BANGKOK SUVARNABHUMI
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: not a million miles from old BKK
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BANGKOK SUVARNABHUMI
On the local radio news this morning. The Thai authorities are considering re-opening Bangkok Don Muang Airport due to "continuing problems" at the recently opened Bangkok Suvarnabhumi.
The low cost airlines have been unhappy for some time. There have been reports of collapsing taxiways and various problems with lifts and baggage handling.
Something of an embarrassment! I haven't had an opportunity to use the new airport yet so I have no first hand experience of it from a pax point of view.
The low cost airlines have been unhappy for some time. There have been reports of collapsing taxiways and various problems with lifts and baggage handling.
Something of an embarrassment! I haven't had an opportunity to use the new airport yet so I have no first hand experience of it from a pax point of view.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central London
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lack of toilets and very poor signage plus the retail space is operated by local monopoly King Power. They seem to think it's a good idea to obstruct the approach to passport control with a large duty free outlet, the last thing you want after a 12 hour red eye flight.
Trying to buy a beer or meal involves a queue to buy a swipe card at one counter, taking it to queue at the bar and then another queue to collect whatever change you are owed when you return the card. It all makes work I suppose but I prefered the old style waiters and bills at the table in Don Muang.
The talk is that domestic flights could re locate to Don Muang which would mean a 45 minute taxi ride across Bangkok if you are changing from international to domestic.
One thing the new airport has in common with the old is the taxi and hotel touts.
Give me Singapore, KL or Schipol anyday.
Trying to buy a beer or meal involves a queue to buy a swipe card at one counter, taking it to queue at the bar and then another queue to collect whatever change you are owed when you return the card. It all makes work I suppose but I prefered the old style waiters and bills at the table in Don Muang.
The talk is that domestic flights could re locate to Don Muang which would mean a 45 minute taxi ride across Bangkok if you are changing from international to domestic.
One thing the new airport has in common with the old is the taxi and hotel touts.
Give me Singapore, KL or Schipol anyday.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Firstly, let me re-state that this IS a rumour site, so I don't know whether this can be confirmned. However, having said that, a Thai acquaintance told me that many of the problems associated with the new BKK airport stem from the recently departed Prime Minister of Thailand and the allegations of corruption that lead to his political demise.
She said the word is that all contracts went to 'mates' and the said 'mates' supplied the lowest quality matrial and work they could possibly get away with, to the point where most Thais are terriby embarrassed by the end product, given that it is so highly visible to all visitors to the country.
The whole terminal has an unfinished look and feel to it. Signs giving directions are almost non-existent, and what ones are there are confusing for someone used to airports - God only knows how inexperienced travellers cope with them. The floors remind me of PSP - perforated steel plating - the old temporary runway material used for throwing down a quickie temporary runway back in WW2 days. They actually move underfoot when there're just a few people on them - I'd hate to think what they're like with a 747 load of pax walking over them.
And is it only me who thinks it more than a little strange they've gone for the "twilight" look inside the terminal? It's so gloomy in the departure lounges, it's impossible to read a book. I find myself wondering if they've done that so the bare (or no) ceilings and general lack of finish won't be so obvious, or whether it's because the wiring can't handle the extra candle power required to provide adequate lighting? (It might be even simpler - maybe there aren't enough light fittings!)
She said the word is that all contracts went to 'mates' and the said 'mates' supplied the lowest quality matrial and work they could possibly get away with, to the point where most Thais are terriby embarrassed by the end product, given that it is so highly visible to all visitors to the country.
The whole terminal has an unfinished look and feel to it. Signs giving directions are almost non-existent, and what ones are there are confusing for someone used to airports - God only knows how inexperienced travellers cope with them. The floors remind me of PSP - perforated steel plating - the old temporary runway material used for throwing down a quickie temporary runway back in WW2 days. They actually move underfoot when there're just a few people on them - I'd hate to think what they're like with a 747 load of pax walking over them.
