PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Accidents and Close Calls (https://www.pprune.org/accidents-close-calls-139/)
-   -   Dallas air show crash (https://www.pprune.org/accidents-close-calls/649802-dallas-air-show-crash.html)

uxb99 12th Nov 2022 18:58

B17 Texas Raiders
 
Hearing rumours (only rumours) that B17 Texas Raiders may have got into difficulties at an air show.
If this is the case hope all are safe.

treadigraph 12th Nov 2022 19:03

Sadly it's very bad news... ASN reports possible collision with a P-51 or P-63...

Edit: does appear to have been a collision with a P-63, Wings Over Dallas Airshow...

https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/301048

skadi 12th Nov 2022 19:22

Definitely mid-air:
RIP


skadi

uxb99 12th Nov 2022 19:25

Damn. That's shocking and very sad.
Here is a video from the Daily Mail. Approach with caution. The collision is probably the worst I have ever seen. Terrible, simply terrible.
Planes crash in mid-air at Wings Over Dallas event, sending debris flying | Daily Mail Online
RIP all involved.
Very sad day :-(

Lake1952 12th Nov 2022 19:58

Reading on other sites that there are survivors!

Tech Guy 12th Nov 2022 20:07

Strange how the Mail say the B17 collided with the Kingcobra. Looks totally the other way around.

Horific accident I am sure there will be repurcussions.

uxb99 12th Nov 2022 20:11


Originally Posted by Tech Guy (Post 11329873)
Horific accident I am sure there will be repurcussions.

More ammunition for those that want air shows banned. However, seeing this kind of accident, they do have a point. Totally unnecessary and preventable.

drichard 12th Nov 2022 20:12

https://9gag.com/gag/aVbDvDn?ref=android
Apologies for the website, video shows the collision and crash

tdracer 12th Nov 2022 20:22

Holly CRAP! What was that Kingcobra pilot thinking? That almost looks intentional!

ehwatezedoing 12th Nov 2022 20:25


Originally Posted by Tech Guy (Post 11329873)
Strange how the Mail say the B17 collided with the Kingcobra. Looks totally the other way around.

No kidding, some of those videos if not in colour or date stamped could literally pass like a Kamikaze attack on a B-17 during WWII.
In reality, under the cowl blind spot of the P-63! How he ended up in this position will be the question.

212man 12th Nov 2022 20:34


Originally Posted by Lake1952 (Post 11329867)
Reading on other sites that there are survivors!

You seriously think so?

KRviator 12th Nov 2022 20:38


Originally Posted by 212man (Post 11329892)
You seriously think so?

I don't, but would love to be proven otherwise. Pilots and passengers have occasionally survived far worse.

bnt 12th Nov 2022 20:39

Report in the Dallas Morning News suggests that debris has landed on a highway. No news of injuries etc. yet, but agree it looks really bad. No time for anyone to eject, if that was even possible.

212man 12th Nov 2022 20:49


Originally Posted by bnt (Post 11329895)
Report in the Dallas Morning News suggests that debris has landed on a highway. No news of injuries etc. yet, but agree it looks really bad. No time for anyone to eject, if that was even possible.

Errr, no - neither aircraft had ejection seats! That’s not to say some crew may have been ejected, looking at the videos.

treadigraph 12th Nov 2022 20:54

Collision looks to have occurred more or less over the threshold of 31 - "light" debris seems to be scattered between the runway end and Highway 67, but the majority is on airport property I'd think. As ehwatezedoing says, the P-63 pilot seems to have been utterly unsighted while curving in, there were two fighters preceding, probably P-51s, who appeared to be following the runway heading, ahead and to the left of the B-17.

sycamore 12th Nov 2022 20:55

In one of the videos there is an aircraft (possibly a P51) about half a mile ahead of the B-17,that the Cobra pilot may have been trying to join on,judging by his speed.

Another reminder of the very `close shave` between the 2 Mustangs at Duxford a few years ago,joining on the B-17;you have to see where all the aircraft are,and keep them in sight all the time..if you can`t,then f*** off out...
,

uxb99 12th Nov 2022 20:56


Originally Posted by 212man (Post 11329904)
Errr, no - neither aircraft had ejection seats! That’s not to say some crew may have been ejected, looking at the videos.

While I think it's very unlikely to survive such an incident if thrown clear a chute may deploy, or if inside the aircraft parts can on occasion float to earth gently.
Looking at the videos doesn't look at all survivable but happy to be proved wrong.

212man 12th Nov 2022 21:07


Originally Posted by uxb99 (Post 11329910)
While I think it's very unlikely to survive such an incident if thrown clear a chute may deploy, or if inside the aircraft parts can on occasion float to earth gently.
Looking at the videos doesn't look at all survivable but happy to be proved wrong.

I’m pretty sure you’re not going to be proved wrong

LowObservable 12th Nov 2022 21:17


Originally Posted by tdracer (Post 11329884)
Holly CRAP! What was that Kingcobra pilot thinking? That almost looks intentional!

