Let410 V. Dhc-6
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In close proximity to a LET
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
V1... Ooops
Thank you for a very informative reply.
I trust that this now puts the argument about legitimate LETs and the other cowboys in the right perspective. LET's not hear the trotting out and dusting off of old worn-out cliché’s, untruths and downright lies, as espoused by the Otter drivers every time the LET is mentioned.
Soap Box Cowboy
Thanks for the topic................... see you in Hyde Park?
Cheers
Thank you for a very informative reply.
I trust that this now puts the argument about legitimate LETs and the other cowboys in the right perspective. LET's not hear the trotting out and dusting off of old worn-out cliché’s, untruths and downright lies, as espoused by the Otter drivers every time the LET is mentioned.
Soap Box Cowboy
Thanks for the topic................... see you in Hyde Park?
Cheers
I posted some additional information related to the history of Twin Otter accidents on this post, in response to a question that was raised there: http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...hreadid=186105
I understand that the LET is available with two different engines on it - the original fitment, and a PWC engine. Is there a significant difference in performance - in particular, single engine performance - between the two? Did the manufacturer publish different performance data (takeoff run, rate of climb, SE climb, etc.) for the PWC engine when it was offered later on?
Michael
Michael