Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

bmibaby/AIr Wales make agreement

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

bmibaby/AIr Wales make agreement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Mar 2004, 01:10
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: thelandofnod
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the only winner is Air Wales. Someone mentioned sharing profits. With a 42 and the fares qouted maybe that should read sharing losses. Wonder if an LBA/LCY is on the cards with this cosy alliance.
runawayedge is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2004, 02:29
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North of the border
Age: 71
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well said Scottish Flyer.

Hopefully the service will do all right. I would rather have an ATR than have the service withdrawn altogether.
Runway 31 is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2004, 00:21
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,685
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 24 Posts
Well that was the Kiss of Death.

In parallel with a couple of us writing here that LCC AirTran run a commuter operation in the US using Air Wisconsin RJs, Air Tran announced they were giving the arrangement up !

http://www.businesswire.com/webbox/b.../240655494.htm
WHBM is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2004, 07:41
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well as they say in wales, yacky dar
dada is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2004, 20:20
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Barry, S.Wales
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CARDIFF LOOSE A/C TO MAN

BMI BABY AT CWL ARE HAVING AN A/C TAKEN FROM THEM DUE TO EXPANDING BUSINESS IN MANCHESTER WHICJ IS WHERE AIR WALES STEPPED IN
rsutt1 is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2004, 20:26
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: England
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Knowing the loads on the Baby routes I think this is good news.

PIK & CRK do not make sense on 737. The longer PRG, AGP,ALC CDG, BGY, PMI routes are going well and the load factors are good. Hopefully new routes will follow.

As for Air Wales being the only winner, my understanding is that BMI have done their homework on this and the contract is good news for the group.

It's just a shame that it could not be kept in house with regional but then they've gone totally Embraer and don't want anything to do with Turboprops.
alterego is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2004, 22:29
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All sides appear to win from this deal, its is also good news for the Airport and the people of South Wales.
As has been said before the domestic routes were previously covered by British Regional with smaller aircraft predominantly the J41 so the ATR42 is a wise move.
Should this succeed then there can only be room for yet more routes and future growth, I understand that there will be an increase on frequency on some of the domestic routes already with this code share.
I expect there will be a number of changes along the next few months which the normal gloom and doom merchants who have a real downer on anything connected with Cardiff and Wales will jump at with glee, but this is a new arrangement as yet unknown in the UK Low Cost market and It will take time to perfect.

Good Luck to both Airlines
flower is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2004, 23:00
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suppose it would be out of the question for bmi baby to use the 6G ATR to continue the early morning service from Manchester to Cork? Come the start of the summer schedule there will be a substantial decrease from 5 to just 2 daily services from MAN to ORK, one bmi baby and one BA. Lunchtime for the BA and late afternoon for the bmi baby. High season should see more demand than supply - an opportunity there?
Tom the Tenor is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2004, 02:42
  #29 (permalink)  

Brunel to Concorde
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Virtute et Industria, et Sumorsaete Ealle
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The longer PRG, AGP,ALC CDG, BGY, PMI routes are going well and the load factors are good."

alterego,

I am pleased to here this which makes the CDG route decision, reduced from two rotations per day to one per day, hard to follow.
I suppose it is part of the fallout of losing one of the baby 737s from CWL.

It now prevents a quick day's business in Paris without the need to stay overnight. Or perhaps baby realises that not many pax take this option.
MerchantVenturer is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2004, 05:02
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: England
Posts: 15,063
Received 227 Likes on 88 Posts
Hmmm, to work a 737 with two crews per day on an 8 sector day requires you to be able to have a mix of domestic and med routes. Such as a CWL - Edi - CWL - pmi - CWL in the morning and hten a CWL - Bfs - CWL - Alc - CWL in the evening.

These sorts of parings allow you to offer double daily domestics in the morning and evening (which is what people want) plus every day european shorthaul services (which is what people want).

Its all about making the assets work as hard as possible for as little cost as possible with minimum complexity.

Running 2 737's at a base in conjunction with a code share with an unheard of turboprop operator is anything but.

Cheers

WWW
Wee Weasley Welshman is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2004, 05:23
  #31 (permalink)  

Wascally Welsh Wabbit
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: a bar somewhere
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wee weasley [email protected] sure you're from Wales?


prat

..getting personal rabbit..focus on the problem not the person.

Last edited by Hawk; 8th Mar 2004 at 12:45.
skyrabbit is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2004, 06:05
  #32 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would have thought an alliance with Aer Arann would have been a good move for Air Wales, especially if group aircraft and handling deals could be done, given aircraft commonality and market segment.
MarkD is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2004, 08:52
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Middle East
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm with WWW on this. Can't see it being a winner.

