Banned Airlines
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EGMH..a down, not yet out, formerly awesome airfield
Age: 55
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
URGENT STATEMENT FROM DAIRO AIR SERVICES/DAS AIR CARGO
ON THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION BAN LISTING.
Date: 16 October 2006 : 15:00 GMT
Issued By Dairo Air Services, Uganda/ DAS Air Cargo
Dairo Air Services, Uganda wishes to put on record, in the strongest terms, its
objection over the decision by the European Commission to include both Dairo
Air Services and DAS Air Cargo on the most recent list of carriers banned from
operating into and out of the European Union.
Neither Dairo Air Services or DAS Air Cargo received any prior notification that
the European Commission was considering such action, nor has any
justification for this decision been received by the Ugandan Civil Aviation
Authority, the airlines controlling authority. Therefore the company has been
unable to exercise any right of defence, which is embodied within the spirit
and letter of the European Union Directive which established the list.
The Ugandan Civil Aviation Authority and the Airline have always responded
to all communication from European airworthiness authorities when received;
it is after all in the interest of both parties to do so. If any communication
from the European Commission had been received prior to the publication of
the list then we are certain that through dialogue an operating ban would
have been avoided.
The ban entered into effect from Midnight on 14 October 2006 and as a
consequence, all operations to and from Europe have been suspended.
In an effort to protect the business the company is making strenuous efforts
to have the ban lifted, whilst a period of consultation can take place to
resolve any concerns that the European Commission may have.
ON THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION BAN LISTING.
Date: 16 October 2006 : 15:00 GMT
Issued By Dairo Air Services, Uganda/ DAS Air Cargo
Dairo Air Services, Uganda wishes to put on record, in the strongest terms, its
objection over the decision by the European Commission to include both Dairo
Air Services and DAS Air Cargo on the most recent list of carriers banned from
operating into and out of the European Union.
Neither Dairo Air Services or DAS Air Cargo received any prior notification that
the European Commission was considering such action, nor has any
justification for this decision been received by the Ugandan Civil Aviation
Authority, the airlines controlling authority. Therefore the company has been
unable to exercise any right of defence, which is embodied within the spirit
and letter of the European Union Directive which established the list.
The Ugandan Civil Aviation Authority and the Airline have always responded
to all communication from European airworthiness authorities when received;
it is after all in the interest of both parties to do so. If any communication
from the European Commission had been received prior to the publication of
the list then we are certain that through dialogue an operating ban would
have been avoided.
The ban entered into effect from Midnight on 14 October 2006 and as a
consequence, all operations to and from Europe have been suspended.
In an effort to protect the business the company is making strenuous efforts
to have the ban lifted, whilst a period of consultation can take place to
resolve any concerns that the European Commission may have.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EGMH..a down, not yet out, formerly awesome airfield
Age: 55
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We'll all find out by the end of the month. All things concerning the EU take so long 
You'll be second to know...after me 
You'll be second to know...after me
Last edited by Twitcher; 22nd Feb 2007 at 18:01. Reason: changed layout
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: West Yorkshire Zone
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the CAA should make their own decision about the DAS company, It maybe that there is someone in Holland making life hard for this long established airline?
I think the decision to ban operators should be given to each individual country to decide on whether to allow such Airlines to operate to.
I am not suggesting anything, But there maybe something behind the German & Dutch Authorities decision to drive this decision forward?
I think DAS should be given adequate chance to run itself succesfully and safely on a 'probationary' period if necessary.
I don't think many Airlines can hold their hand up and say - We have never broken any SOP's or Rules of the Air.
Maybe their are serious operational irregularities with the DAS DC10's, But the Authorities should work with DAS to hopefully get the Airline on a steady road.
You can't TAR all African operators with the same brush!
Regards.
I think the decision to ban operators should be given to each individual country to decide on whether to allow such Airlines to operate to.
I am not suggesting anything, But there maybe something behind the German & Dutch Authorities decision to drive this decision forward?
I think DAS should be given adequate chance to run itself succesfully and safely on a 'probationary' period if necessary.
I don't think many Airlines can hold their hand up and say - We have never broken any SOP's or Rules of the Air.
Maybe their are serious operational irregularities with the DAS DC10's, But the Authorities should work with DAS to hopefully get the Airline on a steady road.
You can't TAR all African operators with the same brush!
Regards.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EGMH..a down, not yet out, formerly awesome airfield
Age: 55
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BYEALPHAINDIA,
you are 100% correct. The reason for the ban was political, nothing at all to do with the fleets serviceability. The UK CAA is quite happy with the airline and its very own 145 approved maintenance facility. Fingers crossed all will be ok and DAS will just avoid certain airports.
you are 100% correct. The reason for the ban was political, nothing at all to do with the fleets serviceability. The UK CAA is quite happy with the airline and its very own 145 approved maintenance facility. Fingers crossed all will be ok and DAS will just avoid certain airports.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Over here
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Folks, lets not miss the point here - DAS have scre*ed up SEVERAL times in AMS, as have GF who are by all accounts going through a similar scrutiny... is it fair? - probably not - but if it was going to be rectified - it'd be done by now as the operator is always made aware of these matters.
Commiserations to all with DAS that may be affected - some have already had their "voluntary / compulsory" redundancy offer... and the fact is, it is PEOPLE that suffer in these situations ... regardless of what the EU say.
"Avoid certain Airports" - Hey, that's just the way to go and run an International Airline... I don't think so my friend.
Best of luck to the guys still there... I really hope it works out to YOUR benefit!
Cheers
JFF
Commiserations to all with DAS that may be affected - some have already had their "voluntary / compulsory" redundancy offer... and the fact is, it is PEOPLE that suffer in these situations ... regardless of what the EU say.
"Avoid certain Airports" - Hey, that's just the way to go and run an International Airline... I don't think so my friend.
Best of luck to the guys still there... I really hope it works out to YOUR benefit!
Cheers
JFF
