Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Highest airport in the UK

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Highest airport in the UK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Feb 2006, 20:06
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South of Iceland
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.... highest landing in Scotland ...?

I know that a floatplane has been landed on Loch Patak (northwest of Loch Ericht - near Dalwhinnie on the A9)

1800ft - is that the highest ever fixed wing landing in the UK ?
Captain Mayday is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2006, 15:37
  #22 (permalink)  
Fit like min?
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ...
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excluding beaches, seaplanes etc, Dundee is something like 13ft AGL?
Richard Taylor is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2006, 17:18
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Montréal, Québec
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Richard Taylor
Excluding beaches, seaplanes etc, Dundee is something like 13ft AGL?
Was about to suggest Barra, since with the tides it's height above or below actual sea level changes fairly frequently

*j*
jamesbrownontheroad is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2006, 08:37
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tracy Island
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Lydd ferryfield ashford international london marsh airport is below sea level,if its still there.
Kak Klaxon is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2006, 15:52
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The middle
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Highest (successful) fixed wing landing in the UK must surely be the top of Helvellyn in the Lake District. There is a plaque commemorating the event just below the summit, which happened in the 20s or 30s.
excrab is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2006, 16:31
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: On the move
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All seems rather tame if you consider landing in Johannesburg at around 6000ft (1830m) above sea level.Probably 2 x times Ben Nevis.
wawkrk is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2006, 17:49
  #27 (permalink)  

Brunel to Concorde
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Virtute et Industria, et Sumorsaete Ealle
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wawkrk
All seems rather tame if you consider landing in Johannesburg at around 6000ft (1830m) above sea level.Probably 2 x times Ben Nevis.
Factually you are of course correct, but in practice the position of an airport relative to its surroundings can give an illusion of seeming high whilst other, much higher airports, appear 'normally' situated.

For example, I have flown out of Denver Airport (over 5,000 feet elevation) but, because of the surrounding topography, can't recall thinking, "Hey, this is perched on top of a mountain".

Whereas when I travel from my local airport at BRS (the second highest commmercial airport in the UK at over 600 feet) the clear impression is gained that the airport is quite high up because the coast is only a few miles away and in view (except when the notorious BRS mists descend).
MerchantVenturer is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2006, 22:25
  #28 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As Dash 7 says, at 19ftAMSL Sumburgh may not be the lowest, but I'd like to bet it's the only airport where an Airport Fireman has had his arm broken by a Cormerant, he was clearing seaweed from the runway after a high tide and a gale, but failed to notice the entangled fish within said seaweed, which said bird was eyeing up fo an easy breakfast.

When faced with the competition, the cormerant did precisely what a bird has to do to get that meal.
niknak is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2006, 06:45
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MerchantVenturer
Factually you are of course correct, but in practice the position of an airport relative to its surroundings can give an illusion of seeming high whilst other, much higher airports, appear 'normally' situated.
For example, I have flown out of Denver Airport (over 5,000 feet elevation) but, because of the surrounding topography, can't recall thinking, "Hey, this is perched on top of a mountain".
Wouldn't disagree there either....BA used to fly CCS/BOG (Caracas/Bogata). Whereas CCS was just above sealevel (a few hundred feet), it looked much more dramatic than BOG at 8500ft amsl.

Within a few (3 or 4nm?) south of CCS the terrain rose to about 6000ft, whereas at BOG the airfield was on a high plain of 8000 ft with some terrain to 11000ft within 15 miles, and therefore much less dramatic.

Perofmance on take off was, however, a different matter

Edited to add - AMS at -11ft is possibly the largest airport below sea level
TopBunk is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:41.


Copyright © MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.