And is it only me who thinks it more than a little strange they've gone for the "twilight" look inside the terminal? It's so gloomy in the departure lounges, it's impossible to read a book. I find myself wondering if they've done that so the bare (or no) ceilings and general lack of finish won't be so obvious, or whether it's because the wiring can't handle the extra candle power required to provide adequate lighting? (It might be even simpler - maybe there aren't enough light fittings!)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: thailand
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I must agree on all items posted above. I travel through BKK many times and had worked with many employees at the airport. They are saying the same thing what is posted above. Whoever approved a glass structure in the tropics should loose their job or at least are made to walk from domestic to an internation gate each day they are employed. The glass is always dirty and always seems a mess. It is also extremely hot and the higher you go the hotter is gets. Restraurants are few and the ones that are there are expensive. The only airport that I think is worse is Heathrow, but that has an excuse. It's old.
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A disaster area.
Windows growing mould, taxiways subsiding, tarmac so soft that large amounts of power requires to taxi, building too hot, no signs, no announcements, few baggage counters.
Someone, somewhere has no doubt made a lot of money out of this disaster area, but the airport users are left to suffer the consequences.
Heads should roll, for what should have been a showpiece facility is a rapidly becoming a national embarrassment.
Windows growing mould, taxiways subsiding, tarmac so soft that large amounts of power requires to taxi, building too hot, no signs, no announcements, few baggage counters.
Someone, somewhere has no doubt made a lot of money out of this disaster area, but the airport users are left to suffer the consequences.
Heads should roll, for what should have been a showpiece facility is a rapidly becoming a national embarrassment.
N4790P
Wiley & Callout summed it up well. Having used Suvarnabhumi virtually weekly I’ve watched the place literally fall apart.
The revolving glass entrance doors are nearly all unserviceable and the outside walkways from the roads are filthy. It already looks like an old airport as opposed to a new one.
It certainly is an embarrassment. These pics were taken today. 1st is Level 1 and 2nd is Level 2 (arrivals).
The revolving glass entrance doors are nearly all unserviceable and the outside walkways from the roads are filthy. It already looks like an old airport as opposed to a new one.
It certainly is an embarrassment. These pics were taken today. 1st is Level 1 and 2nd is Level 2 (arrivals).
Last edited by ZFT; 22nd Dec 2006 at 11:25. Reason: Images added
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central London
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let us not mince words here. Deposed PM Thaksin (outed in a recent coup) tried to open this wreck of an airport a year ago to save face(very important in Asia).
I sat a few days ago in a departure area watching Thai gardeners sleeping on the grass while a few tried to rectify sprinklers that had not worked for months hence the dead turf.
If you can't get the gardens right what hope is there for the rest?
Dump trucks are still emptying landfill with dust clouds as 747's slide an approach to this 3rd world airport.
I sat a few days ago in a departure area watching Thai gardeners sleeping on the grass while a few tried to rectify sprinklers that had not worked for months hence the dead turf.
If you can't get the gardens right what hope is there for the rest?
Dump trucks are still emptying landfill with dust clouds as 747's slide an approach to this 3rd world airport.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And to think that having missed the opening of Suvarnabhumi by a few weeks and thus flown in to and out of Don Muang, I was mildly disappointed!
As an aside, I flew out of Don Muang with BA a couple of nights after the "foiled liquid bombs plot". Having reassured myself that the a/c, ex-Oz, would have left LHR outbound prior to the grounding of flights and thus be on time (it was) I still expected security related check-in mayhem. Whether it actually improved security I know not, but I must say that the coordinated army of security personnel thrown at the extra x-raying and searching made pre-check-in a complete breeze.
When it came to check-in itself, I travel worldwide frequently to conduct my work, and the Thai lady who handled me in was the most pleasant, efficient, and fastest, by some margin to date for any long haul, "with hold baggage", flight. No smarm, no false smiles, just genuine, excellent, professional, friendly service.
As an aside, I flew out of Don Muang with BA a couple of nights after the "foiled liquid bombs plot". Having reassured myself that the a/c, ex-Oz, would have left LHR outbound prior to the grounding of flights and thus be on time (it was) I still expected security related check-in mayhem. Whether it actually improved security I know not, but I must say that the coordinated army of security personnel thrown at the extra x-raying and searching made pre-check-in a complete breeze.
