B17 Texas Raiders
Hearing rumours (only rumours) that B17 Texas Raiders may have got into difficulties at an air show.
If this is the case hope all are safe. |
Sadly it's very bad news... ASN reports possible collision with a P-51 or P-63...
Edit: does appear to have been a collision with a P-63, Wings Over Dallas Airshow... https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/301048 |
Definitely mid-air:
RIP skadi |
Damn. That's shocking and very sad.
Here is a video from the Daily Mail. Approach with caution. The collision is probably the worst I have ever seen. Terrible, simply terrible. Planes crash in mid-air at Wings Over Dallas event, sending debris flying | Daily Mail Online RIP all involved. Very sad day :-( |
Reading on other sites that there are survivors!
|
Strange how the Mail say the B17 collided with the Kingcobra. Looks totally the other way around.
Horific accident I am sure there will be repurcussions. |
Originally Posted by Tech Guy
(Post 11329873)
Horific accident I am sure there will be repurcussions.
|
https://9gag.com/gag/aVbDvDn?ref=android
Apologies for the website, video shows the collision and crash |
Holly CRAP! What was that Kingcobra pilot thinking? That almost looks intentional!
|
Originally Posted by Tech Guy
(Post 11329873)
Strange how the Mail say the B17 collided with the Kingcobra. Looks totally the other way around.
In reality, under the cowl blind spot of the P-63! How he ended up in this position will be the question. |
Originally Posted by Lake1952
(Post 11329867)
Reading on other sites that there are survivors!
|
Originally Posted by 212man
(Post 11329892)
You seriously think so?
|
Report in the Dallas Morning News suggests that debris has landed on a highway. No news of injuries etc. yet, but agree it looks really bad. No time for anyone to eject, if that was even possible.
|
Originally Posted by bnt
(Post 11329895)
Report in the Dallas Morning News suggests that debris has landed on a highway. No news of injuries etc. yet, but agree it looks really bad. No time for anyone to eject, if that was even possible.
|
Collision looks to have occurred more or less over the threshold of 31 - "light" debris seems to be scattered between the runway end and Highway 67, but the majority is on airport property I'd think. As ehwatezedoing says, the P-63 pilot seems to have been utterly unsighted while curving in, there were two fighters preceding, probably P-51s, who appeared to be following the runway heading, ahead and to the left of the B-17.
|
In one of the videos there is an aircraft (possibly a P51) about half a mile ahead of the B-17,that the Cobra pilot may have been trying to join on,judging by his speed.
Another reminder of the very `close shave` between the 2 Mustangs at Duxford a few years ago,joining on the B-17;you have to see where all the aircraft are,and keep them in sight all the time..if you can`t,then f*** off out... , |
Originally Posted by 212man
(Post 11329904)
Errr, no - neither aircraft had ejection seats! That’s not to say some crew may have been ejected, looking at the videos.
Looking at the videos doesn't look at all survivable but happy to be proved wrong. |
Originally Posted by uxb99
(Post 11329910)
While I think it's very unlikely to survive such an incident if thrown clear a chute may deploy, or if inside the aircraft parts can on occasion float to earth gently.
Looking at the videos doesn't look at all survivable but happy to be proved wrong. |
Originally Posted by tdracer
(Post 11329884)
Holly CRAP! What was that Kingcobra pilot thinking? That almost looks intentional!
|
My reaction too (although I stop short of "intentional") |
Dallas air show crash
Crash at Dallas airshow. Graphic footage all over twitter and media which I am not going to attach. A P-63 Kingcobra collides with a B17 bomber, the Kingcobra disintegrates and the B17 splits in 2 and hits the ground in a fireball. All over very quickly. Utterly terrible to watch. Condolences to families of everyone involved.
Seems to be already causing further controversy about air shows and old planes. Can I ask how others here feel about airshows and old planes? Some here may even have participated as these shows. My grandfather took me to quite a few as a child. Never saw an accident and they seemed days of great excitement to me as a kid, but I'd quickly admit to not knowing much about current day airshows at all , and I've no idea how most people on here would feel about them now. |
It may later be proven that the P-63 was not controllable, but at the moment it doesn't look like the aircraft had much of anything to do with it - and there's a thread in close calls. Probably best to keep discussion to that thread.
|
Watching it from the rear I doubt the pilot could see the B17 as his nose and wings would be masking it… absolutely tragic :(
film from the rear of the B17 ( some foul language ) |
There are aerial pictures of the wreckage, see
https://www.fox4news.com/news/dallas...-airport-crash |
In the left hand turn, with that amount of bank, the P-63 was blind to anything outside of his turn radius. He wouldn't have seen the B-17 until immediately before he impacted at the trailing edge of the wing/fuselage join and sliced the tail off the B-17. With no tail, the bomber just nose dived in. It was all over for everyone in less than a couple of seconds, the P-63 was probably reduced to debris after the impact.
