Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Baggage Handlers vote to strike

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Baggage Handlers vote to strike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jul 2004, 12:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Baggage Handlers vote to strike

From Sky news:
Baggage Strike Hits 17 Airports
Baggage handlers at 17 airports, including Heathrow and Gatwick, have voted to strike in a dispute over pay, threatening chaos to summer flights. Transport and General Workers Union members, employed by services group Aviance, overwhelmingly backed walkouts in protest at a 2.5% offer.The union, which has members at 17 airports across the UK, said talks will be held with the company on Wednesday in a bid to avert stoppages.

Workers voted by 658 to 163 in favour of strikes, a majority of 4-1. Industrial action short of a strike was supported by 85% of those who voted.

TGWU national officer Brendan Gold said: "This is a resounding vote by our members which sends a clear signal to Aviance that they must improve on the offer.

"The talks this Wednesday will now take on an added significance. Everyone is aware that aviation is a tough market and nobody is better placed to know that than the baggage handlers and check-in staff.

"They also know that the volume of their work is increasing as the industry gets busier and passenger numbers break record levels.

"That being the case, they know a bad deal when they see one, which is why we urge Aviance to listen to their workforce and act to improve the deal on offer and so avoid a damaging dispute."

Aviance operations are at Aberdeen, Belfast, Birmingham, Cardiff, Coventry, Edinburgh, Gatwick, Glasgow, Heathrow, Jersey, Leeds Bradford, Liverpool, Luton, Manchester, Stansted, Southampton and Teesside airports.
mpenage is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2004, 16:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Work associated address
Age: 42
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yay and we are getting taking over by Aviance this year quite soon should it go through with Ferrovial the Spanish owners of Belfast City!
EGAC_Ramper is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2004, 17:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Walmington on Sea
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aviance at Coventry?..........not any more I don't think.
Ex Oggie is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2004, 23:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Coventry
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No Aviance at CVT

Nope it's the thoroughly nice blokes n gels of Coventry Airport Handling. Amazing how many media have misreported the story.
Skypartners is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2004, 07:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: n/a
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is crazy 2.5% is as good if not a lot better than many flight crew will be getting. According to A TGWU spokeswoman they dont like 2.5% because they got 4.2% last year! So because the employers were generous last year they want the same again. Sack the lot of them.
Daysleeper is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2004, 08:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: belfast
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

EGAC Ramper

Does that mean last years rumours of Menzies is dead in the water?
ALLMCC is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2004, 12:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Daysleeper

It seems to me that you are missing the point here.

2.5% of your wage compared to there wage is a vast increase.

You must understand that these Baggage handlers are just above the Govt minimum wage.

You also failed to mention that the employers also wanted to reduce holidays aswell.

so as for sacking them.... you should be sympathetic towards them..



So says the slug.....
master slug is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2004, 13:14
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Work associated address
Age: 42
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ALLMCC

Indeed the sale to menzies fell through twice and so now Aviance are the sole contenders left.Which non of us want as we'd rather be kept in house.But instead it will be 50/50 between Aviance and Ferrovial.

Can just see the new comany name now !!

Ferrovial Aviance Ground Services FAGS for short!!

And I for one agree with thier strike too,at EGAC we comapred to Aviance are quite well paid and certainly by no means am I rich.So with the sale in mind I'm starting my options for my fATPL training hopefully within next 6months.
EGAC_Ramper is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2004, 13:27
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: n/a
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You must understand that these Baggage handlers are just above the Govt minimum wage.
You also failed to mention that the employers also wanted to reduce holidays aswell.
so as for sacking them.... you should be sympathetic towards them..
I was unaware of the holiday issue and that would change the issue somewhat. However 2.5% is still a good increase at the moment in aviation and 4.2% last year was fantastic.
I dont see what my income has to do with it, what is relevant is the percentage increase (or decrease.) ie where you are now compared to a year ago.
As for just above minimum wages it is at best semi-skilled and mainly unskilled manual labour so you cant expect the same wage as someone in a skilled occupation.
Daysleeper is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2004, 16:00
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UAE
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ac Ramper
- love the pneumonic , much better than Ferroviance or Aviaroverial!

With Aviance being a contractor surely the rates of pay at each station must differ quite considerably. I can`t imagine that they are paying the same amount at Belfast Int as they do at Gatwick or Dublin and did all of Aviance get 4.2% last year? I think not !!
Tower Ranger is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2004, 07:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Percentages are important, my bum!

It's the amount of income these people have above and beyond an acceptable basic standard of living that's important. Another 15p here or there is an absolute nonsense.

It's easy to be blase about others incomes when you easily earn thousands of pounds over and above an acceptable basic wage.

And remember, it's these 'unskilled' people, including your dispatchers, pax agents and load controllers, who ensure your aircraft is safely loaded and fit to fly - all while you use your considerable skills to sit on your bum drinking coffee on the flight deck.
witchdoctor is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2004, 09:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its true that we cannot compare wage rates that of the driver up front and that of the loader.

But lets remind ourselves of what they do. they dont just put bags on a/c, they have to deal with and understand such things as Dangerous goods also have the understanding of Radioactive goods,Teamleaders have to be trained up to Jarop,s Standards.

They are also responsable for makeing sure all hold doors are safely locked and visible checks before departure, Just like yourself. But yet the owners of these handling company's still feel the need to squeeze more out of the workers.

But lets hope all party's see sence and resolve this issue


so says the slug....
master slug is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2004, 09:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Almaty
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Percentages are only relevant to the employer. The employee sees only the increase in their monthly take-home pay. There are always winners and losers in any industry and ours is no exception. But it would be nice to appreciate the efforts of the less well off because there but for the grace of God...........
Harrier46 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2004, 09:42
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: leeds
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aviance appear to operate at many UK airports. Just wondering how many of those listed actually have Aviance-employed baggage handlers. For example, at LBA Aviance do check-in, pax escort and despatch but no baggage. These duties are undertaken by LBA employees (among other tasks), many of whom I believe are GMB members, not TGWU.
hotline is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.