When it came to check-in itself, I travel worldwide frequently to conduct my work, and the Thai lady who handled me in was the most pleasant, efficient, and fastest, by some margin to date for any long haul, "with hold baggage", flight. No smarm, no false smiles, just genuine, excellent, professional, friendly service.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: EGCC
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mrs Al Fakhem is Thai and a political analyst. The problems at Suvarnabhumi are simply symptomatic for the entire Thaksin era, where cronies could get away with anything as long as they supported Thaksin in his quest for limitless power. One has to see the wider picture. His goal was the time after the present King Bhumipol, who is ailing. Thaksin had loaned Prince Vajiralongkorn, the heir to the throne, massive amounts of money (the Thai royal family is not as rich as people might believe) and then "purchased" a palace from him at a throwaway price. The obvious conclusion that the Thai public (and King Bhumipok, who is 80) were drawing is that Thaksin was getting a hold over the Crown Prince to the extent that the latter could no longer be seen as a moral authority (as his father, the current King, is) or - even worse - that the Crown Prince might not even accept the throne and Thailand would adopt a presidential system, such as the US, with Thaksin at the helm. The Suvarnabhumi project was simply a stepping stone for Thaksin to consolidate his power base - something that went very wrong.
Last edited by Al Fakhem; 23rd Dec 2006 at 05:31.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: not a million miles from old BKK
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
XV105 is spot on!
I actually miss Don Muang. I've been passing through there 2 -3 times year for the past 30 years. It had good restaurants, access was reasonable via the overhead expressway (provided you timed it right) and the plane spotters area is one of the best places to pass an hour or so if your flight is delayed. MK actually combined both which was brilliant.
As to Thaksin and the graft - starting with Thaksin, all those who took kickbacks (and they are surely identifyable) should be publically identified, their photographs, names and addresses published, their assets frozen and confiscated and the funds thus raised used to repair the damage that they have caused through their greed and corruption.
Now. What's the chance of that actually happening?
I actually miss Don Muang. I've been passing through there 2 -3 times year for the past 30 years. It had good restaurants, access was reasonable via the overhead expressway (provided you timed it right) and the plane spotters area is one of the best places to pass an hour or so if your flight is delayed. MK actually combined both which was brilliant.
As to Thaksin and the graft - starting with Thaksin, all those who took kickbacks (and they are surely identifyable) should be publically identified, their photographs, names and addresses published, their assets frozen and confiscated and the funds thus raised used to repair the damage that they have caused through their greed and corruption.
Now. What's the chance of that actually happening?
Last edited by Xeque; 23rd Dec 2006 at 04:36. Reason: spelling :)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central London
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like Don Muang will be back in use shortly.
This from todays Bangkok Post
New airport faces partial shutdown
Mistakes, graft found in almost all contracts
Poor construction at Suvarnabhumi may force parts of the new airport to be shut down for repairs. This would open the way for the recently abandoned Don Muang airport to be re-opened to serve Bangkok's air traffic needs.
Deputy Transport Minister Sansern Wongcha-um said yesterday that following a recent report on the problems facing Suvarnabhumi airport, it was likely that part of the new facility would have to be closed and Don Muang airport would pick up the slack.
Some people had suggested the airport, open less than three months, be completely closed for a revamp, with flights being redirected to Don Muang until the improvements are completed, Mr Sansern said. He was opposed to that. Trying to move everything back to Don Muang would cause chaos.
The Council for Democratic Reform _ now the Council for National Security _ asked about the readiness of Suvarnabhumi airport just after the Sept 19 coup, but executives of the Airports of Thailand (AoT) had insisted the airport was ready for the scheduled Sept 28 opening.
Opening the airport before it was completed had inevitably led to problems. If the opening had been delayed to allow work to be finished properly, the airport would have started on a more solid footing.
The new AoT board appointed after the coup has discovered physical and managerial problems at Suvarnabhumi airport.
Board member Yodyiam Theptranont, who heads a sub-panel investigating the problems, said the repairs would take a long time. He could not give a timeframe.
Mr Yodyiam's report to the AoT board outlined a lengthy list of complaints and deficiencies, along with a list of recommendations on fixing the problems.
The report attributed the faults to substandard construction, poor management and manipulation of designs and materials.
The report said the airport's information technology facilities were incomplete and the upper floors of the car park building have no drains, causing rain water to flow into elevator shafts.
Over 1,000 lamps had already burned out and not been replaced.
Mr Yodyiam said AoT lacked an official with direct responsibility for the airport's construction, which had posed an obstacle in getting swift repairs.
Another AoT board member, Tortrakul Yomnak, said many areas need repairs and a partial closure was likely.
