Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Gulf Air 151

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd May 2005, 12:51
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Gulf
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FokkerWokker, sorry to say that your faith in Baywatcher's sources is totally unfounded. As I am sure that if both of you had any serious time in GF you would not come up with a statement that the Capt invovled is H.A. nephew.
Great sources
mogley is offline  
Old 2nd May 2005, 14:46
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bah
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What seems to be overlooked is that GFs insurers in London read about these sort of events on these & other boards. And guess what if (after investigation) it 'holds water' up go the premiums, which are quite high enough after 3 losses since the A320 at AUH.

Remember the Malaysian 747's landing @ LHR with 1 or 2 tons of fuel left a few years back. Well, (i'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong) it doesn't happen any more, who sorted that?

PPrune has its uses.
Pandy is offline  
Old 2nd May 2005, 15:21
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: universe
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bet the insurers had a field day with Emirates after the Joburg incident. Not to mention nearly stalling a 310 in DXB, let he who is without sin cast the first stone!
vfenext is offline  
Old 3rd May 2005, 02:23
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Obvious
Age: 78
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But why did this aircraft hit trees well off the end of a 12,000ft plus runway?

Was it at night? Was it a pitch-up illusion?

OR WHAT?
Belgique is offline  
Old 4th May 2005, 05:06
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Manchester.UK
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

I would say take-off performance calculations worked out for a full length departure from the longer and/or 'obstacle free' runway whereas actual departure was from an intersection on a shorter and/or 'obstacle penalised' runway. Blended with copious ammounts of face saving.



Pontious is offline  
Old 5th May 2005, 16:01
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: universe
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you not going to mention the copious amounts of speculation by people who have no facts? Guilty til proven innocent it seems, hope you never find yourself in that situation.
vfenext is offline  
Old 15th May 2005, 13:26
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: bahrain
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speculation, it had to be very close to the approach lights for 03R,
maybe then there would be no speculation.
lifeb4767 is offline  
Old 15th May 2005, 13:52
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with you vfe next, but it IS a rumour network so let them ramble on....the facts will surface in due time...
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 16th May 2005, 22:27
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 724
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No. This is indeed just another Middle Eastern cover-up and save face exersize.

Jee man. How low can you go (literally) with an airplane?
fox niner is offline  
Old 17th May 2005, 10:20
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Manchester.UK
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Or if they departed off their intended runway, maybe they based their calculations upon the ZFW instead of the TOW. They would give a low Flex & low Vspeeds but realistically the aircraft would gobble up MUCH more runway. Either way, a 'ground strike' followed by an immediate return is a hazard & unfortunately the nature of the job. NOT landing immediately is tantermount to wreckless endangerment especially if it is to save face!

Comments Ironbutt? Vfenext?

Pontious is offline  
Old 17th May 2005, 14:39
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
heard so many variations on the theme, that it would be irresponsible for me to comment, and none of these from official, or sources "in the know", just a bunch of pilots in the ops room, speculating like the folks here...so gonna wait and see what the outcome of the investigation is.....
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 18th May 2005, 02:58
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What to do??? wait and see...glad I wasn't onboard either..or the J'burg one either...
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 18th May 2005, 09:45
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Manchester.UK
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Ironbutt

The EK Jo'burg crew made the correct decision and landed ASAP therefore not jeopardising the crew, pax and aircraft by continuing for a 7+ hour pressurised flight. The 'Captain' of the Gulf Air 151 flight did not.

The pax contributing information, producing visible evidence and bringing it to the attention of the crew only for it to be ignored beggars belief.

We've been here before, at a place called Kegworth.


Feel free to post the outcome of the 'investigation' here. I haven't had a good laugh in ages.

Pontious is offline  
Old 18th May 2005, 10:09
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not comparing the two...not criticizing either crew...ek rushed things and fired the crew...no? then hired them back... GF take it's time and sort it out properly the first time (I hope)...
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 18th May 2005, 10:12
  #55 (permalink)  
The Cooler King
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In the Desert
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funny how in some cases, with some pilots.....that just the sound of something unusual is enough to justify a return to the airport for safety reasons.... no screaming or irate pax required.....

http://www.airliners.net/open.file?i...=837323&size=L

I'm telling you, I've had it flying with Gulf and the other 'save face at all costs' airlines!
Farrell is offline  
Old 18th May 2005, 11:27
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good Farrell...stay away...hippity hop 'round your own country...find an airline that hasn't had a misadventure...what about the lying and covering up during the concorde investigation....metal strip??? what about the wheel spacer missing, and other evidence "sequestered" by the French investigators, and denied inspection by the other involved parties....
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 18th May 2005, 17:56
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Landan!
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil Skinny Dog and thingyme bay

You might find your imaginary dog not in some miaginary bay but closer to you in Abu Dhabi where he is this time and after much trying somwhere else to run his own airline. Still with no log entries but with the captain's stripes!

We are pleased to announce though that the airline industry is showing positive growth after all these positive climbs as Abu Dhabi Airport now have a dedicated service for clearing up the runways from the unsuspected bits of rubber of unknown origin found on a daily basis!

As a matter of fact GAMCO have announced the opening of their new retreading facility in the hangar and trap shutting ward in their clinic.

gccpro is offline  
Old 18th May 2005, 23:37
  #58 (permalink)  
The Cooler King
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In the Desert
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ironbutt57........whoa! dude, relax there........just a joke man! Jesus!......

If your around the Wisconsin area in June, PM me and we'll go for a Blue Moon or a steak!

Sorry to have p*ssed you off!



oh and ..... I'm not French....I'm Irish......we don't cover up anything!
Farrell is offline  
Old 20th May 2005, 10:21
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Manchester.UK
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

I'm not impressed with GF's safety standards. Flew recently DXB-BAH on an A320.Some pax never switched their mobile phones off until the aircraft was well into the air, despite the PA by the crew saying they weren't to be used during the flight. I tried to tell some of the cabin crew but all I got was a shrug, some pax smoked openly... the list was endless. Suffice it to say for the return I flew back to DXB with my own carrier. I will NEVER travel with GF again!
Pontious is offline  
Old 20th May 2005, 17:02
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Manchester.UK
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

If I'd known about some of the horror stories that the ex-GF F/O's now in EK tell about sim'details they've witnessed while at GF then I wouldn't have travelled GF in the first place!

Pontious is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.