Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > African Aviation
Reload this Page >

Training bonds and claiming it back from the tax man

Wikiposts
Search
African Aviation Regional issues that affect the numerous pilots who work in this area of the world.

Training bonds and claiming it back from the tax man

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Apr 2008, 23:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Training bonds and claiming it back from the tax man

Hallo PPrune,

I was wondering how it works if you got a training bond for example 2 years and after a year you leave the company. Then you pay back your half of lets say R50 000.

Can you then claim back the R50 000 from the tax man due to the fact that its a working expense ?

The other question I would like to find out from you guys. If you pay for a conversion to a aircraft you need to fly for a company out of your own pocket, can you claim it back. I payed for a conversion to work for a company. ( I payed the company) and would like to know if its worth it to ask the company for proof so I can claim it back.

Any advice will be nice from the experts on pprune...

Thank you !

Last edited by Happydays; 7th Apr 2008 at 12:05.
Happydays is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2008, 11:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cape Town (where else?)
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While I'm no tax expert, I think you'll find SARS will deem these expenses to be of a capital nature and thus you cannot claim them as a deduction.
Deanw is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2008, 12:50
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know what the tax rules are in the RSA, but in the Uk you cannot claim for expenses that put you in a position to do a job. The training bond is not an expense, it is a forfeiture that you agreed to for breach of contract, it is not a working expense.

If you pay for a conversion to another type in order to place you in a position to work for an employer that would not be allowed either. If the company had already employed you and then required you to change types at your own expense that might be allowed, but it would be very unusual. If a company sold you a type rating and then employed you on the basis of having that rating, you could not claim this as an expense for the reason that the rating simply put you in a position to be employed.

As I say, I do not know what the rules are in the RSA, but I would be very surprised if they were so generous.
Bealzebub is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2008, 14:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: #37 for Start
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snoop

SARS will deem these expenses to be of a capital nature and thus you cannot claim them as a deduction.
There is your final answer...

Q4NVS is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2008, 16:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dubai
Age: 55
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi guys,

Actually you can claim a training bond back from SARS. I have and there is a precedent for it. See tax board decision 197(I think of 2001).

I successully claimed back the settlement of my airlink training bond, along with all my legal fees.

I think it works on the fact that you are probably moving onto a better job that allows you to earn more. Furthermore, the loss of revenue to the state is neutral. The company would have claimed against their tax for the training. By claiming back, the state will lose the amount that you claim, however, the amount you pay back should be taxable in the airline's hands which should make up for what the state refunds you.

I doubt any money that you pay for training yourself would be tax deductible. I think the liability has to stem from an obligation where you can work it off.....ie it must say conversion training bond.

My tax return underwent an audit and they asked me for several bits of supporting documents, but nothing to do with the training bond.

Hope it helps.

Kenny
Kennytheking is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2008, 09:17
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Expenses of a capital nature

While an expense of a capital nature cannot be deducted against income, can it not be offset against CGT of a house sale /share sale in the same tax year, if you happen to have? (Also no tax expert but just wondering...)
james ozzie is online now  
Old 8th Apr 2008, 10:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dubai
Age: 55
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
james,

Interesting concept......I am no expert either, but I think you may have a valid point.

It would not even have to be in the same year, as a capital loss can be carried forward to future years. Just speculation on my part though!
Kennytheking is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2008, 12:08
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Front right seat
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get hold of Pieter Van der Zwaard, an accountant in Pta. He got my tax for a training bond back a few years ago. 012 662 0714
divinehover is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2008, 18:17
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for all the info guys !
Happydays is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.