BMI Baby's a lo-co. One aircraft type, popular routes, pack em in, sell 'em cheap, ya-da ya-da..

Air Wales however is a brave stab at a Welsh National 'flag carrier' that links CWL with the rest of the the UK. Even though they charge for drinkies they're hardly a lo-co and the whole ethos is different to that of Baby. They use props, fly some low yield routes and are working hard to establish their 'Welshness' and their USP.

Painting one ATR into Baby's colours and co-branding rips up the marketing rule book. Pick a brand and build it. Do it well. Don't mess with it!
reverserunlocked is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2004, 15:50
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Barry, S.Wales
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good Business for AWW

Although only few of you seem to support the move from WW & AWW i think that both parties gain from it - - - - - AWW get some business and WW dont get snubbed for dropping routes. Both winners.
rsutt1 is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2004, 16:55
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good thing some of those who post here were not around 100 years ago when the Wright Brothers attempted powered flight, you can just imagine the comments:
never been done before so it will not work etc.

As for your comments WWW regarding
an unheard of turboprop operator
I didn't think you could sink much lower.
I well remember a 737 diverting into Birmingham with a phone number emblazoned down the side and everyone asking who on earth were they, it was a small fledgling airline very few had heard of and I can well remember then the talk was of how it would never catch on and I bet they will go bust before you know it. Well we all know the story of Easy Jet and no one had much faith in it when it started out.

The negative comments that pervade this forum whenever anything happens at Cardiff astonish me, what is it about the airport that attracts such vitriol. Cardiff is a vibrant happening city and yes the people have money to spend, the trend is changing.

This alliance is ideal for Cardiff it makes sense, give it a chance.
flower is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2004, 18:13
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: England
Posts: 15,063
Received 227 Likes on 88 Posts
No slur on Air Wales intended. But they are an unheard of turboprop airline. Nothing wrong with that. My point was Joe Punter is expecting a Jet like in the adverts and will feel cheated as he straps into an ATR.

Good luck to Air Wales I say. And BMIBaby. And Cardiff airport.

I don't see anyone attacking Cardiff airport. Observing that many airlines have failed to make a go of it there is merely a fact.

Cheers

WWW
Wee Weasley Welshman is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2004, 19:17
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many airlines have failed out of many airports, Cardiff is no different.
Air Wales most certainly needs to market itself, it needs to get out there and show the UK and beyond it exists. It is no good believing that simply because the routes are there they will succeed.
It is a great little airline which started three years ago with 1 D228, it now has 4 ATR42s with a 5th shortly arriving. With the right marketing and a good route structure there is absolutely no reason why it shouldn't be a first class domestic and short haul carrier in the UK.
The knockers and doubters I know will continue to dig away at Wales and anything to do with Cardiff Airport but this is a very different airport from even 2 years ago.
Regional airports need to be supported, the rapid growth at Bristol airport shows how it can be done. With the proposed motorway link road to Cardiff Airport a similar growth may be achieved out of CWL.
flower is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2004, 19:33
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the old days! There were a few people who had no idea how to run an airline. That....... 'old' Air Wales was an almost immediate distater when it started. One or two others tried and failed. Then someone else came along with a bit of nous. Shame that - it spoiled a good record - but hey, look at it now. Not doing too badly and a little bit of string pulling here and there, a nudge a wink and a getting together is good for everyone. Providing everyone knows what they doing.

It is a pity then that there should be posters here who should know better than to put down an operation that is trying to make 'it' work. It serves no useful purpose. Neither does a moderator getting involved. Them that are should, I think, define for themselves another name so that they do not draw forth vitriol and abuse.

So, to the owners and staff of Air Wales. Give it a good go and don't fall in the traps of the past when the originals went down. Be aware of the history and don't make the same mistakes. You got rid of a bad apple recently and that should have made a vast improvement!

And the detractors! Back off! There is nothing wrong with Turbo-Props when they suit the purpose - you don't believe that bmi baby would have joined forces if they thougt people didn't really like t/p's do you?

Good luck anyway.
CaptainFillosan is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2004, 20:24
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: England
Posts: 15,063
Received 227 Likes on 88 Posts
Whose putting down Air Wales?

My point was that BMI Babys customers might well be displeased to discover an ATR waiting for them when they expected a jet.

Customers have funny ideas about aircraft as I am sure we are all aware.

Cheers

WWW
Wee Weasley Welshman is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2004, 23:01
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have to say I think you are.

But to take up your point..............are bmi baby stupid enough not to let their pax know that? I doubt it and I rather doubt that the pax will mind either. I mean they don't go over the pond do they?

In all my years in the business I have found that almost all working together's are brilliant IF the people controlling it KNOW what they are doing.
CaptainFillosan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:53.


Copyright © MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.