Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Low stocks of JetA-1 at LHR?

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Low stocks of JetA-1 at LHR?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Dec 2005, 11:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Londinium, UK
Age: 51
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low stocks of JetA-1 at LHR?

Daily Mirror reporting 30% reduction in JetA-1 stocks at LHR and Airlines being asked to fill their tanks elsewhere.

Is there any operational impact for anyone?
CherokeeDriver is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2005, 11:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Iceland
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was there yeasterday around noon, and the rep told us that the burning depot supplyed 25% of LHR fuel but "everybody is bringing in their own" she said, but that naturally only appl to the shorthaul traffi
Packsonflight is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2005, 11:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Camp X-Ray
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well we're expected to land out 747s with 40T in the tanks and the shorthaulers are tankering in the whole fuel load for the next sector ex-LHR!
Hand Solo is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2005, 11:41
  #4 (permalink)  
VP8
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Still in the Midland Radar overhead
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Latest we have from Air BP

This is managed by Heathrow airport, it applies to all customers and all airlines. Air BP (through our into-plane pool) is merely executing the protocol, as will all other oil suppliers. Heathrow airport will have communicated the protocol directly to all affected airlines.

The rationing is effective immediately, with exception for aircraft currently en route to LHR. The duration is undetermined sofar.
We confirm that 30% shortage of supply is applicable.
This implies:
a 15% reduction for Long Haul home based carriers
a 36% reduction for Short Haul home based carriers
a 36% reduction for Long Haul visiting carriers
a 60% reduction for Short Haul visiting carriers
Long Haul is defined as longer than 5 hours.

Air BP is working with the other suppliers at LHR to seek alternative fuel supply to the airport.



VEEPS
VP8 is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2005, 12:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Notam !!

AGA : Q)EGTT/QFULT/IV/NBO/A/000/999/5129N00028W005
FROM 05/12/13 18:33 TO 05/12/31 23:59 EST A2706/05
E)HEATHROW AIRPORT IS EXPERIENCING REDUCED DELIVERIES OF JET FUEL.
IN ORDER TO ENSURE CONTINUANCE OF OPS, THE ARRANGEMENTS AGREED IN THE
DRAFT HEATHROW FUEL CONTINGENCY PLAN (HFCP) WILL APPLY WIE.
THERE ARE SOME RESERVE STOCKS, BUT THESE NEED TO BE BEST USED IN
ORDER TO SAFEGUARD OPS.
ALL INBOUND ACFT WILL MAXIMISE TANKERING OPPORTUNITIES. IN ADDITION
TO TANKERING, FUEL RESTRICTIONS WILL ALSO APPLY.
USING THE HFCP, EACH CARRIER WILL, ON A DAILY BASIS, BE ALLOCATED A
PERCENTAGE OF THE PREVIOUS WEEKS TOTAL UPLIFT. THIS ALLOCATION CAN BE
USED AT AIRLINES DISCRETION.
ALL DEPARTING ACFT WILL RECIEVE FUEL, BUT ON A REDUCED BASIS -
(REFLECTING NORMAL CONTINGENCY PRACTICE WORLDWIDE). THE FOLLWING
RESTRICTIONS APPLY:
VISITING CARRIERS
FLTS UP TO 5 HR DURATION WILL RECIEVE 40 PER CENT OF NORMAL UPLIFT
FLTS OVER 5 HR DURATION WILL RECIEVE 64 PER CENT OF NORMAL UPLIFT
BASE CARRIERS
IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE OPERATIONAL INTEGRITY OF THE AIRFIELD AND
ENSURE STAND AVAILABILITY THE 3 BASE CARRIERS WILL HAVE THE FOLLOWING
ALLOCATION:
FLTS UP TO 5 HR DURATION WILL RECIEVE 64 PER CENT OF NORMAL UPLIFT
FLTS OVER 5 HR DURATION WILL RECIEVE 85 PER CENT OF NORMAL UPLIFT
CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN TO LONG RANGE AIRLINES WHO NEED TO
ESTABLISH INTERIM OPERATIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. AIRLINES IN THIS CATEGORY
SHOULD CONTACT THE AIRSIDE BUSINESS RECOVERY TEAM ON 0208 745 7582 TO
ESTABLISH AN AGREEMENT.
THE SITUATION WILL BE MONITORED DAILY AND AIRLINES PERFORMANCE
MEASURED, WITH NOTAM ISSUED AS REQUIRED.
FOR INFO, THE FOLLOWING WILL NOT BE AFFECTED:
- ACFT HAVING ALREADY DEPARTED THEIR LAST POINT INBOUND TO HEATHROW
ON 13 DEC 05
- LONG RANGE ACFT ALREADY ON THE GROUND AT HEATHROW ON 13 DEC 05
WE APPEAL TO ALL OPERATORS TO WORK WITH US TO MAINTAIN THE HEATHROW
OPERATION
STN Ramp Rat is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2005, 12:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So now we have to "panic buy" Jet fuel as well as fuel for the car?
I also had to panic buy some more dosmestic heating oil, this is getting difficulut to keep up with.
BMed Boy is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2005, 13:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,504
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
fokker
It must have been written by the dyslexic notam writer, the other one specialises in confusion.
brakedwell is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2005, 15:00
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: York International
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This will create chaos for the Christmas rush, non LHR based long haul will have to tech stop on the way home with the resultant delays and crewing problems.
Fly747 is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2005, 15:04
  #9 (permalink)  
The SSK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I hear there are political problems with the US (breach of the terms of Bermuda 2?). Watch this space.
 
