequency channel as the airport radar, therefore, largely dampening the performance," Mr Su told China Daily.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/h...ic/6736661.stm
rotornut is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2007, 15:42
  #2 (permalink)  
MNT
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southampton
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RFI from Cameras

This is pretty much the same around the world wireless devices including Cameras, Phones and Bugs plus a whole load of other items under fault conditions cause RFI that interferes with ATC RT channels it usually does warrant news coverage though. The report is not specific about the level of delay anybody know how big the issue was e.g. no.of flights affected and how much delay?
MNT is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2007, 15:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.... under fault conditions....
Cheapo stuff doesn't even need "fault conditions", it emits on totally illegal frequencies - and never mind the harmonics...

One may assume it was the airport radar RT that was affected, not the radar itself : radar aerials are too directive, so it would only have caused a narrow strobe on the screen.
ChristiaanJ is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2007, 21:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: pietralunga
Posts: 169
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would be fairly amazed if a camera using RF transmission, however badly designed, had enough spurious emission/ harmonics to have this effect, Compared to the radar, they would be very low powered, and inside a metal cage (the lift) inside a concrete shaft inside a building. I do this sort of thing for a living, and all the lift cameras I have known are hard wired, and the cables run with the cabling powering and controlling the lift.

The other way round, Ground radars often interfere with legal, low powered RF transmissions within the building.
kms901 is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2007, 21:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
kms901,
I suspect the usual journalistic or translation confusion... the "lifts" were probably cranes on a building site.

As to ground radar interference with other (legal) systems, don't get me started.
ChristiaanJ is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.