My reaction too (although I stop short of "intentional"). From one video that shows a wider angle, it looks as a number of aircraft including the B-17 were on a loose left-hand circuit for passes in front of the crowd line. Then the P-63 appears in frame, apparently well inside the circuit and at a higher speed, and converges on the bomber in a pursuit curve, pulling hard left at the last moment. Weird. Never seen anything like it.

212man 12th Nov 2022 21:26


My reaction too (although I stop short of "intentional")
I agree, but looks like criminal negligence

auldlassie 12th Nov 2022 21:29

Dallas air show crash
 
Crash at Dallas airshow. Graphic footage all over twitter and media which I am not going to attach. A P-63 Kingcobra collides with a B17 bomber, the Kingcobra disintegrates and the B17 splits in 2 and hits the ground in a fireball. All over very quickly. Utterly terrible to watch. Condolences to families of everyone involved.

Seems to be already causing further controversy about air shows and old planes. Can I ask how others here feel about airshows and old planes? Some here may even have participated as these shows. My grandfather took me to quite a few as a child. Never saw an accident and they seemed days of great excitement to me as a kid, but I'd quickly admit to not knowing much about current day airshows at all , and I've no idea how most people on here would feel about them now.

unmanned_droid 12th Nov 2022 21:34

It may later be proven that the P-63 was not controllable, but at the moment it doesn't look like the aircraft had much of anything to do with it - and there's a thread in close calls. Probably best to keep discussion to that thread.

NutLoose 12th Nov 2022 21:39

Watching it from the rear I doubt the pilot could see the B17 as his nose and wings would be masking it… absolutely tragic :(

film from the rear of the B17 ( some foul language )


NutLoose 12th Nov 2022 21:46

There are aerial pictures of the wreckage, see

https://www.fox4news.com/news/dallas...-airport-crash

Two's in 12th Nov 2022 21:49

In the left hand turn, with that amount of bank, the P-63 was blind to anything outside of his turn radius. He wouldn't have seen the B-17 until immediately before he impacted at the trailing edge of the wing/fuselage join and sliced the tail off the B-17. With no tail, the bomber just nose dived in. It was all over for everyone in less than a couple of seconds, the P-63 was probably reduced to debris after the impact.

The rules of the air dictate that when converging with an aircraft from the right, you give way to the right (the B-17) but of course, that assumes you know there is something there in the first place. It was the P-63s pilot's responsibility to clear the turn, but what was the ATC status in all this? Was there an Air Show frequency? Was there positive control of the display, had it been rehearsed and briefed to a display coordinator? Or was it "turn up and give us a show?". The real tragedy is that when the accident report is finalized, it will not contain a single new element that couldn't have been cut and paste from many of the previous Air Show collisions.

Carbon Bootprint 12th Nov 2022 22:02

Both planes were reportedly based in Houston. A Commemorative Air Force spokesperson stated five persons were believed to have been aboard the B-17 and one aboard the P-63. There were no paying pax aboard the B-17 during the display.

Two aircraft out of Houston collide at Dallas Air Show - KPRC-TV Houston

uxb99 12th Nov 2022 22:28

Different angle, different perspective. Taxying Stearman was lucky.

San Diego kid 12th Nov 2022 22:42

I can’t believe the Cobra pilot was coming in that fast with so many planes around him. Like he was the only one in that airspace.
Sad loss in lives a planes, thats for sure.

H Peacock 12th Nov 2022 23:06

Either dreadfully briefed and/or an amazingly careless bit of flying of the P63!

fdr 12th Nov 2022 23:19


Originally Posted by unmanned_droid (Post 11329936)
It may later be proven that the P-63 was not controllable, but at the moment it doesn't look like the aircraft had much of anything to do with it - and there's a thread in close calls. Probably best to keep discussion to that thread.

The P-63 is following pilot input immediately before the impact, I doubt that there was a control issue prior to impact.


Originally Posted by NutLoose (Post 11329941)
Watching it from the rear I doubt the pilot could see the B17 as his nose and wings would be masking it… absolutely tragic :(
film from the rear of the B17 ( some foul language )
https://twitter.com/Tendar/status/1591532648509349888

  • GLOC is unlikely but not impossible.
  • A medical event is always possible but that would tend to result in lowering g loads, and that would cause the flight path to degrade in a high bank turn, there is no onset of a descent part way through the turn. Keeping a high bank and reducing g reduces the rate of turn and that is not obviously evident, so the plane is likely to be under closed loop pilotage up to impact.
  • assuming that this was accidental, then the P-63 seems to be working towards a rejoin of the P-51 and other preceding little friends, and that puts the line of sight for the pilot of the P-63 above his head, and to the left, well away from Texas Raider's. I would think that target fixation on the rejoin of relatively hard to see aircraft against the ground background may have distracted the P-63 pilot from his basic requirement to keep clear of what should be obvious traffic that he/she is overtaking.
This hints to a bad set up of flight paths, whether preflight or inflight variation from plan. Would be interesting to know the pilots experience in flying mixed formations and in formation flying, rejoins etc.