Chaisak Angsuwan, director-general of the Civil Aviation Department, said that due to the persistent problems, the department could not issue a permanent licence for Suvarnabhumi airport.
It would, however, extend an interim aerodrome certificate for the airport for another six months in January, he said.
Mr Chaisak said the airport needed to meet all physical and operational requirements before it could be given a permanent certificate.
There were many cracks in the airport's taxiways, some serious and some not, and repairs would be time-consuming, he said. Many operations staff also have no expertise in using their equipment.
Adm Bannawit Kengrian, chairman of the National Legislative Assembly's committee on Suvarnabhumi airport, said his panel had discovered mistakes and irregularities in almost all the airport's contracts. Names of those believed responsible would be announced in two weeks.
Specifications in some contracts had been distorted, he said.
Salaries paid executives of the Novotel Suvarnabhumi Airport Hotel were unusually high. Despite its claimed five-star status, the hotel had plywood doors.
An inexperienced contractor operated transformers that supply power to visiting aircraft and six transformers had burnt out. The cost of digging ditches around the airport was inflated to three billion baht and hiring security guards to five billion baht.
Any contracts where corruption was found would be scrapped, he said
This from todays Bangkok Post
New airport faces partial shutdown
Mistakes, graft found in almost all contracts
Poor construction at Suvarnabhumi may force parts of the new airport to be shut down for repairs. This would open the way for the recently abandoned Don Muang airport to be re-opened to serve Bangkok's air traffic needs.
Deputy Transport Minister Sansern Wongcha-um said yesterday that following a recent report on the problems facing Suvarnabhumi airport, it was likely that part of the new facility would have to be closed and Don Muang airport would pick up the slack.
Some people had suggested the airport, open less than three months, be completely closed for a revamp, with flights being redirected to Don Muang until the improvements are completed, Mr Sansern said. He was opposed to that. Trying to move everything back to Don Muang would cause chaos.
The Council for Democratic Reform _ now the Council for National Security _ asked about the readiness of Suvarnabhumi airport just after the Sept 19 coup, but executives of the Airports of Thailand (AoT) had insisted the airport was ready for the scheduled Sept 28 opening.
Opening the airport before it was completed had inevitably led to problems. If the opening had been delayed to allow work to be finished properly, the airport would have started on a more solid footing.
The new AoT board appointed after the coup has discovered physical and managerial problems at Suvarnabhumi airport.
Board member Yodyiam Theptranont, who heads a sub-panel investigating the problems, said the repairs would take a long time. He could not give a timeframe.
Mr Yodyiam's report to the AoT board outlined a lengthy list of complaints and deficiencies, along with a list of recommendations on fixing the problems.
The report attributed the faults to substandard construction, poor management and manipulation of designs and materials.
The report said the airport's information technology facilities were incomplete and the upper floors of the car park building have no drains, causing rain water to flow into elevator shafts.
Over 1,000 lamps had already burned out and not been replaced.
Mr Yodyiam said AoT lacked an official with direct responsibility for the airport's construction, which had posed an obstacle in getting swift repairs.
Another AoT board member, Tortrakul Yomnak, said many areas need repairs and a partial closure was likely.
Chaisak Angsuwan, director-general of the Civil Aviation Department, said that due to the persistent problems, the department could not issue a permanent licence for Suvarnabhumi airport.
It would, however, extend an interim aerodrome certificate for the airport for another six months in January, he said.
Mr Chaisak said the airport needed to meet all physical and operational requirements before it could be given a permanent certificate.
There were many cracks in the airport's taxiways, some serious and some not, and repairs would be time-consuming, he said. Many operations staff also have no expertise in using their equipment.
Adm Bannawit Kengrian, chairman of the National Legislative Assembly's committee on Suvarnabhumi airport, said his panel had discovered mistakes and irregularities in almost all the airport's contracts. Names of those believed responsible would be announced in two weeks.
Specifications in some contracts had been distorted, he said.
Salaries paid executives of the Novotel Suvarnabhumi Airport Hotel were unusually high. Despite its claimed five-star status, the hotel had plywood doors.
An inexperienced contractor operated transformers that supply power to visiting aircraft and six transformers had burnt out. The cost of digging ditches around the airport was inflated to three billion baht and hiring security guards to five billion baht.
