Swansea Airport
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Swansea Airport
Swansea News!
I've just heard (so yes this is a rumour) that 'Awr Abertawe Cymru'
are to lease 1 J31 19 seated aircraft to operate a service to LCY from Swansea twice Daily plus a daily IOM service.
So what do you think the liklihood of this service exceeding is and would you use it?
BA
I've just heard (so yes this is a rumour) that 'Awr Abertawe Cymru'
are to lease 1 J31 19 seated aircraft to operate a service to LCY from Swansea twice Daily plus a daily IOM service.So what do you think the liklihood of this service exceeding is and would you use it?
BA
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SOUTH EAST
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just out of interest, what services are there from swansea, if any, id ont really know much about swansea as everything seems to revolve round cardiff.
Ive tried looking on the website but not much on there to be honest, whats the biggest a/c swansea could handle ??
cheers
Ive tried looking on the website but not much on there to be honest, whats the biggest a/c swansea could handle ??
cheers
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sadly, it will probably go bust in a year, just like every other operator out of swansea has in the past 30 years! still you know the old saying, if you want to make a small fortune out of aviation...........
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Wales
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In theory, both SWS-LCY and SWS-IOM should work. The same can be said about CWL-LCY/IOM. The problem with these two routes is maintaining them long enough for customers to spread the word about the service as well as marketing them and filling the flights at an affordable, yet yielding enough price to make a profit for the airline.
The J31 has 19 seats, that means you would want probably a flight load of around 14/19 per flight at a price of say approximately £48 each way. That would generate £672 each way.
The problem is that both Swansea and Cardiff, have excellent train connections to London with First Great Western. However, I do believe that a South Wales - London air link can and will work.
Regards,
Chris
The J31 has 19 seats, that means you would want probably a flight load of around 14/19 per flight at a price of say approximately £48 each way. That would generate £672 each way.
The problem is that both Swansea and Cardiff, have excellent train connections to London with First Great Western. However, I do believe that a South Wales - London air link can and will work.
Regards,
Chris
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unless something has changed in the last week Swansea doesn't have ATC, therefore the aircraft won't be able to make an instrument approach to the airport so if the weather is Iffy, quite a common occurrence in these parts, it won't be able to land. How on earth do you run a scheduled service that can only fly when the weather is Good ?
Lets get real here
Lets get real here
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh. come on guys, get real. Air Wales and the airport threw money at this a couple of years ago and could'nt make a go of it. ILS installed, new terminal facilities decent ATR 42's etc.etc.etc. A mate of mine loved the LCY service, but the average load on a Monday morning was 5 pax! The bottom line is that there is not enough wealth in the west wales area to generate enough bums on seats for these services. Lord alone knows, its tough enough to make a profit at CWL!!
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Global Nomad
Age: 55
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I too agree that this service will be marginal in profits, but i think that the service may indeed work.
Skid, you hit the nail on the head. The problem with a SWS-LCY service is that it is effectively unidirectional. Not that hard to fill the morning SWS-LCY and the evening LCY-SWS. But the other two sectors? Yuck. Which means that the passengers on the busy services have to pay enough to pay for the empty seats back... plays hell with the economics.
Additionally, one reason that the train will always do well is that the airline is stuck at just a few rotations a day. The train is half hourly at peak times, and hourly off peak. I used to commute to London regularly, and like many other people, found it hard to predict my return time (meetings run on, run short etc). The train gave me a "go home when you are ready" service that the airline could not sensibly provide.
Flower said
How on earth do you run a scheduled service that can only fly when the weather is Good
In theory, both SWS-LCY and SWS-IOM should work. The same can be said about CWL-LCY/IOM. The problem with these two routes is maintaining them long enough for customers to spread the word about the service as well as marketing them and filling the flights at an affordable, yet yielding enough price to make a profit for the airline.
Lets get real here
Last edited by TwinAisle; 11th Sep 2006 at 22:52.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gloucestershire
Age: 66
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LCY landing fees
Look at the LCY fees the ATR operating at Peak to satisfy passengers was costing over £500 per landing thats with out handling pax taxs etc etc. LCY policy then was for aircraft having 80-90 seats plus to spread cost try using a landing of £500 for a J31. Just for info the CAA would not approve the ILS as it did not comply with latest regs for runway(they wanted about 900m of approach lighting full cross bars etc just like LHR!!! not on an aera of ssi)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The J31 has 19 seats, that means you would want probably a flight load of around 14/19 per flight at a price of say approximately £48 each way. That would generate £672 each way.
. So slightly more than you and I thought.
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Global Nomad
Age: 55
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And still NO-WHERE near enough.
Let's assume that this runs double daily. Let's assume that the seats that sell go for £155. This is the PRICE, not the FARE.
The fare is going to be "less tax" - about £35 on this return. So there's a fare of £120 return, £60 (ish) single equivalent.
Now, as I noted earlier, they may well fill (yes, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and assume a VERY unlikely 100% load) on the flight up on a Monday, and back on a Friday. The morning returns and the afternoon outbounds will be miserable - about 2 or 3 pax tops. Trust me, I've been there, as I suspect has xtypeman, if he is who I think he is (and btw, if he is who I think he is, he KNOWS the LCY costs, he is not guessing).
Let's say that the Tues, Weds, and Thurs don't get 100% loads on the two sectors, but, say, a more realistic 75%, as do the returns on Monday night and the outbound on Friday morning.
That gives you a total weekly revenue of £10,920. Put it another way, a yield of £28.73.
As I said - you're dreaming! If you want to put me in touch with these guys, I will try and prevent them pouring their hard-earned readies down the khazi.
