Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Lgw CarPark X Speedbumps

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Lgw CarPark X Speedbumps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th May 2004, 15:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sussex
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lgw CarPark X Speedbumps

The BAA have gone a bit OTT with the new speed bumps down to Car Park X. If you take them at the placarded speed of 30 you will certainly break your suspension and probably your neck aswell !
Masai is offline  
Old 19th May 2004, 16:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Luton use extra large potholes to control traffic speed
LTNman is offline  
Old 19th May 2004, 16:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Potholes :- so do Manchester Airport, especially on the taxiways.
hapzim is offline  
Old 19th May 2004, 20:30
  #4 (permalink)  

Helicopter Pilots Get It Up Quicker
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location:
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Placarded speeds are LIMITS not targets!

Try slowing down?
pilotwolf is offline  
Old 20th May 2004, 04:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like the sign that says...

"when congested please use car parks"

Yeah right and are BAA going to pay for the car park fee to drop your passengers off...

Think not
eurostar builder is offline  
Old 20th May 2004, 18:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Wherever I lay my hat....
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First traffic calming islands....

....quite literally a pain in the ar$e.....

tech...again is offline  
Old 22nd May 2004, 21:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: gatwick
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bit OTT ...... counted them 24 in total ........ when 12 would have been ok seems that everyone drives down the white line anyway to avoid them ...
jmccrew is offline  
Old 23rd May 2004, 10:11
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Not quite Sure
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ARRRGGGGHHHH

Yeah i found it's a real bastard, cos when your a bit late to get in, you will have to drive over the "centerline" to avaid those nasty humps, so than it's a case of hoping you won't "bump" into anyone if you do!!!!!!
Another brilliant idea of the marvelous BAA!!!

cheerio
kooyheier is offline  
Old 23rd May 2004, 15:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who do I send the claim to for my new suspension ?

It took me exactly 4 minutes today to drive the 1.2 miles from the X exit to the last bump. Thats 18 mph, and was acheived by driving down the centreline on a few of them ! No way near the 30 mph limit, which, IMHO, is a daft, low limit anyway, the perimeter road is much busier and is a 40 !
expedite_climb is offline  
Old 23rd May 2004, 16:14
  #10 (permalink)  

Helicopter Pilots Get It Up Quicker
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location:
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I d be worried if driving over them at a sensible speed damgaged the suspension of any properly maintained car

Would be interesting to know who is actually responsible for the setting of the speed limit as the road are subject to normal road traffic act rules and regulations. So BAA or local council?

Also with regards to the Perimeter Road having a 40 mph limit I have attended several serious accidents along it in th epast couple of years and all but one involved a vehicle waiting to turn - maybe thats the logic behind it?

And that little stretch of road with the humps has had 2 FATAL accidents in a similar time span - both air/cabin crew I believe

PW
pilotwolf is offline  
Old 23rd May 2004, 19:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PW - although I dont know the details of those fatal accidents, I'd wager they had something to do with the horrendous unlit bollards that used to be there.

As for suspension - I'm not talking about short time damage to suspension, but surely driving over 48 nasty bumps EVERY day I go to work cant do it any good ?

As for who sets the rules - BAA I think. The speed limits are not government ones but black boards.
expedite_climb is offline  
Old 23rd May 2004, 23:16
  #12 (permalink)  

Helicopter Pilots Get It Up Quicker
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location:
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E_C.. obviously here isn't the appropiate place to discuss details of the accidents - they and their causes were reported on excessive, (correctly and incorrectly as is the press way), in the local papers at the time. The last one which involved a cabin crew member was, I believe, was what prompted the installation of the islands and 'bollards'.

I may be wrong but I thought the signs were as per the statutory design for speed limits?

As for the humps - I understood they were going to be the table type humps rather than what 'we' got... but how many people have to traverse these things in and out of their 'estates' every day?

Not saying they are the right solution or the wrong one but they are better than speed cameras or another death surely?

Alternatively buy a 4x4 - ours has a wheel base that just fits over them

PW
pilotwolf is offline  
Old 24th May 2004, 08:07
  #13 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand there are 27 in each direction (a touch of 'overkill'?). The Airlinks busses are now running about 5 minutes late on all journeys and their drivers reckon they cross about 1500 of them in a day! I suspect there will be a few 'industrial injury claims' forthcoming. Apparently their busses miss the humps with the front wheels but the double set at the back catches them, not to mention the cars in the middle of the road.

Speed there does most definitely need to be controlled but both attempts by BAA seem to be misguided? Why not speedcams? Should make a fortune.
BOAC is offline  
Old 24th May 2004, 08:40
  #14 (permalink)  
Just another number
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If there were to be an accident at the far end of the road, the delay to the ambulance caused by these humps could be critical. On the return journey it would be difficult to treat the patient while passing over 27 humps

Airclues
Captain Airclues is offline  
Old 25th May 2004, 01:50
  #15 (permalink)  

Helicopter Pilots Get It Up Quicker
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location:
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually they are narrow enough for both ambulances and the buses to pass over without touching them....

So maybe the bus delays due to having to slow to avoid those cars driving down the middle of the road?!
pilotwolf is offline  
Old 25th May 2004, 07:17
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilotwolf,

Sorry, but in the case of the airlinks coaches, you are wrong. And they look like fairly standard busses to me !

It seems when sizing up the speedbumps someone forgot that there are 4 wheels at the back as opposed to the 2 at the front.

I've made 6 bus journeys over the bumps this week, and on every one, the front of the bus goes over the bump without touching it, but the back bumps over it. As already BOAC stated above.
expedite_climb is offline  
Old 25th May 2004, 11:21
  #17 (permalink)  

Helicopter Pilots Get It Up Quicker
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location:
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E_C etc

..strange as I thought some research would have gone into the design for the width for this very reason. Or are the buses catching the one on the other side?

Don't use the buses so was basing comments on watching the one in front last week. And our 4x4's tyre just brush the bottom of the slopping part.

Will go and watch the buses next week when I back at work... make a change from plane spotting

PW
pilotwolf is offline  
Old 25th May 2004, 15:31
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sunrise Senior Living
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Expedite_climb is right - the bus's front wheels just straddle the speedbumps, but the rear inboard wheels catch them. Sit in the centre of the bus to avoid being thrown up and down.

Another example of ill thought out 'traffic calming' measures. It's bad enough being consigned to Camp X-Ray without the insult of these wretched devices which seem either to slow the traffic to 15mph or, when it's fairly quiet, to throw all the traffic into the middle of the road.

How long until the next RTA? Think again BAA - I assume our Airlines are paying for all this!!

Cheers
mcdhu
mcdhu is offline  
Old 25th May 2004, 16:43
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: England
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whose BRIGHT idea was it to put ALL those speed bumps on that road !
Are they ALL necessary ?
Its actually more dangerous now as everybody is playing 'chicken' to get through the middle of them , and as for my poor suspension and exhaust, whose going to foot the bill !!?


buffy747 is offline  
Old 25th May 2004, 17:14
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To answer your questions Buffers,

Whose BRIGHT idea was it to put ALL those speed bumps on that road !
BAA


Are they ALL necessary ?
Well we all know what the BAA do must be right and adhered to so they must be necessary.

Speed restrictions are necessary on that stretch of road but I agree with you that the speed bumps are a menace, the traffic islands I thougth were fine. Anyway it is another way of BAA wasting money, no doubt they will have another bright idea for the road in a years time. Oh well, carry on gatwick!
Gauntlet is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.