Any contracts where corruption was found would be scrapped, he said
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: XXX
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
stop whininG & bitching around..................the airport its ok
same or worst problems hapen evrywhere, AMS , DEL, you name it
i was in taipei, JFK, Maimi, & PHI airports last week, & their thin can´s, the worst being T4 in JFK, which is suposed to be new, ,,,,,,damn its suck´s!!!, no space between conveyor belt to pick up your bags, within arriving flights, what a mess
not to mention the time wasting , getting naked , stupid question of security @ any aiport in USA...................%&$"$·"$·"(/&%, plus the very unfriendly customs people that receive you when you enter! onle there you are treated like that..............no other place in the planet, they are freaks when it comes to the so called security!
but coming back to the airpot.................its OK
i get in & and out of there faster, always find a taxi
stop screaming like ladies, & enjoy the thing................Jeez!!!
same or worst problems hapen evrywhere, AMS , DEL, you name it
i was in taipei, JFK, Maimi, & PHI airports last week, & their thin can´s, the worst being T4 in JFK, which is suposed to be new, ,,,,,,damn its suck´s!!!, no space between conveyor belt to pick up your bags, within arriving flights, what a mess
not to mention the time wasting , getting naked , stupid question of security @ any aiport in USA...................%&$"$·"$·"(/&%, plus the very unfriendly customs people that receive you when you enter! onle there you are treated like that..............no other place in the planet, they are freaks when it comes to the so called security!
but coming back to the airpot.................its OK
i get in & and out of there faster, always find a taxi
stop screaming like ladies, & enjoy the thing................Jeez!!!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: XXX
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well pal,.....its one of the few country(s) if not the only 1, in which U have to take out shoe,belt,jacket,hat, & ok, if it makes U happy..........well then "almost" get naked in front of evryone
not to mention the procedure now with liquids, gels or medicines, to take out & put on a plastic bag ha ha ha so funny, looks like a bargain sunday market , hearing the customs guys screaming it out loud , ha ha ha ha
not to mention the procedure now with liquids, gels or medicines, to take out & put on a plastic bag ha ha ha so funny, looks like a bargain sunday market , hearing the customs guys screaming it out loud , ha ha ha ha
N4790P
The Bangkok Post report:-
AoT backs rebirth of Don Muang
Old airport to service some domestic routes
AMORNRAT MAHITTHIROOK
The board of Airports of Thailand Plc yesterday approved the use of Don Muang for domestic flights with no international connections and set March 15 as the possible date for the relaunch of services at the old airport.
In an attempt to save costs from expanding Suvarnabhumi airport and to fully use its existing infrastructure, the board led by chairman Gen Saprang Kalayanamitr decided to move to Don Muang domestic flights with no connections to international routes operated by Thai Airways International (THAI) and no-frills carriers. Domestic flights with passengers connecting with international routes will remain at Suvarnabhumi.
It targeted March 15 for the resumption of regular services for Don Muang, which was closed on Sept 28, when the country's main airport moved to Suvarnabhumi.
The March 15 date was set to allow sufficient time to prepare for an expected surge in air travel to the provinces during the Songkran holiday.
Sources in the Airports of Thailand (AoT) board said its president Chotisak Asapaviriya told the meeting that the March 15 move was possible. However, he told reporters afterwards that he could not guarantee complete success.
The decision was based on a study by AoT to compare the advantages and disadvantages of expanding Suvarnabhumi against relocating domestic services to Don Muang.
The use of Don Muang to ease air traffic at Suvarnabhumi would give officials more flexibility to fix a number of problems at the new airport, sources said.
Mr Chotisak said the board has directed AoT to work on the details of the use of Don Muang and forward them to the Transport Ministry _ which oversees the airport agency _ within two weeks. After that the ministry, which has already made clear its preference for Don Muang, needs cabinet approval for the plan.
Based on the current volume of passengers, Suvarnabhumi will serve 42 million passengers a year, just three million shy of its full capacity.
Don Muang accommodated almost 39 million passengers a year before it was closed to regular flights. It currently services only chartered and special flights.
Moving domestic flights with no connections to Don Muang will defer plans to expand the new airport, including the need to build a new terminal to service only local flights in the future.
The move will boost revenues at Don Muang, which currently earns only 500,000 baht a month from the chartered and special flights.