Also, I remind you again of the fact that business people need flexibility, and twice a day just won't cut it.
Let's assume that this runs double daily. Let's assume that the seats that sell go for £155. This is the PRICE, not the FARE.
The fare is going to be "less tax" - about £35 on this return. So there's a fare of £120 return, £60 (ish) single equivalent.
Now, as I noted earlier, they may well fill (yes, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and assume a VERY unlikely 100% load) on the flight up on a Monday, and back on a Friday. The morning returns and the afternoon outbounds will be miserable - about 2 or 3 pax tops. Trust me, I've been there, as I suspect has xtypeman, if he is who I think he is (and btw, if he is who I think he is, he KNOWS the LCY costs, he is not guessing).
Let's say that the Tues, Weds, and Thurs don't get 100% loads on the two sectors, but, say, a more realistic 75%, as do the returns on Monday night and the outbound on Friday morning.
That gives you a total weekly revenue of £10,920. Put it another way, a yield of £28.73.
As I said - you're dreaming! If you want to put me in touch with these guys, I will try and prevent them pouring their hard-earned readies down the khazi.
Also, I remind you again of the fact that business people need flexibility, and twice a day just won't cut it.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Live near Cardiff (from Scotland)
Age: 47
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Says in todays pilot on a feature about Swansea that Air Wales are to start operating with a ATR 42 next summer on charter routes?And says its a "sleeping dragon"???Just seems to pop up every month are the finished or what Would be nice to see them back
Would be nice to see them back
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK/Italy/Germany/Thailand
Age: 64
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, they lost a fortune, but methinks that 'you know who' will not give up and is determined to lose several more £million at 'Harry Seccombe International'.....silly ******
the man is mad (but we always knew that!!!!)
aero
the man is mad (but we always knew that!!!!)
aero
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 12 miles nne IOM VOR
Age: 44
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is it with people and the Isle, there are only 70-75,000 people here...
Give it another 5 years and well all be running around in chieftains serving 25 airports in the UK.....
Its not like flying off the island is cheap anyway... beacuse i like to pay £100 return to go 150 miles yet i look at RYR's site and i can go for some where 500 miles away 3 times cheaper... yes i get rather bitter and twisted about that..
Such is life
RANT OFF.
BB
Scheduled air services to/from SWS are just not going to happen, unless the present or new owner/operator wants to commit financial suicide.
A good friend was involved in trying to make ATR 42 services work at SWS, and had to give up when the money ran out.
The airport infrastructure is falling apart, the main runway is in a poor state of repair, the fire service is minimal with equipment that should have been retired years ago, the runway and approach lighting is in a poor state of repair (probably now below CAA standards), the tower would need replacing as there are many blind spots which prevent 360 degree visibility, and of course there is no ATC.
Last i heard there was an ILS installed (for the ATR 42s) but never used operationally, just rotting away.
A brave chance was made to make SWS work, sadly it was not to be, nor will it.
A good friend was involved in trying to make ATR 42 services work at SWS, and had to give up when the money ran out.
The airport infrastructure is falling apart, the main runway is in a poor state of repair, the fire service is minimal with equipment that should have been retired years ago, the runway and approach lighting is in a poor state of repair (probably now below CAA standards), the tower would need replacing as there are many blind spots which prevent 360 degree visibility, and of course there is no ATC.
Last i heard there was an ILS installed (for the ATR 42s) but never used operationally, just rotting away.
A brave chance was made to make SWS work, sadly it was not to be, nor will it.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SWANSEA - what is going wrong?
I've been hearing some rumours lately that Swansea Airport has gone to the wall. Owed a stack of cash and therefore can't pay its bills, run out of fuel (Avgas is dry and Jet for emergency services only).
Can anyone confrim / deny?
Can anyone confrim / deny?
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not much goes on at Swansea these days, virtually no commercial movements at all, very limited number of private movements and I don't know if the parachute school still operates there.
There's no doubt that it is not an economically viable business and is never likely to be.
The Welsh Assembly Government was conducting studies into improving the facilities at the airport as part of the transport infrastructure development strategy for the whole of Wales. The improvements may require some public sector support. Development proposals include: a new terminal building, new hangars, upgraded operating facilities, new fencing and a new access road.
That said, I don't know if this went any further than the discussion stage and given the current economic environment I doubt that any government money would be invested.
There has also been widespread local opposition against the idea of further development of the airport. The main concerns are: the impact on the internationally important Special Area of Conservation which almost surrounds the airport; noise from the potential increased number of flights at the airport; and the negative impact of the development of the airport on the local scenery, since Gower is a designated Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
It's a shame really because the only other options are Cardiff and Bristol, both well equipped and relatively G/A friendly, but very expensive and not very convenient.
There's no doubt that it is not an economically viable business and is never likely to be.
The Welsh Assembly Government was conducting studies into improving the facilities at the airport as part of the transport infrastructure development strategy for the whole of Wales. The improvements may require some public sector support. Development proposals include: a new terminal building, new hangars, upgraded operating facilities, new fencing and a new access road.
That said, I don't know if this went any further than the discussion stage and given the current economic environment I doubt that any government money would be invested.
There has also been widespread local opposition against the idea of further development of the airport. The main concerns are: the impact on the internationally important Special Area of Conservation which almost surrounds the airport; noise from the potential increased number of flights at the airport; and the negative impact of the development of the airport on the local scenery, since Gower is a designated Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
It's a shame really because the only other options are Cardiff and Bristol, both well equipped and relatively G/A friendly, but very expensive and not very convenient.