A brutally bad day. It is part of the heritage to keep the memory alive of what prior generations did, these airshows are worthy of respect and continuation. Lets not do this particular evolution again.


2's In, you are correct. I assumed the P63 was faster than the B-17, there is not much difference in speed, and post #37 shows that the P63 was belly up to the B17 for at least the last 5-6 seconds. To see the traffic, the speed difference would need to be higher.

9 lives 12th Nov 2022 23:37

This is so sad. One of the things which makes it sad is the apparent appetite of audiences and pilots to see historically valuable flying antiques flown aggressively. Can we not just be content with seeing these magnificent airplanes simply fly at all, without having to see them maneuvered in a way which increases risk so much? We pilots should not need to be regulated into gentle flying, it should be pride and instinct to fly antiques with extra care and caution, considering their historical value. For the few antique airplanes I have flown, it's always been "fly it gently, as though it's irreplaceable"!

Absolutely nothing in our industry gets better because an aggressive pilot flies any aircraft and collides with another aircraft, or the ground, it's bad all the way around. I worry that some pilots are not afraid of f**king up enough to just fly it gently!

When I worked with a well known US airplane restorer, formation flying (and thus air to air photography with their airplanes) was forbidden. This was because the progenitor of the excellent restoration process and STC for these airplanes was killed in an air to air with one of his own airplanes. I saw their point! Just fly the plane, forget the showing off!

SASless 12th Nov 2022 23:54

They really are irreplaceable.....especially the people in them when they are lost.


Longtimer 13th Nov 2022 00:01


Originally Posted by SASless (Post 11329990)
They really are irreplaceable.....especially the people in them when they are lost.

Irreplaceable, the aircraft could be rebuilt / replicated, not so the people. Sad.

zac21 13th Nov 2022 01:22


Originally Posted by tdracer (Post 11329884)
Holly CRAP! What was that Kingcobra pilot thinking? That almost looks intentional!

In total agreement.

Flying Binghi 13th Nov 2022 01:50

A walk around of the accident P-63:



Flying Binghi 13th Nov 2022 01:52

The pre display briefing of the 2021 show. Briefing starts at the 5.25 mark:



Flying Binghi 13th Nov 2022 01:56

A longer view of a posted video:


Bobby G 13th Nov 2022 01:56

Two's in - You're absolutely tight, he was blind in the turn. I can answer the rest of your questions about airshow coordination as I have been part of flying in that CAF show in the past myself. No ATC, control is with the airboss and there has been an extensive morning briefing maybe lasting an hour or more on what looks like madness but is actually a well choreographed show and all you hear during this performance is the airboss making sure everybody is doing what was briefed, he's talking non-stop for 20 minutes giving directions. I've been in this with 63 other airplanes. There are groups of trainers, fighters, bombers and cargos that work together. But... we're only human and there will always be one pilot out of synch or just "not get it".

pattern_is_full 13th Nov 2022 03:05

Professional Pilots content - CNN quotes Allied Pilots Association as saying two of the B-17 crew were retirees from American Airlines.

Article gives the names, for those with a desire to know them. Not my place to publicize them here.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/12/us/da...show-collision

fighterflyer 13th Nov 2022 04:15

Mechanical problems?
 

Originally Posted by Two's in (Post 11329946)
In the left hand turn, with that amount of bank, the P-63 was blind to anything outside of his turn radius. He wouldn't have seen the B-17 until immediately before he impacted at the trailing edge of the wing/fuselage join and sliced the tail off the B-17. With no tail, the bomber just nose dived in. It was all over for everyone in less than a couple of seconds, the P-63 was probably reduced to debris after the impact.

The rules of the air dictate that when converging with an aircraft from the right, you give way to the right (the B-17) but of course, that assumes you know there is something there in the first place. It was the P-63s pilot's responsibility to clear the turn, but what was the ATC status in all this? Was there an Air Show frequency? Was there positive control of the display, had it been rehearsed and briefed to a display coordinator? Or was it "turn up and give us a show?". The real tragedy is that when the accident report is finalized, it will not contain a single new element that couldn't have been cut and paste from many of the previous Air Show collisions.

I am wondering if the P-63 might've had a mechanical problem or even pilot medical event? My thinking:
1 - This group does a lot of shows
2 - Pilot knew there was a B-17 in the air, wouldn't he have made some attempt to know where all his fellow flyers were at any given time?
3 - The plane seems to be going kind of fast and from certain angles I've watched, is also losing altitude pretty fast.
4 - It just looks out of control to me.

Caveat - I'm not a pilot, but my son is a fighter pilot for the USAF.


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:56.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.