Don Muang director Pinit Saraithong said the airport was ready for the return to services because none of the facilities, including ground and safety equipment, had been moved to Suvarnabhumi.
However, he said the airport needed about 45 days to prepare for the return of regular passengers and to hire more security staff. With existing facilities, Don Muang could serve up to 15 million passengers a year for a decade, he added.
Airlines with domestic services _THAI, Nok Air, Thai AirAsia and One-Two-Go _ supported yesterday's decision.
Bangkok Airways could not be reached for comment.
THAI president Apinan Sumanaseni said the national flag carrier needed one month to move some equipment and hire more staff to be stationed at Don Muang but he said it was not a serious problem for the airline.
Mr Apinan said flights serving popular destinations among international passengers such as Phuket, Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai and Hat Yai could remain at Suvarnabhumi.
Nok Air CEO Patee Sarasin praised the decision, which could save AoT at least 1.4 billion baht from constructing a new domestic building at Suvarnabhumi.
One-Two-Go chief executive and founder Udom Tantiprasongchai also hailed the decision, saying it was a ''good decision'' to shift domestic routes to Don Muang.
But Thai AirAsia CEO Tassapon Bijleveld said the move to Don Muang should be on a voluntary basis. He admitted that the move would affect Thai AirAsia, which needed to rotate its fleets between international and domestic flights.
AoT backs rebirth of Don Muang
Old airport to service some domestic routes
AMORNRAT MAHITTHIROOK
The board of Airports of Thailand Plc yesterday approved the use of Don Muang for domestic flights with no international connections and set March 15 as the possible date for the relaunch of services at the old airport.
In an attempt to save costs from expanding Suvarnabhumi airport and to fully use its existing infrastructure, the board led by chairman Gen Saprang Kalayanamitr decided to move to Don Muang domestic flights with no connections to international routes operated by Thai Airways International (THAI) and no-frills carriers. Domestic flights with passengers connecting with international routes will remain at Suvarnabhumi.
It targeted March 15 for the resumption of regular services for Don Muang, which was closed on Sept 28, when the country's main airport moved to Suvarnabhumi.
The March 15 date was set to allow sufficient time to prepare for an expected surge in air travel to the provinces during the Songkran holiday.
Sources in the Airports of Thailand (AoT) board said its president Chotisak Asapaviriya told the meeting that the March 15 move was possible. However, he told reporters afterwards that he could not guarantee complete success.
The decision was based on a study by AoT to compare the advantages and disadvantages of expanding Suvarnabhumi against relocating domestic services to Don Muang.
The use of Don Muang to ease air traffic at Suvarnabhumi would give officials more flexibility to fix a number of problems at the new airport, sources said.
Mr Chotisak said the board has directed AoT to work on the details of the use of Don Muang and forward them to the Transport Ministry _ which oversees the airport agency _ within two weeks. After that the ministry, which has already made clear its preference for Don Muang, needs cabinet approval for the plan.
Based on the current volume of passengers, Suvarnabhumi will serve 42 million passengers a year, just three million shy of its full capacity.
Don Muang accommodated almost 39 million passengers a year before it was closed to regular flights. It currently services only chartered and special flights.
Moving domestic flights with no connections to Don Muang will defer plans to expand the new airport, including the need to build a new terminal to service only local flights in the future.
The move will boost revenues at Don Muang, which currently earns only 500,000 baht a month from the chartered and special flights.
Don Muang director Pinit Saraithong said the airport was ready for the return to services because none of the facilities, including ground and safety equipment, had been moved to Suvarnabhumi.
However, he said the airport needed about 45 days to prepare for the return of regular passengers and to hire more security staff. With existing facilities, Don Muang could serve up to 15 million passengers a year for a decade, he added.
Airlines with domestic services _THAI, Nok Air, Thai AirAsia and One-Two-Go _ supported yesterday's decision.
Bangkok Airways could not be reached for comment.
THAI president Apinan Sumanaseni said the national flag carrier needed one month to move some equipment and hire more staff to be stationed at Don Muang but he said it was not a serious problem for the airline.
Mr Apinan said flights serving popular destinations among international passengers such as Phuket, Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai and Hat Yai could remain at Suvarnabhumi.
