Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

security

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Mar 2004, 13:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: brisbane, australia
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up security

With all this talk about terrorist plots and terrorism threats today, why have the government not thought about making sure that the airports today are safe. Look how easy it would be to smuggle a gun on board. All you would need is abot 5- 10 people to be in on it and you would have a problem. Give a gun to one person who could be a truck driver or cleaner, they would have it in thier belt or strapped onto their leg and walk on board, leave it in the toilet. Another person in mid flight would go get it and then use it and the public would wonder why this happened. When will the government think about this.

Last edited by AT463; 22nd Mar 2004 at 13:26.
AT463 is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2004, 14:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middlesesx
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AT463 take the rest of the day off ?
HZ123 is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2004, 17:17
  #3 (permalink)  
LBAir
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
AT453 Cabin crew are required to carry out multiple searches of their aircraft prior to departure, whilst I am sure it is possibe to get a gun onboard an aircraft, I don't think it would be quite so easy.

And secondly to that AT453. Do you think telling the world on the internet how easy it could possible be to carry out such a barbaric attact, potentially killing hundreds of people, is such a wise thing to do? Please use your knogging!!!!!
 
Old 23rd Mar 2004, 12:53
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: brisbane, australia
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All I am saying to people out there is that it can be a possibility. Look at the United States, did they not have just metal detectors and such prior to the attack on the world trade center. Surely it shos that all the security and all the precortions that are taken by the government that it showed that it was possible.
AT463 is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2004, 14:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: belfast
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Surely the original post on this subject should have been deleted or at least moderated - it borders on insurgency!
ALLMCC is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2004, 16:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: midlands
Age: 46
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
security issues like the one in the original post should be kept to
one,s self, I agree with allmcc delete delete delete.
cargohappy is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2004, 16:09
  #7 (permalink)  
Not Manchester
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Salford
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh, right.............like the bad guys haven't already thought of that one without reading Pprune.

Running round in circles, clucking loudly and repeating "The sky is falling, the sky is falling" does not, in my view, constitute an effective response to the threat of terrorism.

A threat which, I might add, we in the UK have faced on a daily basis since the 1970s and not just since September 2001.

In this situation, paranoia is every bit as dangerous as complacency.
Caslance is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.