Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > African Aviation
Reload this Page >

Comair flying high

Wikiposts
Search
African Aviation Regional issues that affect the numerous pilots who work in this area of the world.

Comair flying high

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Aug 2007, 15:20
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Africa
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my books, a 744 is a new aircraft. Unless you've got 747-800's and not telling anyone about it
JetNut is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2007, 05:26
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: terra softa
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have to agree with your last few posts, JetNut - I think DJ is in denial.

Thing is, I have some reliable information
Don't you believe it - this is the same man that said, on the 27th October 2005, on another famous thread:

There is absolutely no future in SAA launching it's own LCC arm...
Brings to mind that old comparision to a mushroom - kept in the dark and fed, well, not exactly prime rib - if you know what I mean.
journeyman is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2007, 06:32
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahh, I see we are going down this well worn path again, seems whenever someone doesn’t want to put forward a coherent argument they get personal.... as I said the last time- AT THE TIME (very important piece that) that was the official position. Things change and Im glad they did!!
Deskjocky is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2007, 08:09
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: terra softa
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not getting personal - just telling it like it is. If it was the official position at the time, are you trying to tell us that they formulated the Mango business plan, procured the aircraft, hired the staff, etc, etc - all in under 12 months? SAA couldn't move that fast if they were being chased by a liquidator!

Remember the 777 fiasco? Dilly-dallied for so long, even Boeing lost their patience. So just maybe it wasn't the official position - maybe they just didn't tell you.
journeyman is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2007, 10:31
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Africa
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SAA management has a fundamental cancer. This cancer is called bureaucracy

I'm sure DJ will at least agree on this ....

Too many cooks (kooks?) spoil the broth!

So Jouneyman, as you correctly stated..there is no way in hell, Mango was conceived and implemented within the space of 12 months...12 years maybe.
JetNut is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2007, 18:33
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South Africa
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey now.....to merge the original thread with most of what has been said after that......I think it is great that both Comair and Mango are doing well......good for all of us as fare paying pax and as aviation people......

Interesting how the world has changed......most the "traditional" airlines struggle to make money (a bunch of them in chapter 11) while the low costs are the ones making money.........go you good thing.
Balmy is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2007, 10:13
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Below the Deepest Darkest
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well at least the TAXPAYER gets something for their investment- cheap tickets!
Interesting point, utter crap but interesting.

Mango doesn't offer rates that are significantly cheaper that all the other low cost airlines in the country. The only difference is that the TAXPAYERS don't have to subsidise all the the others. If companies like Comair can do it why should we be happy about subsidising another one just to get the same ticket prices?
BeechGecko is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2007, 11:30
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: JNB
Age: 70
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK guy's there is not a single LCC in RSA, a LCC is an airline that sells all seats onboard at one price, not at 10 price scales.

BUT THINK ABOUT THIS!!!!!!!
I think that Mango is SAA's best and biggest scam that they have pulled past the competition board. They say Mango is an independant company!!
But how can that be if SAA owns 100% of Mango shares? It means that all executive board proposals have to be ok by the shareholder & that is SAA

Heard from the boys that SAA is not giving Mango any more aircraft, nor is SAA geting of any more routes so that Mango can operate on them.
moonshine707 is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2007, 13:48
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cape town south africa
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard other wise

I heard from the chaps at mango that they currently looking at new routes an adding new a/c,so who knows who is right or wrong.I dont see why saa wont give them more routes or a/c tho!
luther55 is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2007, 14:33
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: #37 for Start
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BUT THINK ABOUT THIS!!!!!!!
I think that Mango is SAA's best and biggest scam that they have pulled past the competition board. They say Mango is an independant company!!
Why do they even need to be an independant company to operate a LCC division - Kulula is not...

Ever considered how many different Motor Brand Dealerships is run by the McCarthy Group (i.e. Toyota, Honda, Mercedes Benz etc.)

Your point being...
Q4NVS is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2007, 09:21
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SAA management has a fundamental cancer. This cancer is called bureaucracy

I'm sure DJ will at least agree on this ....

Too many cooks (kooks?) spoil the broth!

So Jouneyman, as you correctly stated..there is no way in hell, Mango was conceived and implemented within the space of 12 months...12 years maybe.
Jetnut, SAA has problems top to bottom, sure bureaucracy is an issue- however checks and balances must be in place to ensure no one rips the ring out of it. There is however a major need to more decentralized decision making- bottlenecks are everywhere- problem here is that a person who was given a position through political affiliations is sht scared to make the critical calls so everything gets shunted up the line. Those who can make the calls are thus disempowered.

As far as Mango goes, Im chuffed a lot of people think it couldn’t be strung together in the time that it happened- means we are underestimated. At the start of it all there were a lot of people out there who said it would not come off for this reason or that and it all worked out just fine. Most of the people who worked on the Mango project went back into the SAA system when the project was finished.
Deskjocky is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2007, 11:23
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Africa
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
where to from here

problem here is that a person who was given a position through political affiliations is sht scared to make the critical calls
Its a cancer. No cure known to mankind. So DJ....where do you see the company in 5 years time then (or am I asking the wrong person), although a calculated guess will also be appreciated
JetNut is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2007, 09:31
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: JNB
Age: 70
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Luther consider the fact that SAA was suppose to give Mango a additional aircraft to roll their fleet operation while they have one a/c at a time in C Check till end of Oct. That didn't happen so now Mango is down to 3 a/c. SAA was to give Mango another 800 starting Nov07, SAA last week decided no go!!!

Mango was supposed to get 2 more new aircraft from Boeing next year March, because SAA did not want to part with any more of their own. Now SAA said no to Mango they cant get new a/c as SAA is not going to withdraw from any of their routes so Mango will remain at 4 a/c.
moonshine707 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2007, 18:26
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: JNB
Age: 70
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Deskjockey I can see ur an SAA loyaltie, but explain to us why your precious SAA did not stick to their original proposed bussiness plan for Mongo, by expanding Mango the way they said they would , their behind by 4 a/c thusfar, or is there a nother BS justification for this in your leadership explanation as well, plse dont sound like Schack!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
moonshine707 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2007, 18:31
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: JNB
Age: 70
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have to side with Jetnut on his view's, sound like a sober man with insight, must agree that DJ is defendig SAA to the last man standing. Sad but stupid
moonshine707 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2007, 18:38
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: JNB
Age: 70
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OH yes DJ just to provoke your utmost sincere oppinion, I heard that Mango had to adjust their brilliant low prices to break even, Im sure Mr Novic's visit to the Mango office would not reflect on Nico Bezuidenhout's arrogance. Afterall Mr Novick is a descend man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
moonshine707 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2007, 20:25
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: turning inbound
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
moonshine......are you chatting to yourself?
reptile is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.