Reports coming in that the accident happened on runway 34R which was being used for departures.
|
Originally Posted by milhouse999
(Post 11566080)
It seems in the last few minutes scores of firefighting assets have turned up and started to fight the fire. An hour after the incident.
Have they really had to await resources from far away for this? |
Originally Posted by Expatrick
(Post 11566072)
Y'all be relieved to know that CNN have concluded that the incident with the JAL aircraft was not connected to the earthquake.
|
Originally Posted by PC767
(Post 11566045)
One fire truck visible and no foam. They seem to be letting it burn.
|
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11566084)
Reports coming in that the accident happened on runway 34R which was being used for departures.
|
Originally Posted by Northern Monkey
(Post 11566079)
Be interested to see, if reports are accurate, whether the coast guard crew were familiar with Haneda airport or were operating there for the first time ever/in a while due to recent events.
|
Originally Posted by Jonty
(Post 11566083)
Then I have to remind myself that the fire service allowed the fire to take hold.
|
No ADS-B target visible for the coast guard plane, neither on ground nor in-flight. Approach and landing speeds looking normal.
Flight appears to be JAL516 from Okinawa, rego JA13XJ hex id 8467d8 |
Appears to collide with the other aircraft on runway.
https://x.com/6twenty5/status/1742126071305445642?s=20 |
Haneda normally has a few coast guard aircraft on the north ramp where we often get parked for medevac ops. Those include a few G-V, F-2000's. They also have Saab 340, Dash 8-300 and Kingairs. Taking a hit from an A350 on landing is going to be a bad day for the coast guard crew.
The video of the fire fighting efforts is disturbing. If they ran out of AFFF or whatever they are using that fast, I would be surprised. It appears they were applying minimum effort with one guy at the rear with a hand held hose, and one from the front. Apparently the fuselage likes burning after all. There is going to be some fall out after this one, while it permitted the first 90 seconds window fine, the whole plane being consumed by fire is going to take some explaining. Vale to the coast guard crew, one apparently escaped. Looks like the RH engine on the A350 continued to run for some time, the E&E bay would have taken a hit, it appears to be running during the evacuation. Coast Guard aircraft was apparently one of the Dash-8 300's |
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11566084)
Reports coming in that the accident happened on runway 34R which was being used for departures.
|
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11566084)
Reports coming in that the accident happened on runway 34R which was being used for departures.
|
Complete hull loss, still violently burning now through (somewhat bizarre) Live footage provided by various news outlets. I suppose at least a positive to take from this is that the fire developed slowly, affording those onboard enough time to evacuate safely.
|
I'm getting reports from a relative who lives in Japan. Latest news is that 5 crew members on the Coastguard aircraft are likely to have perished with only 1 pilot known to have survived at this time
|
JAL flight 516 was from Shin Chitose in Hokkaido.
|
Originally Posted by San Diego kid
(Post 11566086)
Everyone was safe out the plane, plane is destroyed anyway, why risk more lives. Let it burn untill you’re sure there won’t be any explosions.
I completely understand your point however there seemed to be a small response to this initial incident with firefighting assets arriving very late (an hour after the incident). I am sure all of this will come out in the subsequent reports and focus should be on the safe evacuation of pax. |
A screengrab from the video in Post #30:
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....ff19cdfe14.jpg Plane is moving rapidly right-left, on a runway. It does look as if it is nose-down. I hope everyone really did evacuate safely. IB |
Fire department statement that the remaining 5 Coastguard crew members have been accounted for.
No comment on their condition. |
Originally Posted by milhouse999
(Post 11566109)
I completely understand your point however there seemed to be a small response to this initial incident with firefighting assets arriving very late (an hour after the incident). I am sure all of this will come out in the subsequent reports and focus should be on the safe evacuation of pax.
|
It is quite interesting to see how the carbon-fibre-reinforced polymers in the fuselage hold up against the flames.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:45. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.