Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

BA Departures from KJFK

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

BA Departures from KJFK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jun 2005, 15:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: T2
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA Departures from KJFK

Hi all,

I departed JFK last night, as SLF on UA. This allowed me to listen in to ATC communications on UA's audio system.

Departures were using 13R and Arrivals 13L.

However, I noticed that 3 BA 747s insisted on 13L "for operational reasons" after being given taxi instructions to 13R from Kennedy Ground.

Not being familiar with JFK, I just assumed the Speedbird crews were insisting on a longer runway for optimal performance. I've since had a look in my Jeppesen Manual (for ATPL Flight Planning exam) and noticed that 13R is actually a significantly longer runway. The Departure procedures (looks like we flew a Bette Two Departure) seem the same for both runways.

Assuming my Jepp manual is correct, (which it may not), I'm wondering why would Ground clear BA to 13R? Would Delivery not have already approved a plan including 13L? Secondly, Why did BA insist on 13L when 13R is the longer runway?

Appreciate any responses.
CarbHeatIn is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2005, 15:46
  #2 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a shorter distance from Terminal 7 (the BA terminal) to 13L so it could save a significant amount of taxi time, assuming you don't have to wait forever for landing aircraft. That's the most plausible explanation.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2005, 16:09
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: T2
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HF, thanks for the reply. I thought about taxi distances, but the difference didn't appear that significant. Other operators out of Term 7, including UA and IB didn't query the runway. Perhaps it's significant that BA is the profitable one!

Are Fuel costs really that tightly inforced at BA? It was more like an insistance rather than a request in all 3 cases. With the ever increasing price of fuel can we expect BA heavies to insist on 27L/09R at EGLL?

Interestingly a Jetblue A320 also requested the left, but this was refused.
CarbHeatIn is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2005, 17:31
  #4 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess it's up to the controller at the time as to whether he'll allow it or not. Depends how the departure fits in with others and with arrivals. I've requested 13L myself in the past and been sent to 13R. As you say, the distance isn't that much different. However, there are an awful lot more opportunities for someone to get ahead of you while you're taxiing to 13R.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2005, 20:42
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: on the edge
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are no issues using 13L as long as ATC are happy and that all the performance parameters are not compromised in any way. It can save a huge amount of time.
DarkStar is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 19:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The BA aircraft may have been B777-300s, which I think I'm right in saying are not allowed over the taxiway bridges due to the single-wheel loading. The A340-600 in my airline is similarly restricted.
scroggs is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 20:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 498
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
However BA only have 777-200s, not -300s.
Liffy 1M is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2005, 08:17
  #8 (permalink)  
Too mean to buy a long personal title
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,968
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
And there's only one 772 a day scheduled to JFK (and only 6 days a week) - all the rest are 744s. And the OP did say 747s ...
Globaliser is online now  
Old 12th Jun 2005, 17:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, it was a guess! It is certainly an issue for us (A346), and I believe the B773 is similarly restricted, but I'm not sure about the B772. The B744 has no such restriction. I can't think of any other obvious explanation for what you heard.
scroggs is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.