Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Will airports be ready for the A380 ?

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Will airports be ready for the A380 ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Dec 2003, 08:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will airports be ready for the A380 ?

When 2006 comes round, and the new A380 enters service, many airports won't be ready for it - especially diversion fields. It's all well and good saying, LHR, HKG, LAX etc will be ready but what about the alternates to these airports. Take LHR as an example, and Virgin. One would assume that LGW would be it's first alternate in the event of a weather diversion. But if LGW is also closed, what airports could actually handle this a/c ??
Tenminutes is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2003, 14:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe Manchester will be the alternative not Gatwick

Golf India Bravo
GOLF-INDIA BRAVO is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2003, 21:11
  #3 (permalink)  
Neo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Currently I believe that EMA is the only other airport bar LHR to be able to take the A380 at present.

However, I know that LGW is making infrastructure changes to cope, and I'm sure other airports are doing the same.
 
Old 6th Dec 2003, 21:43
  #4 (permalink)  
LBAir
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Given the largest runway in the North of England and superb terminal facilities, great catchment area and the backing of World airlines....... What about that cow shed at Doncaster?
 
Old 8th Dec 2003, 07:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Not quite sure anymore
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

PIK can take the A380 whether for crew training,freight, pax or div we are sorted, just call eddie!
pikman is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2003, 02:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Horsham, England, UK. ---o--O--o---
Posts: 1,185
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Unhappy

However, I know that LGW is making infrastructure changes to cope, and I'm sure other airports are doing the same.
Hmmm! - The last I heard; BAA - GAL had a design for a moving passenger walkway on a bridge that crossed one of the main taxiways that pass the North Terminal. It spans the taxiway to join up with a new Satellite Terminal in the middle of the West Park. Unfortunately it was designed as having to allow a B-747 to taxi underneath it; but, very shortsightedly not to allow an A-380 to pass under it!

Duh!

Out Of Trim is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2003, 01:59
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: midlands
Age: 46
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Neo

how come EMA is the only other airfield bar LHR to accomadate
when other airports are 2 to 3 times the size of little old EMA such
as MAN. STN LGW ect..
just interested
thanks
cargohappy is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2003, 06:04
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Near to Prestwick,Scotland
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would have though Prestwick as well...........
IanH is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2003, 06:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,346
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
I read recently, somewhere, that LAX has not started any work at all (yet) to accommodate the A380...
reynoldsno1 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2003, 02:39
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: N/A
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think they want to... it would cost them millions of dollars. VS are not too happy about this (understandably!) and RB has written to California's new governor to force them to do something about it!
Wannabe Flyboy is online now  
Old 11th Dec 2003, 02:46
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 6 miles 14
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah but it's too big, just like Concorde was too noisy! Or would that be "it's not American so we don't want it here!" Maybe if it cant be handled RB will have to fly those nice shiney 747s there instead.Then again he could use an A340-600 or is that too long?
HOODED is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.