Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > African Aviation
Reload this Page >

Staffing Levels at different South African Airlines

Wikiposts
Search
African Aviation Regional issues that affect the numerous pilots who work in this area of the world.

Staffing Levels at different South African Airlines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Oct 2008, 09:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Third Rock
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Staffing Levels at different South African Airlines

I read with some interest a thread under Rumours and News about staffing levels at some large international carriers. Figures mentioned were British Airways 160 staff members per airframe, Iberia 130 members per airframe and American 90 members per airframe. Does anybody know if these figures include technical (groundcrew) and pilots, or just admin levels. EvanB, maybe you could enlighten us as to those levels at SAA, and anyone else at other SA airlines. I would be extremely interested to see how we fare globally!!
DB2
Doodlebug2 is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2008, 14:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is the real make or break factor for airlines although it is difficult to access since one can outsource lots of activities like maintenance and ground handling. SAA had about 9000 employees (got rid of 1800 in the restructuring). 53 aircraft? (9x A346, 6x A343, 6x A343, 17x B738, 11x A319, 3x 737F, 1x B744) ... 170 per airframe, not great, although they do have a big tech division that does work for other airlines!

A more accurate measure though is staff per passenger per kilometer traveled! This implicitly weights it for long haul versus short haul travel.
evanb is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2008, 15:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Too far from the equator
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How can you measure against airframes ?
Number of seats is the criteria.
kotakota is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2008, 17:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its not just about seats either, but also about how many time they are used and for how long! Thats why a weighted measure like staff per passenger per kilometer traveled which implicitly weights for long haul versus short haul travel, for larger versus smaller aircraft. However, this measure is more difficult to calculate and sometimes requires proprietary data.
evanb is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2008, 10:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Dubai
Age: 56
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The golden rule for airlines. NEVER have more staff than seats on your aircraft. Each seat must only have 1 mouth to feed.
Avi8tor is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2008, 23:03
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A more accurate measure though is staff per passenger per kilometer traveled! This implicitly weights it for long haul versus short haul travel.
evanb is partly right. I saw this stats somewhere a while back and if memory serves me correct, SAA was roughly about 130 staff per airframe. However, this is not a measure of how well an airline is doing. If your fleet is burning fuel on routes with empty seats, your staff per airframe ratio doesnt change. Staff per passenger per kilometer traveled doesn't always necessarily weight it for long haul versus short haul though, unless you are only taking into consideration staff that is directly involved with flights ie cabin crew, handlers, maintenance etc. This whole thing gets complicated but your best bet is to take a look at the financial reports which are usually available on the airline's websites. You'll get a better understanding.
mwafrika is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.