Ba 747 @ Lgw??
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Flackwell Heath
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ba 747 @ Lgw??
Landed at LGW today where i saw a BA 747 sitting with a few people around it! any idea what it was doing there? thought BA operated 777's for there long haul LGW routes?
It was specially flown in from Heathrow to be the first aircraft to taxi under the new Pier 6 / North Terminal bridge. The bridge was hoisted into place around 10 days ago and initial securing works are complete, hence the press event today. Apparently as BA will be the main users of Pier 6, it was deemed appropriate that their largest aircraft was the first to pass under the bridge despite the fact that it is not usually flown from LGW.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FROM GOOGLE - before it 'went up'
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's a link to the BBC News website showing the bridge with traffic!
Looks impressive, but will an A380 fit?
Gatwick Bridge
Looks impressive, but will an A380 fit?
Gatwick Bridge
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The original press blurb I saw made great use of the fact that the A380 would fit underneath, but we all know what they are like.
Cany anyone confirm or deny the A380 question?
Cany anyone confirm or deny the A380 question?
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Al tube.
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surely the bridge has to be high enough to cope with the worst case of a collapsed nose gear? – Just like evacuation slides have to be long enough.
B747-400 Wing span 64.44m (211ft 5in), length 70.67m (231ft 10in), height 19.41m (63ft 8in).
A380-800 Wing span 79.8m (261ft 10in), length 73m (239ft 6in). Height 24,1 m (79ft 1in)
Guess the 380 will not fit!
B747-400 Wing span 64.44m (211ft 5in), length 70.67m (231ft 10in), height 19.41m (63ft 8in).
A380-800 Wing span 79.8m (261ft 10in), length 73m (239ft 6in). Height 24,1 m (79ft 1in)
Guess the 380 will not fit!
Paxing All Over The World
The ARUP web site says
Excuse me?? 'sustainable development' now means adding more steel and concrete, so that even more aircraft can operate? Those kids in marketing are just beyond words.
I trust that they are going to put travelators across the span, or will BAA do their usual trick of saving money?
We applied our expertise on bridge design to a glazed pedestrian link crossing London Gatwick Airport’s busiest taxiway as part of the British Airport Authority’s Pier 6 project - a wider sustainable development project at the airport.
I trust that they are going to put travelators across the span, or will BAA do their usual trick of saving money?
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I honestly cant remember where I read it but it was in the last week or two in either Skyport or Gatwick News that the bridge is actually designed for the A380.....but then again...who nows and after seeing the photo of the 747 under it I would be surprised!!! I got to taxi under it yesterday in a 777 which was kinda exciting mind you!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'sustainable development' now means adding more steel and concrete
I'm guessing - and I don't know for certain - that having more piers is better than remote stands for productivity. Of course, building a second runway would also increase productivity at LGW, but that is not environmentally sustainable!!
I suppose you could argue that construction creates pollution but in the long term surely the new bridge and pier is better for the airport?
Cheers