Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

BA Bank Holiday Chaos

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

BA Bank Holiday Chaos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Aug 2004, 15:47
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Right there under the stair
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thinking about what pprecious said about automated check in, maybe that's the way things will go, a dispatcher told me today that easyJet actually dispatched a flight where all the pax checked in electronically.

I would suggest, make hay while the sunshines because if this is the case some people's days in their jobs are numbered.
Diverse is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2004, 16:12
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Fantasy Island
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thirdly, to somebody's post regarding BA's economy service, i would say you get preferential treatment as you are airline staff, otherwise economy passenger's are treated like crap, and that's a known fact in the company.
This is absolute bollocks. I flew over 30 economy sectors with BA last year, on a range of routes, and have absolutely no complaints.

Please do not tar your airborne colleagues with the same "we don't give a ****" attitude that you express towards your customers.

BahrainLad is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2004, 16:40
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that when a similar strike occurred last year, our CEO was off to Hong Kong on holiday with his family on CX, what does that say about how much he/she values the customers?
Errr, so that must have been his doppelganger in the Compass centre then? Perhaps you ought to engage your brain instead of listening to the rubbish your union leaders spout.
Carnage Matey! is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2004, 17:01
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: london
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I’m travelling out of Heathrow over the bank holiday – but on a Star Alliance partner from a terminal with – I think - only limited BA presence.

Any predications as to the level of knock on disruption I am likely to have to put up with?


PS How do the pay, terms and conditions of BA check in staff compare with other carriers operating out of Heathrow and Gatwick?
payingpax is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 00:05
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you stay out of T1 there should be no knock on effect except your flights and the car parks being full.

PPS. BA check in staff are the best paid at LHR plus they have a final salary pension, flexible working hours and discount staff travel. Haven't seen many of them jacking it in to work for Aviance and Servisair.
Carnage Matey! is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 01:19
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mike Street is the Director who is dealing with the pay negotiations that have now stalled and it looks as if a strike is likely. He has wide experience of messing things up. He handled the takover of Dan Air into EOG.
He doesn't have much time for people or for fairness. For example the Dan Air seniority list was ignored during the pilot redundancies in 1992 - only those flying B737-3/400 were reatained on the payroll, all other fleet pilots were made redundant despite a written company/union agreement for first in last out. Those that were 'lucky' and retained were given a 10% pay cut. It took years to sort out the mess - court action, union action etc.
fiftyfour is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 03:46
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the ground for now.
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Offering short-term sums of money doesn't get to the heart of the problem. BA's labour costs in the current environment are 100 million to 200 million pounds too high," independent analyst Chris Tarry said. (Reuters).
unmanned transport is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 07:40
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA's labour costs in the current environment are 100 million to 200 million pounds too high
This may be true, but that doesn't have much to do with the present impasse.

Paying some check-in girl who's on 11k a rise of inflation +£300 isn't going to make the slightest bit of difference to BA's woes.

Skippy had the chance to sort out BA's pay structure after 9-11 and he blew it - trying to cut back on the lowest paid employees, who, lets be honest, have nothing to lose (theres no shortage of jobs in West London paying 11K!) will not make any dent is this supposed 200 million overspend.
Jet II is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 09:44
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There seems to be this idea above that people go on strike for fun !, let me tell you when a person has a wife and kids to support then striking is a last resort.

Ask yourselfs why this dispute has lasted since january ?. Could it be bad mannagement to let a dispute come to a head at the time when the company makes most of its money ?.
A and C is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 10:58
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,631
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Be careful!

BA have already contracted-out parts of its operations. If they think check-in staff and baggage handlers are getting too expensive, I'm sure the likes of Aviance and Servisair will be only too happy to talk to them....
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 12:34
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I note in todays Telegraph:

The airline [BA] employs 47,000 people but has been dogged by absenteeism with staff reporting sick 17 days a year compared with the average of seven days. Union sources said the absenteeism was due to working conditions.

