Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > African Aviation
Reload this Page >

Lanseria Atc Shocker

Wikiposts
Search
African Aviation Regional issues that affect the numerous pilots who work in this area of the world.

Lanseria Atc Shocker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Dec 2009, 07:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: JOHANNESBERG
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lanseria Atc Shocker

This post actualy found on another forum but worth discussion here as well.

On thursday was at lanseria on the taxi with my 172 and saw fire truck/emergency sevices racing to 06L. On the radio we were told to stop taxying and standby due to a inbound emergency?

There was a Comair 737 at the holding point 06L. Next thing we hear is the ATC telling Comair to line up 06L AND THEN GIVEN TAKE OFF clearence.As we looked up we could see the inbound Beech nineteen hundred with one motor feathered(the emergency traffic)at about 1 mile.

The nineteen hundred then had to do a single engine go around due to Comair still clearly on the runway-hadnt even started the take off roll/?

Luckely nineteen hundred turned out left on one motor and was able to land a while later safely.

We are tired of Comair getting priority at Lanseria-shocking controlling,and doesnt emergency traffic get priority.
Could have been a very different outcome if emergency traffic coudnt maintain for some reason.
CALCULATOR is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 09:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: ATL, GA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LOL,

I can't believe it! In the US you would lose you ticket over that. Tell me does this kind of thing happen all of the time? I've flown into FALA a few times and the guys in the tower are way lax. When I flew in New York (JFK, LGA, and EWR) we had e[FONT='Calibri','sans-serif']mergency[/FONT] all of the time. Everytime they received priority. Even in the busiest airspace in the world. What is wrong with those people!?
Wandering.Aviator is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 09:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In Transit
Age: 76
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil Fala Atc

Had I been the pilot of the Beech 1900 I would have gone up to the tower and smacked the controller one in the mouth.
Habari is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 09:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The frequency jungle
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the Comair? What was he thinking? Certainly he looked out the window, saw the B1900 and still elected to go? Very bad controlling, poor airmanship by the comair crew on top of that.
126,7 is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 09:46
  #5 (permalink)  
Sir Osis of the river
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Not good

When I operated out of FALA many moons ago, the ATC were professional, friendly and helpful. (Of course in those days there was no Comair ops from there.) I once had an engine failure in a Twin Otter out of there and they bent over backwards to get me back in first.

Not being in possesion of all the facts, I would not like to speculate exactly what happened.

However if the event took place exactly as described, something has gone seriously wrong in the new RSA ATC system and somebody deserves a good klap around the ears.

Glad to hear there were no major consequenses and the B1900 crew got down safely.

Sir O
 
Old 5th Dec 2009, 12:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: FL370
Age: 61
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Going nowhere slowly...

Not a very bright thing to do.. Especially since Comair are probably the slowest at just about everything they do.. Taxi,take-off, cruise, descent. Painfully slooooow in fact...
jojojett is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 13:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: South Africa
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a very bright thing to do.. Especially since Comair are probably the slowest at just about everything they do.. Taxi,take-off, cruise, descent. Painfully slooooow in fact...
Nope, they are definitely faster than Turkish and SAA's 319's.
nugpot is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 14:20
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Western Cape
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But slower than SAA B738's.
Gyro Nut is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 21:26
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
uhem F/O gyro....I have notched up a fair amount of B738's on JNB-CPT sector.

Back to the topic...

FALA has gnd and Twr freq, the Comair would have been on Gnd up to the holding point and may not even have been aware of the inbound emergency and its distance out from the field, on transfer to Twr at the hold probably got take-off clearance as ATC could have tried to expidiate the scheduled traffic departure before the emergency traffic "blocks" the runway, and then the timing and situational awareness snowballed to the point where the B1900 found it necessary to do a SE go-around.