Nok Air CEO Patee Sarasin praised the decision, which could save AoT at least 1.4 billion baht from constructing a new domestic building at Suvarnabhumi.
One-Two-Go chief executive and founder Udom Tantiprasongchai also hailed the decision, saying it was a ''good decision'' to shift domestic routes to Don Muang.
But Thai AirAsia CEO Tassapon Bijleveld said the move to Don Muang should be on a voluntary basis. He admitted that the move would affect Thai AirAsia, which needed to rotate its fleets between international and domestic flights.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central London
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
More problems at new Bangkok airport
More problems at Suvarnabhumi with further taxiway damage by underground water. It appears there are also concerns of runway subsidance in the future.
The airport is built on a reclaimed swamp!
From the Bangkok Post
More woes at troubled new airport
Runway subsidence claims, probe ordered
Transport Minister Theera Haocharoen has ordered an investigation into a report of land subsidence and cracks on a runway at Suvarnabhumi airport. But the airport's director Somchai Sawasdeepol denied there was any subsidence in the runway now in use although he agreed experts must find the cause of problems on taxiways. Adm Theera said he ordered agencies to conduct an investigation immediately after receiving the report.
According to sources at the Transport Ministry and Airports of Thailand Plc (AoT), AoT board member Tortrakul Yomnak reported slight subsidence on a runway at Suvarnabhumi during a meeting yesterday on the re-use of Don Muang airport.
Adm Theera and his deputy, Sansern Wongcha-um, immediately met with Mr Tortrakul and Yodyiem Theptharanont, another AoT board member, to discuss what they saw as a serious problem.
The sources quoted Mr Tortrakul as saying the subsidence had been spotted at the ''takeoff'' area. He advised closure of the runway for repairs but warned that the problem may recur.
Mr Sansern confirmed that Mr Tortrakul had made the clarification. Mr Sansern said this concerned the area where airplanes waited before taking off, and said he would inspect the runway himself next week.
According to an AoT source, cracks were found at the takeoff area of the western runway. As an immediate solution, pilots were advised to shift their takeoff area. The western runway would be closed for repairs and the eastern runway would be used instead, the source said.
A contractor who asked not to be named said excessive underground water which had caused taxiways to swell up and crack could also pose problems to the runways at Suvarnabhumi airport.
A runway with soaked foundations could gradually subside due to the heavy weight of landing flights.
During the floods last year, contractors warned AoT of possible problems with the runway, the source said.Contractors sought permission to pump excessive water out of the airport right away but AoT did not grant it for fear of causing trouble to communities around the airport.
The AoT source said it had asked a Japanese contractor to repair the crack but the contractor refused, saying the damage was not its fault.
AoT would tell the contractor to repair the runway and later claim the cost from its insurer, the source said.
Mr Somchai, director of Suvarnabhumi airport, said contractors had reported on the level of water in ditches around runways during last year's floods.
Mr Somchai denied any of the runways in use were subsiding. As for the water seeping underground, he said specialists must be hired to test both runways and taxiways.
Meanwhile, yesterday's meeting on the possible re-use of Don Muang airport was inconclusive.
Adm Theera said he would consult his deputy and a proposal should be submitted to the cabinet in the next few weeks.
Sources said most airlines want Don Muang to serve only non-connecting domestic flights. Most low-cost airlines prefer Don Muang to Suvarnabhumi but Thai AirAsia said it might have to invest in a separate terminal for no-frills service at Suvarnabhumi airport.
Demand for the re-use of Don Muang, currently serving only chartered flights, is gaining momentum due to congestion and problems with taxiways and runways at Suvarnabhumi.
Don Muang airport director Pinit Saraithong said the return of non-connecting domestic flights would bring annual traffic to five million passengers.
The old airport should earn 50 million baht a month from the return of regular flights to the airport, he said
The airport is built on a reclaimed swamp!
From the Bangkok Post
More woes at troubled new airport
Runway subsidence claims, probe ordered
Transport Minister Theera Haocharoen has ordered an investigation into a report of land subsidence and cracks on a runway at Suvarnabhumi airport. But the airport's director Somchai Sawasdeepol denied there was any subsidence in the runway now in use although he agreed experts must find the cause of problems on taxiways. Adm Theera said he ordered agencies to conduct an investigation immediately after receiving the report.