Old 15th Dec 2005, 00:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Camp X-Ray
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't see the septics kicking up too much of a stink about this particular force majeur. The only routes it's likely to affect are the non-stop LAX and SFO. AA and UA have plenty more short routes from the East coast that they can use to tanker in fuel and thus divert the majority of their fuel ration to the long range stuff. BA are already tankering in 40T/27T on their 744/777s respectively, it's not like they're gaining a competitive advantage.
Hand Solo is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2005, 10:24
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm Sweden
Age: 74
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
septics kicking up too much of a stink
I assume you mean sceptics, as septics always kick up a stink if the lid is off!
Swedish Steve is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2005, 10:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Moved back to enemy territory... Leeds!!
Age: 49
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
septics kicking up too much of a stink
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I assume you mean sceptics, as septics always kick up a stink if the lid is off!


Septic tanks= Yanks
Frankfurt_Cowboy is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2005, 11:17
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Swedish Steve

er.. where exactly is Stockhplm ///
TyroPicard is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2005, 11:22
  #14 (permalink)  


Sims Fly Virtually
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Used to be 3rd Sand Dune from the Left - But now I'm somewhere else somewhere else.
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Swedish - apologies - we sometimes forget that not all of the world understands British "Cockney Rhyming Slang"

Apples & Pears = Stairs
Trouble and Strife = Wife
Septic Tanks = Yanks

But it looks like ther's a serious problem - hopefully all those relying on heating oil "back home" this Christmas will not be freezing, and that the airline industry does not have yet another major set-back in already troubled times.

Good luck to all (from where it's 23 and drops to a frigid 10 degrees at night and I complain bitterly
ExSimGuy is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2005, 11:31
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chamonix
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some foreign Long Haul carriers are appealing the decision to treat foreign and local carriers differently (64% vs 85%).

Although I can see the logic in the decision, one should be very careful that, in the future, this doesnt come back to bite BA/VS

SYD - for example - has 'fuel rationing' for a period almost every year (due to refining capacity) and all carriers are treated the same (including QF).

BA/VS might find that the current situation is setting a precedent that my come back to haunt them.

Aviation, as we are all aware, has a long memory.

Cathay are planning on Tech Stops in AMS I understand. The only people that will be happy will be the plane-spotters!
petitfromage is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2005, 12:38
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are routing North to US or Canadian West Coast surely makes more sense to pop in Manchester...?

We have lots of fuel and fast turn around ......and its probably cheaper than STN

all diversions gratefully rec'd as ever !
Bagso is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2005, 13:01
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: bedlam
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yikes! the fuel burn and COST to QF for those LHR-STN sectors must be ASTRONOMICAL!!! thats all we need... Running any kind of B747 on short hops aint good.
ALLDAYDELI is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2005, 13:42
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Manchester?? Fast turn round?????????????????????

Is that the Manchester just off the M56 or a different one to the one that has WIP all over the place, chronic congection due illogical taxiway planning and Handling that (deleted on legal advice)?

The only thing holding the place together is the exceelent GMC guys who were presumably world class jugglers in a previous life.
yeoman is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2005, 13:46
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Surrey, UK ;
Age: 71
Posts: 1,155
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Fuel Cost

Am I missing something ??? we are talking about Stansted ??? Surely if they have got enough surpolus fuel, it would be cheaper and easier to tanker it by road to LHR, than to fly a 747 and pax to Stansted. ????

Dave Gittins is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2005, 14:05
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How many road tankers do you thing it takes to haul 100 tonnes of fuel to LHR? Now multiply that by the number of 747s going to STN to refuel. Then factor in the time it takes to offload this fuel into the LHR system following all the quality checks on each and every tankerload. Then repeat this everyday until fuel stocks are back to normal. You get the picture?

I bet the duty hours are going to be interesting on a two sector duty with the a 13 hour second sector!
Carnage Matey! is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.