CALCULATOR
We are tired of Comair getting priority at Lanseria-shocking controlling
....scheduled traffic always get priority over non-scheduled and GA aviation....except med emergency flights/emergency traffic etc/VIP etc.....if as you say you found this on another forum namely AvCom - Your Aviation Community then please include a lot of the other posts made there...you make it look like Comair are the villains here.

the full story including the ATC side of the story hasn't even been mentioned yet.
Romeo E.T. is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 21:38
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Itinerant
Posts: 828
Received 79 Likes on 14 Posts
IF the facts as presented by the OP are correct, an official investigation should indeed be conducted. There is no case in which a controller should put an aircraft onto a live runway with an emergency inbound for the same runway at that distance.
Especially a twin with one engine out.
grizzled is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 05:53
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hell's Kitchen
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A pearl a Day!

Where in the law does it state that, schedule traffic get priority over non-schedule???!!!
NOTOT is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 06:56
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The frequency jungle
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know that landing traffic always has priority over departing traffic.
126,7 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 14:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IFR traffic on a flight plan gets priority over VFR GA traffic not on a flight plan, which is the kind of flying I assume the original poster does in his 172 - no wonder Comair gets priority over him.

Regarding the incident, the Comair crew probably were not aware of the proximity of the emergency traffic and had they seen the aircraft on final approach it is difficult to judge whether traffic is on approach to the left or right runway until they are very close. There would have been no reason for them not to follow ATC instructions.

The culprit here is the controller who clearly jeopardised the safety of both the 1900 and the Comair aircraft given take-off clearance. Hopefully the appropriate reports have been filed and action will be taken. This is certainly not the first case of poor controlling at Lanseria.
JCO7 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 16:44
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Globe Trotter
Age: 60
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where in the law does it state that, schedule traffic get priority over non-schedule???!!!
As an ex-ATC, this used to be in our procedures manual. Not sure if it still is. The priority has always been:
1)Emergency and VIP (State President)
2)Schedule traffic
3)Non-schedule traffic
4)Training flights
Heritage 1 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 17:53
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heritage 1...thats the way I had it when doing my Genaral R/T licence in 1985

thanks
Romeo E.T. is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2009, 08:43
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hell's Kitchen
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATC Procedures Manual!!!!!!!

Was this the law in 1985? Sure wasn't when i did my rt lic. in 1984!!!!

The pearls keep cumming!!!!
NOTOT is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2009, 09:38
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Africa
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hope u guys are also complaining to the powers that b and not just this forum. The email addresses at ATNS are easy, the first name with the 1st letter of the surname @atns.co.za all lowercase. E.g. "[email protected]" or the COO etc.

With just what's on here to go on it doesn't sound good, but there are are always 3 sides to a story.

As paying customers, u have the right to ask for the best service and explanations if there is not - and I'm an ATC.

Just be polite tho, nothing pisses everyone off more than some ranting know-it-all.

Good luck. Keep giving feedback to the powers, they have no idea, good or bad.
EltorroLoco is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2009, 14:26
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South Africa
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was recently doing some flying into Lanseria and was astounded to hear how irate and impatient on of the monkeys in the concrete tree was getting with what everyone could hear was a foreign student pilot. I could hear his confidents draining away as this palooka ranted on at him and could only listen in amazement as this controller took a potentially safe pilot and created a potentially dangerous scenario. Poor show.

We can only be thankful that the 1900 pilots weren’t Airlink graduates or who knows what could have happened. Well done to them for handling what was thrown at them, including Lanseria ATC.

Last edited by oompilot; 7th Dec 2009 at 16:39.
oompilot is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2009, 21:12
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: somewhere sunny
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not the best show

Has any one taken into account the current staffing numbers at FALA, i flew out of there during winter and noted that the ground frequency was only open for a few hours of the day and the rest of the time combined on tower 124.00. Its no excuse for poor controlling but with no leave given to the guys working there tails off during the year, its causes a good atc to make stupid decisions because exhaustion finally catches up.

We only complain about the times we get shafted around but rarely do we even give the atcs a thank you for a shorter routing or the left for landing without asking.

I wonder how it is gona be during the world cup cause from i heard on the news the other day the atcs are going work longer hours, less off days and foreign controllers who will earn R70 000 a month with expenses paid while the locals get half of that and for what? More stress, less sleep and a kick up the from the company that wont pay them enough to stay in this beautiful country!!!

Sometimes in an incident like this we have to look out of the box and actually look at the causes....it might not be as straight forward as we think.
underneath the radar is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.