Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > African Aviation
Reload this Page >

Smoking Spoories

Wikiposts
Search
African Aviation Regional issues that affect the numerous pilots who work in this area of the world.

Smoking Spoories

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jan 2009, 17:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Down the airway.
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smoking Spoories

Rumour says that fifteen SAA cabin crew were arrested at LHR this monring after 50kgs (worth £150,000) of cannabis was found on board the SAA flight from JHB to LHR. It is rimoured that the drugs were found in crew baggage.
This may be found on BBC website-just so you know I don't make it up.
Der absolute Hammer is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2009, 17:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bishops Stortford
Age: 64
Posts: 143
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SAA Cabin crew held - drugs smuggling

BBC news says:


Fifteen cabin crew staff have been arrested after 50kg (110lbs) of cannabis was found on a flight from Johannesburg to Heathrow Airport.
The haul, worth about £150,000, was seized from a South African Airways plane, customs officials said. Officers from the UK Border Agency found the drugs in baggage at the London airport.
caiman27 is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2009, 17:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: mauritius
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
15"cabin"crew.? That must include the cockpit crew aswell ? ( 3 cockpit and 12 cabin crew ) UH???What a joke !! I dont think so,did"nt they got rid of that chap years ago !! "Why drink and drive when you can smoke and fly" ?
skychick2 is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2009, 18:57
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Down the airway.
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The BBBC says now that 15 flight and cabin crew have been arrested after cannabius was found in three bags.
Those being held in custody are being interviewed.
Here is the number to call for drugs smuggling tip offs.....24-hour customs hotline on 0800 59 5000.
Is it not wonderful to see SAA flight and cabin crew working together. Perhaps this is the closest they may get to the profit sharing?
Der absolute Hammer is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 00:21
  #5 (permalink)  
prospector
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sharing what?? three bags containing cannabis among 15 crew?? There was also cocaine mentioned in this news article.

" Fifteen crew members of a South African Airways flight that landed in London were arrested on Tuesday after a large shipment of cannabis and cocaine was found in their luggage, customs officials said.

Bob Gaiger of HM Revenue and Customs said the flight attendants and pilots on a flight from Johannesburg to London were taken into custody at Heathrow Airport as they passed through customs.

He said customs officials found 50 kilograms of cannabis in three of their bags.

One of the bags also contained about four kilograms of cocaine, worth about £150,000 ($323,000).

Gaiger said it was not immediately clear who the bags belonged to.

South African Airways was not immediately available to comment on the arrests.

AP
 
Old 21st Jan 2009, 02:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Travelling East
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not able to identify whose bags they were??? What rubbish, each bag has a bronze plate rivetted to it with the owners name and employee number on it.

And how did it get to the aeroplane with that stuff in them? Did security at Ops not see it???

Why can some people not just do their jobs, as they are employed to do, without trying to take advantage?
skyvan is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 03:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RSA
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a pity! This is sure to have a negative effect on SAA's public
opinion. Whoever is guilty, must be brought to book.
Would of thought the last incident a few years ago,
would of taught the odd sneaky crew member a lesson
putt for dough is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 03:49
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Lusaka and Joburg
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Skyvan

I think we will find it is not that simple.
This not a few kgs by a crewmember for some pocket money. 50 kgs in three bags?? Thats a large mass that would easily show up on the scanners at ORT and Heathrow. The drug dogs at Heathrow would pick it up a mile off.

This required a high level of organisation at both ends. The bags would be either anonomosly labelled or labelled with some elses name.
Lots more to come - but will we hear??
Flying Bean is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 04:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South africa
Age: 31
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ Skyvan
SAA recently issued crew with new baggage and did not have tags to issue at the time so a number of crew members currently don't have tags.
highflyer17 is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 04:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Africa
Age: 54
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pass the Butt Lube

Great, just what we needed....more cavity searches and 'anal' security proceedures...thanks guys.

I hope the captain is allowed to dispense some of his own justice first.....

If it was an SA jail.....butt lube WOULD be the order of the day.....
Golf_Seirra is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 06:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Asia
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bags & Tags

Al bags, cargo and mail MUST be tagged.

Now they know why they are one of the few airlines profiled in Asia.
Beta Light is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 08:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Your nearest Marriott
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So how does it work? Is there a security check at OPS? And then in the terminal? Or just ops, and then onto a bus to the aircraft?
I.R.PIRATE is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 08:39
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Customs can fingerprint the crew and soon find out who owns what. With everyone denying ownership it may have been easier to arrest the whole crew and sort it out later, may have only been one or two of them involved.

I think we can assume customs have dealt with this sort of situation before.
Metro man is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 09:18
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Front right seat
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crew and bags screened at ops before bus to aircraft.

Very embarrasing indeed.
divinehover is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 09:34
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Age: 48
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just heard on eNews that crew has been released - apparently no charges filed..
ambasador is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 10:04
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South Africa
Age: 51
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well done and thanks for dragging the rest of us down with you as "honest" South Africans. So much for Proudly South African.
rudder hard over is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 12:17
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Travelling East
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that the fact that the crew have been released without charges says a huge amount.

Their bags were probably tampered with post check-in at Ops, either on the way to the plane, or on the plane before departure itself.

I just feel sorry for all the longhaul crews, in future when they go through LHR there will almost certainly be visits to the Customs shed until the stain of this event dies down.

Sorry for doubting you guys, good luck for the future.
skyvan is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 14:41
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Africa
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tampering of bags

Skyvan and others suggest that bags were tempered with on the way to the aircraft.
What a totally absurd suggestion. What would the purpose be?? To frame them??
Certainly not to smuggle drugs because how were the smugglers think they were going to reach their intended target by placing it someone elses baggage. Besides 50kg of hash and coke apparently required the use of 3 extra bags. All crew bags are collected by the crew at the aircraft, by the crew - then are bussed to customs. None of the crew or their baggage goes through the terminal buildings. This was a deliberate act of smuggling by the crew, who have complicted the task of British Custome by denying ownership of the bags concerned
Bushbuck is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 15:47
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SA
Age: 49
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hummer, from two post before we new what was going on to quiet? You must be so disappointed that no one was charged!
flux is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2009, 16:33
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flew to CT with SAA a couple of years ago and they were so appalling that I vowed never again...However in the recent past I thought I might give them another chance for my next trip but after this, no way....
Back to BA..........
paully is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.