The rules of the air dictate that when converging with an aircraft from the right, you give way to the right (the B-17) but of course, that assumes you know there is something there in the first place. It was the P-63s pilot's responsibility to clear the turn, but what was the ATC status in all this? Was there an Air Show frequency? Was there positive control of the display, had it been rehearsed and briefed to a display coordinator? Or was it "turn up and give us a show?". The real tragedy is that when the accident report is finalized, it will not contain a single new element that couldn't have been cut and paste from many of the previous Air Show collisions. |
Both planes were reportedly based in Houston. A Commemorative Air Force spokesperson stated five persons were believed to have been aboard the B-17 and one aboard the P-63. There were no paying pax aboard the B-17 during the display.
Two aircraft out of Houston collide at Dallas Air Show - KPRC-TV Houston |
Different angle, different perspective. Taxying Stearman was lucky.
|
I can’t believe the Cobra pilot was coming in that fast with so many planes around him. Like he was the only one in that airspace.
Sad loss in lives a planes, thats for sure. |
Either dreadfully briefed and/or an amazingly careless bit of flying of the P63!
|
Originally Posted by unmanned_droid
(Post 11329936)
It may later be proven that the P-63 was not controllable, but at the moment it doesn't look like the aircraft had much of anything to do with it - and there's a thread in close calls. Probably best to keep discussion to that thread.
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11329941)
Watching it from the rear I doubt the pilot could see the B17 as his nose and wings would be masking it… absolutely tragic :(
film from the rear of the B17 ( some foul language ) https://twitter.com/Tendar/status/1591532648509349888
A brutally bad day. It is part of the heritage to keep the memory alive of what prior generations did, these airshows are worthy of respect and continuation. Lets not do this particular evolution again. 2's In, you are correct. I assumed the P63 was faster than the B-17, there is not much difference in speed, and post #37 shows that the P63 was belly up to the B17 for at least the last 5-6 seconds. To see the traffic, the speed difference would need to be higher. |
This is so sad. One of the things which makes it sad is the apparent appetite of audiences and pilots to see historically valuable flying antiques flown aggressively. Can we not just be content with seeing these magnificent airplanes simply fly at all, without having to see them maneuvered in a way which increases risk so much? We pilots should not need to be regulated into gentle flying, it should be pride and instinct to fly antiques with extra care and caution, considering their historical value. For the few antique airplanes I have flown, it's always been "fly it gently, as though it's irreplaceable"!
Absolutely nothing in our industry gets better because an aggressive pilot flies any aircraft and collides with another aircraft, or the ground, it's bad all the way around. I worry that some pilots are not afraid of f**king up enough to just fly it gently! When I worked with a well known US airplane restorer, formation flying (and thus air to air photography with their airplanes) was forbidden. This was because the progenitor of the excellent restoration process and STC for these airplanes was killed in an air to air with one of his own airplanes. I saw their point! Just fly the plane, forget the showing off! |
They really are irreplaceable.....especially the people in them when they are lost.
|
Originally Posted by SASless
(Post 11329990)
They really are irreplaceable.....especially the people in them when they are lost.
|
Originally Posted by tdracer
(Post 11329884)
Holly CRAP! What was that Kingcobra pilot thinking? That almost looks intentional!
|
A walk around of the accident P-63:
|
The pre display briefing of the 2021 show. Briefing starts at the 5.25 mark:
|
A longer view of a posted video:
|
Two's in - You're absolutely tight, he was blind in the turn. I can answer the rest of your questions about airshow coordination as I have been part of flying in that CAF show in the past myself. No ATC, control is with the airboss and there has been an extensive morning briefing maybe lasting an hour or more on what looks like madness but is actually a well choreographed show and all you hear during this performance is the airboss making sure everybody is doing what was briefed, he's talking non-stop for 20 minutes giving directions. I've been in this with 63 other airplanes. There are groups of trainers, fighters, bombers and cargos that work together. But... we're only human and there will always be one pilot out of synch or just "not get it".
|
Professional Pilots content - CNN quotes Allied Pilots Association as saying two of the B-17 crew were retirees from American Airlines.
Article gives the names, for those with a desire to know them. Not my place to publicize them here. https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/12/us/da...show-collision |
Mechanical problems?
Originally Posted by Two's in
(Post 11329946)
In the left hand turn, with that amount of bank, the P-63 was blind to anything outside of his turn radius. He wouldn't have seen the B-17 until immediately before he impacted at the trailing edge of the wing/fuselage join and sliced the tail off the B-17. With no tail, the bomber just nose dived in. It was all over for everyone in less than a couple of seconds, the P-63 was probably reduced to debris after the impact.
The rules of the air dictate that when converging with an aircraft from the right, you give way to the right (the B-17) but of course, that assumes you know there is something there in the first place. It was the P-63s pilot's responsibility to clear the turn, but what was the ATC status in all this? Was there an Air Show frequency? Was there positive control of the display, had it been rehearsed and briefed to a display coordinator? Or was it "turn up and give us a show?". The real tragedy is that when the accident report is finalized, it will not contain a single new element that couldn't have been cut and paste from many of the previous Air Show collisions. 1 - This group does a lot of shows 2 - Pilot knew there was a B-17 in the air, wouldn't he have made some attempt to know where all his fellow flyers were at any given time? 3 - The plane seems to be going kind of fast and from certain angles I've watched, is also losing altitude pretty fast. 4 - It just looks out of control to me. Caveat - I'm not a pilot, but my son is a fighter pilot for the USAF. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:56. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.