According to sources at the Transport Ministry and Airports of Thailand Plc (AoT), AoT board member Tortrakul Yomnak reported slight subsidence on a runway at Suvarnabhumi during a meeting yesterday on the re-use of Don Muang airport.
Adm Theera and his deputy, Sansern Wongcha-um, immediately met with Mr Tortrakul and Yodyiem Theptharanont, another AoT board member, to discuss what they saw as a serious problem.
The sources quoted Mr Tortrakul as saying the subsidence had been spotted at the ''takeoff'' area. He advised closure of the runway for repairs but warned that the problem may recur.
Mr Sansern confirmed that Mr Tortrakul had made the clarification. Mr Sansern said this concerned the area where airplanes waited before taking off, and said he would inspect the runway himself next week.
According to an AoT source, cracks were found at the takeoff area of the western runway. As an immediate solution, pilots were advised to shift their takeoff area. The western runway would be closed for repairs and the eastern runway would be used instead, the source said.
A contractor who asked not to be named said excessive underground water which had caused taxiways to swell up and crack could also pose problems to the runways at Suvarnabhumi airport.
A runway with soaked foundations could gradually subside due to the heavy weight of landing flights.
During the floods last year, contractors warned AoT of possible problems with the runway, the source said.Contractors sought permission to pump excessive water out of the airport right away but AoT did not grant it for fear of causing trouble to communities around the airport.
The AoT source said it had asked a Japanese contractor to repair the crack but the contractor refused, saying the damage was not its fault.
AoT would tell the contractor to repair the runway and later claim the cost from its insurer, the source said.
Mr Somchai, director of Suvarnabhumi airport, said contractors had reported on the level of water in ditches around runways during last year's floods.
Mr Somchai denied any of the runways in use were subsiding. As for the water seeping underground, he said specialists must be hired to test both runways and taxiways.
Meanwhile, yesterday's meeting on the possible re-use of Don Muang airport was inconclusive.
Adm Theera said he would consult his deputy and a proposal should be submitted to the cabinet in the next few weeks.
Sources said most airlines want Don Muang to serve only non-connecting domestic flights. Most low-cost airlines prefer Don Muang to Suvarnabhumi but Thai AirAsia said it might have to invest in a separate terminal for no-frills service at Suvarnabhumi airport.
Demand for the re-use of Don Muang, currently serving only chartered flights, is gaining momentum due to congestion and problems with taxiways and runways at Suvarnabhumi.
Don Muang airport director Pinit Saraithong said the return of non-connecting domestic flights would bring annual traffic to five million passengers.
The old airport should earn 50 million baht a month from the return of regular flights to the airport, he said
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Airconditioned Nightmare
The glass enclosures of the otherwise well designed terminal create too many hot spots during sunny days. Instead of conditioned air bubbling from ceiling registers, conditioned air is ejected from floor mounted radiators which traps the heavier cool air on the floor, creating a greenhouse effect in many parts of the terminal where uneven temperatures exceed 25c. 
N4790P
The glass enclosures of the otherwise well designed terminal create too many hot spots during sunny days. Instead of conditioned air bubbling from ceiling registers, conditioned air is ejected from floor mounted radiators which traps the heavier cool air on the floor, creating a greenhouse effect in many parts of the terminal where uneven temperatures exceed 25c.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: not a million miles from old BKK
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Slightly unrelated
I work in Bangkok and live just outside Pattaya. So, early Monday mornings, I drive up to BKK on the Chonburi motorway to spend the week there. I usually pass by Suvarnabhumi at around 6 am ( just before dawn at present). The problem is swamp flies. They seem to launch at about that time and within seconds my windcreen and (indeed) all forward facing surfaces of my car are covered in squashed insects. My screen washers have difficulty in dealing with them.
My question is - what effect does that have on aircraft windscreens during landing/takeoff at that time of day. The swamp water at the new airport is a real problem. Unless that can be taken care of properly the swamp flies will continue to swarm in enormous numbers just before dawn. And now the other question - how soon before a runway subsides under an arriving 'heavy'?
My question is - what effect does that have on aircraft windscreens during landing/takeoff at that time of day. The swamp water at the new airport is a real problem. Unless that can be taken care of properly the swamp flies will continue to swarm in enormous numbers just before dawn. And now the other question - how soon before a runway subsides under an arriving 'heavy'?