Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > African Aviation
Reload this Page >

BA flies its own fuel to CT

Wikiposts
Search
African Aviation Regional issues that affect the numerous pilots who work in this area of the world.

BA flies its own fuel to CT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Oct 2004, 07:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cape Town (where else?)
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA flies its own fuel to CT

News24.com: 18/10/2004

BA flies its own fuel to CT

Rajaa Azzakani

Johannesburg - Fuel restrictions have been in force since last week at Cape Town International - the country's second-largest airport.

By Friday, the situation was so desperate that British Airways/Comair flew extra fuel to Cape Town for its aircraft.

Extra fuel was also shipped from Durban to Cape Town in an attempt to alleviate the shortage.

Fuel giant Shell, which heads up the fuel agency at the airport, told Beeld on Monday that it would comment only on Tuesday.

Girish Gopal, acting chief executive of the Airports Company (Acsa) in Cape Town, confirmed that restrictions were being placed on aircraft.

Each aircraft is allowed the minimum amount of fuel to reach its destination.

Gopal said notices were sent to all the airlines to bring the fuel shortage to their attention.

'Problems at the Calref refinery'

"Most of the airlines used to fill up in Cape Town and only top up in Johannesburg. We asked them to rather do it the other way around."

He said the crisis had come about because of "problems at the Calref refinery".

Gopal said this was the second time he had experienced a fuel shortage at the airport. He had been working at Cape Town International for four years.

He referred all further questions to Shell.

Madelain Roscher of BA confirmed they had been transporting aircraft fuel from Johannesburg to Cape Town for the past four days.

"We just want to assure our passengers this holds no danger for them.

"It does, however, hold negative financial implications for BA. Fuel is more expensive in Johannesburg than Cape Town."
Deanw is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2004, 14:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: R21
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Most of the airlines used to fill up in Cape Town and only top up in Johannesburg. We asked them to rather do it the other way around"
Very few sensible airlines operating medium/heavy transport jets these days would "fill up" their aircraft, especially on the JNB-CPT route, going either way. Tankering costs money not because fuel is more expensive in JNB, but because of the weight vs fuel consumption factor.
Rotates Lowly is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2004, 15:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: As hot as hell, but lots more fun
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rotates Lowly,
On a short sector like CPT-JNB, the cost of tankering is almost negligible for a heavy jet and more than offsets the difference in price between the two cities - hence the practice of tankering. When you start operating sectors in excess of say, 5 hours, does the weight of the extra fuel come into the equation. But it all depends on the price at the potential tankering station vs the price at the other end. Or so I'm told....
Dumpvalve is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2004, 17:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SOUTH AFRICA
Age: 66
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Have to agree with Rotates Lowly on this one! On aircraft like the B727-200 you pay a penalty of almost 10% for the fuel you are tankering FAJS-FACT(100kg burnt for every ton carried). The 737-200 is in the 3% range, still not worthwhile inside our borders.

You only tanker if there are no fuel on the other side (like in Zim), or if the fuel price is through the roof (like in Zim).

Fire away!
REAL ORCA is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2004, 02:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: As hot as hell, but lots more fun
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
REAL ORCA, I'm sure what you say re the B727 is correct, but I'm talking about a heavy jet, where tankering sectors of this length are commonplace. I also stated that it depends on the fuel price at both ends.
Dumpvalve is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2004, 12:43
  #6 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
This thread has recently run in PPRuNe Tech Log
PAXboy is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2004, 21:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: fl 450
Age: 59
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dumpvalve
Tankering is linked to
1. Difference in fuel cost
2. Length of sector
3. Type of aircraft, it is actually worked out from a page in the performance manual which is produced by the manufacturer.

There are no domestic routes which BA/Comair operate at the moment which are feasable for tankering with the types they operate.
dickyd737 is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2004, 11:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: As hot as hell, but lots more fun
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dickyd737,
I'm sure you are 100% correct wrt the BA/Comair situation and their tankering policy. However, that's not what I ever referred to.
What I stated was that with heavy jets, it's not uncommon to have tankering sectors 700nm and longer. I just used the CPT-JNB sector as an example. This is probably more acute when crossing international borders, as the fuel price domestically does not vary a great deal.
Dumpvalve is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2004, 04:20
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dumpvalve....

We operate HEAVY JETS, the cost of tankering certainly isn’t negligible, we have the cheapest fuel in the world and we certainly think twice about the amount to tanker!

Mutt.
mutt is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2004, 05:19
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: As hot as hell, but lots more fun
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mutt,
I'm certainly not going to debate your company's fuel tankering policy with you - I simply stated that tankering is not uncommon on short sectors - that is an indisputable fact.
Bottom line: if tankering didn't save money, companies wouldn't do it.
Dumpvalve is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.