Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Jet2 leasing 146 for Manchester-Gatwick

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Jet2 leasing 146 for Manchester-Gatwick

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Mar 2006, 22:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,479
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Jet2 leasing 146 for Manchester-Gatwick

Title says it all really - 146-300 being leased from Flightline to operate the 3 x daily MAN-Gatwick services this summer and some weekend flights to Amsterdam and Nice. One wouldn't have thought that they really needed to wet-lease extra aircraft as the 737s are not that heavily utilised, but there you go. It is also mildly amusing that they are flying MAN-LGW and spending money on a wet-lease to operate in competition with BA when they have 737 capacity sitting at LBA and/or NCL which could operate the same Gatwick slots, presumably with lower costs (due not wet-leasing aircraft) and only a marginal revenue difference.
Flightrider is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2006, 02:58
  #2 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't Flightline operating 146 for QF MAN-LHR? Is this the same aircraft?
MarkD is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2006, 06:25
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Stockport
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF have now stopped their 146 feeder flight MAN - LHR
Gordon_uk3 is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2006, 06:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Here
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is also mildly amusing that they are flying MAN-LGW and spending money on a wet-lease to operate in competition with BA when they have 737 capacity sitting at LBA and/or NCL
Come the start of the Summer schedule the NCL based machine doesnt spend a great deal of time on the ground. Bergen, Pisa, Mahon, Amsterdam(Double daily) added to the existing Cork and Murcia routes.
CentreFix25 is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2006, 08:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North of Watford
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why don't they just bin the MAN-LGW flights, where there must be 30 plus flights a day to London, with BA, BMI, VLM, Air Berlin etc. Must be losing a fortune on it from the loads that I've seen. Time to switch it to Leeds, with 4 London flights a day, where it would be better patronised.
POL1W is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2006, 14:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They must be making some money on it. If they were losing money on it, the route would of been axed by now. They have axed failing routes in the past such as BFS-ORK.

I believe the ac being leased in on a 'damp' lease is due to a 737 being down for a C check or smething. Correct me if I am wrong as I am not 100% sure on that one.
jet2impress is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2006, 15:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are surely doing it because of costs. Even with the lease costs it will be cheaper than operating one of their 737's. Fuel burn is lower, en-route costs will be lower. Handling charges will be lower. Overall costs will probably come down by over £300,000 this summer. And they will be able either to sell the 737 or use it elsewhere. They manifestly do not need the capacity of the 737 on MAN-LGW.

They have probably decided to reduce their cost exposure while they wait for someone to buy their LGW slots. That someone is probably easyJet.

Leeds to LGW has never worked for anyone.
thegoaf is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2006, 16:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SE of Compton
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not quite true.....quote 'Leeds to LGW has never worked for anyone'

Cityflyer did the route with SD360s and later ATR42s - I used the route quite a bit and was popular. The fact that the (LGW) slots were required for a Zurich run which was deemed possibly more profitable put pay to the route.

Likewise British Regional used the J41 3 times a day in more recent times...again a route I used. This time the reorganisation of their operation saw the routes & J41s from LBA given over to Eastern...but not the Gatwick slots!

Still reckon that LBA-LGW would work and it's got to be better than the load factors of c40% that J2 have habitually recorded on MAN-LGW since the route started. Simply there is less competition in the total London-Leeds market than there is London-Manchester. The renaissance of the WCML is knocking holes out of the airlines on MAN-LON.
14 loop is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2006, 16:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leeds
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm reliably told there were 62 on Jet2's MAN-LGW (LS901) this morning, I'm also told that's typical. I'd be surprised if LBA-LGW couldn't match that - and if as a result this meant an aircraft wouldn't have to be leased at all, the financial case is surely worth looking at. I think trying use the evidence of routes flown on a full service basis to guage the potential of the same route being done on a low fares basis, is potentially misleading. NCL-BRS, NCL-STN, NCL-BFS, BRS-BFS, LBA-BRS and LBA-DUB all spring to mind.
682ft AMSL is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2006, 17:48
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Leeds to London flights don't work as well as Manch to London flights for two reasons (apart from the obvious difference in size between Manchester and Leeds market)
1. The East Coast Main Line works and has worked for years
2. The M1 takes you from Leeds City Centre straight down to Brent Cross.

With Manchester, the West Coast Main Line, although better, is still not there and driving is unthinkable.
Jet2 do offer an early morning flight that is significantly cheaper than Virgin Trains on almost every count. I intend to use it more regularly from now on having just tried it for the first time.
VHF FLYER is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2006, 18:33
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Leeds to LGW has never worked for anyone.
Most would say 733's to the likes of BFS, AMS, CDG, PRG, BCN would never have worked from LBA until LS proved there is a healthy market.

LBA-LGW has never been done low-cost, in fact neither has BD's LBA-LHR in comparison to fares offered from MAN.

MAN has what, around 30 flights to 4 LON airports each day, to compared to LBA's 4 flights to 1 LON airport?

The Virgin rail services on MAN-LON have improved significantly recently, hence the drop in air passengers, but taking into account the catchment areas of MAN and LBA, flights and fares offered have always been disproportionately in favour of MAN.
Jet2LBA is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2006, 18:41
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Little Town New Jersey
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flightrider

Start of the summer season and engineering inputs are running late, so leased aircraft in for a month. You have to remember Jet2 also have Royal mail skynet commitments at night hence not full utilisiation at all bases. Man-Lgw traffic still being built on, Ba have done this route for a long time so it is going to be slow.


The Gimp
Crewing Gimp is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2006, 19:26
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leeds
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VHF FLYER
(apart from the obvious difference in size between Manchester and Leeds market)
do you mean the air market or the total air + rail + road market. Can't believe given the relative size of the 2 cities and their hinterlands, that the total market is massively different. It's important as well to recongnise the difference between the market to central London - where rail has an obvious advantage - and the market to South London, the regions South of London and of course Gatwick itself - where it doesn't. As I said, BACX were getting 29 punters on the J41, paying a fortune. Growing that market to the 60 odd that Jet2 are getting out of MAN should be possible.

Crewing Gimp - there are no mail flights ex-Leeds, but Leeds appears to have the worst utilisation? There looks to be so much more that could be done.
682ft AMSL is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2006, 20:17
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SE of Compton
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VHF FLYER

2. The M1 takes you from Leeds City Centre straight down to Brent Cross.

It does indeed! But driving Leeds to London is also unthinkable! I live in Berkshire with family in Yorkshire and in the North West. Categorically the drive on the M6 (the toll road has made a huge difference) and M40 is far better than the M1 which has deteriorated in the 10 years that I've been down south!

Like 682 I'm not sure there is a big difference in the TOTAL travel market Leeds-London vs Manchester-London. If you think there is, you may not have visited Leeds recently!
14 loop is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.