Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > African Aviation
Reload this Page >

British Airways Incident at Johannesburg

Wikiposts
Search
African Aviation Regional issues that affect the numerous pilots who work in this area of the world.

British Airways Incident at Johannesburg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 10:16
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: hector's house
Posts: 173
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The workload on the Flightdeck is inversely proportional to the speed of the aircraft!
hec7or is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 10:18
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: LHR
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"How fast were they going down the wrong taxiway at night to chop through it like butter?"

Probably no more than normal taxiing speed. It looks like a brick building. You can take those apart with nothing more than a 2" brick bolster and club hammer. Once you've breached a mortar course, bricks come down very easily.

A 747 is strong and would take some stopping...
BikerMark is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 10:20
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In transit
Age: 70
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The first 388 service is BA057/25JAN.

It will then operate BA055 on WED FRI SUN from 12FEB - 07MAR.
From 09MAR daily except TUE.

Subject of course to change.
Capetonian is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 10:23
  #64 (permalink)  
Death Cruiser Flight Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vaucluse, France.
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I saw the impressive on-site repair that Boeing did on the Condor 767 which was flown through the mast array on top of the mountain at Margarita Island. After a test flight, the aircraft went back into service. That was eighteen or so years ago, but I presume the capability still exists.
Georgeablelovehowindia is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 10:28
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,810
Received 136 Likes on 64 Posts
Eyewitness report, FWIW ...
I'll say it again we were travelling far too fast when we hit the building, not taxiing speed, if not for my seatbelt I would have been thrown out of my seat. I would have said we had started the procedure for taking off.
FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Incident at JNB [BA 744 G-BNLL collides with building]
MPN11 is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 10:33
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is the best news I've heard and I hope this sorry saga accelerates the deployment of BA's next A-380 on this lucrative, yet poorly serviced, route.
I suspect that an A380 wing will also take a chunk out of the building if it is taxied down M
EastMids is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 10:35
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: LHS
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, that is ridiculous. If there are too many tasks while taxying you stop them or set the parking brake. All of the crew pays attention to the here and now. Taxying in an unknown area with minimal lighting (if it was well known to the crew or well lit.....) all heads are up. No exceptions.

I'm sorry are you a private pilot?

Airlines usually provide the performance numbers through ACARS or they are computed on laptops/tablets prior to pushback. The only task would be getting a route clearance (if not obtained prior to push) and the checklists.

I'm sorry but Nigel really did bad for the rest of perfection on this one. Pull the FOs head out of .. and have him look out the window.


Distraction from the primary task of taxying safely.

These days airline crews are given far, far too many tasks to do while taxying out to the runway.

It's become a macho thing: "Yes we can handle any task you give us while navigating to the end of the runway".

But be honest. Who hasn't looked up while taxying - and got a bit of a shock? Yes?
Bus Junkie is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 11:16
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Luberon
Age: 72
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Someone claiming to have been on the flight has just posted this on the Daily Mail article comments....

This is a total fabrication of the truth. My wife and I were both sat in first and we're actually among the last off of the plane! Due to the damage the plane had sustained and the narrow taxiing area, the plane was disembarked via seat rows from the rear left exit. As such, passengers in economy left the plane first, followed by business and premium economy and finally first class. Nobody received preferential treated in the emergency situation!! I suspect that's Mrs Oxfam hoped to jump the queue for hotel room by complaining on twitter, whilst everyone else waited in line for their turn.
Judge for yourself the veracity
sitigeltfel is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 11:20
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it had been KAL or similar the place would be full of people blaming "cultural problems..."
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 11:26
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Middle East
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
exactly,

nigel's are again showing their superior airmanship!
boeingdriverx is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 11:28
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dubai
Age: 43
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would you believe there are cultural problems at BA? Is there a Hierarchal culture which prevents crew members from expressing concern?
kungfu panda is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 11:29
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: UK
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gosh, flyertalk is even more uninformed and speculative than here. Didn't think that was possible. Whilst I'm sure it will fall on deaf ears is there any chance we could keep the speculation and uninformed comments to a minimum? I'm sure the guys were doing their best last night and I'm sure lessons will be learned.
Propellerhead is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 11:29
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Steyning, West Sussex, UK
Age: 73
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could ATC have warned them?
dclews is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 11:30
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Another airport hotel
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
British Airways Incident at Johannesburg

Bus Junkie - I understood BA have role reversal across all fleets. One of the FO's may have been taxiing the aircraft. Where was the third crew member at time of impact?
spider_man is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 11:35
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If there are too many tasks while taxying you stop them or set the parking brake. All of the crew pays attention to the here and now. Taxying in an unknown area with minimal lighting (if it was well known to the crew or well lit.....) all heads are up. No exceptions.

I'm sorry are you a private pilot?
See? There's denial about this issue.

And no, I'm not a private pilot. I logged many thousands of hours on this type of aircraft without hitting anything. But I am now old and wise enough to admit that unnecessary distractions lead to more close calls than there should have been.
Albert Driver is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 11:47
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dubai
Age: 43
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
boeingdriverx- I think most British Pilots would like to be a Nigel at one time or another- I never made it past the HR department. I think though the airmanship at BA probably reflects that of all British Pilots. The safety record of British pilots has been pretty good since the 80's.
kungfu panda is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 12:06
  #77 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@dclews
Could ATC have warned them?
Nope, the distance from the tower at night to this point is too great, and the B747 only deviated from the taxiway by a few metres before it hit the support equipment building, probably in the order of 5 to 10 secs from deviation from the taxiway to impact.
Romeo E.T. is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 12:16
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In da north country
Age: 62
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Last I checked, 744 have windows which enables one to see outside.

When in doubt, just keep taxiing................
Willit Run is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 12:40
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mars
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The surprise to me is not the ground Nav error but the width of the taxi-way they went into. It only looks about 20m wide. As for the Asiana apologists, a bit different, clipping a building in the dark to missing an airport completely on a clear day!
Schnowzer is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 12:50
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: england
Posts: 860
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Best training in the world? You must be joking! (And I work for BA!)
hunterboy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.