Wikiposts
Search
African Aviation Regional issues that affect the numerous pilots who work in this area of the world.

SAAs Airbusses?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Oct 2004, 06:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK South Coast
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SAAs Airbusses?

What is happening about SAAs Airbus order? I heard that the A320 order was cancelled (saving $50million in short term costs) and that the airline was less than happy with the performance of the A340-600 (costing a packet in maintainance costs).
Mode7 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2004, 07:16
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: tanzania
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
saa airbus

well well well

im sure a lot of people will agree "boeing is better",seeing the A340-600 after take off R.O.C out of fajs is proof enough..

keep it up there fellows

no more 406pilot
406pilot is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2004, 16:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Colorado USA
Age: 68
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the only way the 340-600 got any ROC out of JS was due partly to the curvature of the Earth and partly due to slippery French salesmen!
V1
V1 Rotate is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2004, 17:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pluto
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danger

Now now guys don't pick on those funny looking aeroplanes just cos the are french.

cm
Captain Magic is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2004, 19:22
  #5 (permalink)  

I don't want to be the best pilot in the world - Just the oldest
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Here and there
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All I know is that as a regular 195cm SLF on A340-200 the seat pitch SUCKS!!! But according to the Sawabona (spelling?) letter from the CEO, they are addressing that issue.

Great airline though!!!
Islander Jock is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2004, 19:23
  #6 (permalink)  
Registered User *
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Not here anymore
Age: 63
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
partly to the curvature of the Earth and partly due to slippery French salesmen!
Mostly due to SAA's crap decision making I would say.

IJ, missed that one. Ditto for the seats that "SUCKS"...on the -600 as well. Crap decision making. Great WHAT??? BTW, how can you you use the words "SUCKS" and "great" in one post about one carrier? As far as I am concerned never change your mind...and you used "SUCKS" before "great".
BAKELA is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2004, 05:24
  #7 (permalink)  

I don't want to be the best pilot in the world - Just the oldest
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Here and there
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
G'day Bakela,
OK my post might have been a bit contradictory. Probably a result of too many Castle Largers during an afternoon brai.

As a regular o'seas traveller though, I find the cabin crew service to be some of the best I have experienced compared with say QF, BA, SQ, MH etc.
So despite the fact that the seat pitch sucks , I still think they are a great airline. If only they'd use the 747-400 on the Perth runs.
Islander Jock is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2004, 07:06
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Colorado USA
Age: 68
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the time/speed difference between the 747-400 and the 340-600 on the Perth run?
V1
V1 Rotate is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2004, 07:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The frequency jungle
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am due to fly on the A340-200 in December. I am not 195cm, so maybe I will be a bit more comfortable than Islander Jock.
The only thing that bothers me with the Bus is that they are so slow. It takes nearly an hour longer from Europe to SA than the B747 does. And the flights are already sooo long............
126,7 is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2004, 07:59
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: temporarily unsure :-)
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as far as i know ( i don't fly busses though),the 340s out of joburg mostly keep up with the 747s at around mach.83 or so out to europe at night.
RUDAS is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2004, 08:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The frequency jungle
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
( i don't fly busses though)
You dont fly jumbos either it seems.
M.83 for the bus is correct, but he is not keeping up with the jumbo which is cruising between M.85 and M.86. It takes Lufthansa 9h50 from JNB to FRA and it takes SAA in the bus nearly 11h15. Not keeping up at all.
126,7 is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2004, 15:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus and Boeing flight times

Found this interesting, went through my log book and took all the flights that I have done on the 747 classic and later the A340 and looked at the average times on sectors that I have done in both aircraft. Some useless info but maybe it will help.

JNB-FRA B747-300 average times 10.3
A340-600 10.4

JNB-PER B747 8.8
A340-200 9.2

PER-JNB B747 10.5
A340-200 10.8

JNB-ZRH B747 9.9
A340-200 10.6

ZRH-JNB B747 10.3
A340-200 10.5

JNB-HKG B747 13
A340-600 13.2

I wasn't fortunate enough to fly the B747-400, I loved the classic but prefer the Airbus
bytheby is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2004, 17:42
  #13 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,155
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Non-pilot speaking. On the LHR~JNB route, that I very familiar with, my private log shows that sector times for the VS 340-300s are about 30 mins more than for their 744s.

I have not done the route with other carriers for a while now, so cannot offer comparisons. VS always show that the ex-LHR arrives 30 mins after the 744 and they schedule the JNB departure 30 mins earlier for a Bus. That said, "30 mins" is a nice round figure for folks and it might be +/-.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2004, 20:59
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The frequency jungle
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bytheby
Funny how close those times are. Flying as SLF on the B747-400 JNB-FRA, we are in the air for 9.8hrs and flying in the A340-200/300 JNB-ZRH, it takes 10.6hrs. So logically it would take a little longer to get from JNB to FRA which is about 30 min north of ZRH. This is in the A340-200/300. (depending which airline you use) Of course SAA flies the -600 on this route.

Heard a Syrian B747SP the other day doing M.087 !!! Only the C750 overtakes him!!

Mode 7: Sorry for having hi-jacked your thread like this.
In answer to your original post: The B737-800 is a good aircraft (all those Boing operators cant be wrong) and I wonder if SAA ever thought about the hidden costs of getting all those A320s and replacing the Fluffies. Some slick saleman was at work here. Or maybe somebody got sponsored a Merc or even a nice BMW, like the fiasco for the defence contracts.
Viva Viva
126,7 is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2004, 08:01
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Blighty
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
126.7,

How do you make the SP fly at .90? Pull the thrust levers back half an inch!!
springbok449 is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2004, 03:07
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Front Left, Right and Center.
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
126,7

It takes Lufthansa 9h50 from JNB to FRA and it takes SAA in the bus nearly 11h15. Not keeping up at all.
Direct Great circle track JNB - FRA is 4675nm.

9h50 would mean that the B747's AVERAGE speed = 475KT.
For the A340 to do it in 11h15 it would have to be doing 415KT AVERAGE.

Anyone with a whizz wheel? What does 0.02/3 Mach equate to at F350, -56C??
El Peligroso is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2004, 05:59
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK South Coast
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey you guys............ I'll try again!!!!!

What is happening about SAAs Airbus order? I heard that the A320 order was cancelled (saving $50million in short term costs) and that the airline was less than happy with the performance of the A340-600 (costing a packet in maintainance costs).
I didn't mean it to be a Boeing vs Airbus bash - afterall we all know that Boeing comes out tops everytime!!!
Mode7 is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2004, 21:00
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The World, although sometimes I wonder
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing comes out tops every time??/

You should see an A330 out climb a B777.

Give me an airbus any time....................................
Goldfish Jack is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2004, 05:38
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: oppieplaas
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
May be some one can help me with this. Why is it that I have never heard a AirBus asking if there are any speed restictions for them in the climb, but hear the Boeing ask that regularly??
contraxdog is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2004, 01:57
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First to FL430 wins!!!! No contest. Boeing for me over tupperware anytime
sanook is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.