So. BA staff are in the habit of taking an extra two weeks holiday a year compared to other workers. On top of being in the rareified club of final salary pension workers who also enjoy extensive staff travel and unionised job security.

I see no realistic way for BA to drag itself out of this mire.

Other than go bust. Imagine it. They wind the firm up on a Tuesday and then rise it phoneix like from the ashes on a Wednesday. Everything contracted out on the ground to competing firms. New hires recruited on a single union no-strike contract only in essential areas of operations such as cabin crew and flightdeck and engineering.

No final salary pension commitments. The dead half of management not rehired and most deliciously those damn militant baggage chuckers and bus drivers out on their ear into the real world.

The BA brand could have been sold to a holding company along with the slots. The aircraft lease holders would have had to held their assets unused overnight whilst the old BA died and the new BOAC was reborn looking for a whole load of aircraft, a brand and some slots...

This cannot be impossible to engineer surely? Sell off the right to the brand and sell the slots and sell the other essential bits to a ' holding company ' then go bust, then start a New BA and buy back the forementioned.

Got to be a way of slashing 50% of costs in my book.

BEN
Ben Evans is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 12:35
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good point.

Here's hoping that the 75% who either voted no, or abstained turn up for work and be a little more responsible than their colleagues.
pprecious is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 14:01
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,631
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Ben -

Nice idea. Just slightly illegal!!
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 14:18
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not necessarily illegal. As BA owe £3b in debt then there may be scope to sell off assets to repay the debt. Thereby leaving nothing much left of a company to declare insolvent. If nothing else you could move all the existing troublesome BA employees into a wholly owned subsidiary which you could soon declare loss making.

Michael O Leary would have no difficulty in sorting this out under existing UK employment law.

Lets face it. Sour faced buttie slingers, pilfering bag chuckers and dim witted passport checkers are hardly irreplaceable professionals deserving of well perked jobs. Each one can be replaced with less than a weeks training and be on a no-strike contract.

BEN
Ben Evans is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 14:25
  #55 (permalink)  



With MY reputation?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Not fussed, as long as it's "Child Friendly"
Age: 52
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ben,

Judging by your last paragraph, it sounds as if you ARE M.O.L.???
At least you have the same opinions of the workforce

PHX
phoenix son is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 15:38
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like its escalating - the TGWU members have voted overwhelmingly for strike and named the day - August 27.

The union said that 66 per cent of its members working in BA's check-in, sales, and administrative departments voted in favour of a strike while 84 per cent of baggage handlers and other ground staff backed industrial action

The union said the strike will hit Heathrow, Gatwick, Birmingham, Manchester, Edinburgh and Glasgow and will run from 4.30am on August 27.
Jet II is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 15:42
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: BFS
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I'm curious about is how much do they think they should earn? Especially with the attitude displayed above. At the end of the day they took a job knowing what it payed. It's hardly skilled labour - go work somewhere else if you don't like it - but don't mess up what for many people is a once a year event just cos you're not happy.
Having watched this unfold I also feel the so called union officials should be ashamed of their conduct - especially being vague about when the strike will occur. I hope they suffer a backlash from any GMB members trying to travel that day.
And with luck only 25% will walk out and we'll see minimum disruption. To endanger a fragile company in trying times could very easily backfire.

SK
silverknapper is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 15:45
  #58 (permalink)  
Too mean to buy a long personal title
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,968
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Oh well, so off we go into the brinksmanship phase.

Does anyone know who handles EI at LHR?
Globaliser is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 17:13
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: sussex
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its a great shame that any staff in any airline have to go on strike
what it always shows is that the management are woefully poor at explaining the company problems.The department in dispute is led by Mr street.In the last dispute the man in charge was Mr street.Is it not time Mr street went down the road ?
stormin norman is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2004, 18:34
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Right there under the stair
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Absolutely right stormin', I think he is the root of the problem. Doesn't matter what he is as a personality or how he behaves towards his mother, the guy seems to bounce fromone crisis to another.
Diverse is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.