Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

Light aircraft crash IWM Duxford

Wikiposts
Search
Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Light aircraft crash IWM Duxford

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Mar 2024, 16:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: England
Posts: 529
Received 242 Likes on 124 Posts
Light aircraft crash IWM Duxford

LBC radio reporting light aircraft crash at IWM Duxford.

Live updates as plane crashes at Duxford Airfield and emergency services called to scene - Cambridgeshire Live (cambridge-news.co.uk)

Last edited by DogTailRed2; 26th Mar 2024 at 16:53.
DogTailRed2 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2024, 17:09
  #2 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,623
Received 294 Likes on 162 Posts
A bad crash involving a visiting light aircraft.

Edit: actually does appear to be based at Duxford.

Last edited by treadigraph; 26th Mar 2024 at 17:32.
treadigraph is online now  
Old 26th Mar 2024, 17:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
Age: 62
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reported as being SR-22T G-RGSK
Big Eric is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2024, 18:53
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,819
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Eric
Reported as being SR-22T G-RGSK
Based at Duxford.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2024, 20:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,120
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Just seen a video supposedly of the accident and it is incredible not just what happened but how it came to be in the position to do what it did! Was there a prior issue?
Pittsextra is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2024, 20:15
  #6 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,623
Received 294 Likes on 162 Posts
It was doing circuits, ADSB seems to show it was OK during the third approach.

Pics appear to show that the CAPS deployed, presume may have been triggered by impact?
treadigraph is online now  
Old 26th Mar 2024, 20:34
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: England
Posts: 529
Received 242 Likes on 124 Posts
Just seen the video. CAPS deployed after impact.
DogTailRed2 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2024, 20:40
  #8 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,623
Received 294 Likes on 162 Posts
Just seen it also. Bloody hell.
treadigraph is online now  
Old 26th Mar 2024, 20:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,120
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Yeah not good. I'm surprised by the logic of the CAPS as it seems kind of irrelevant once impact with ground? OR we think just the level of energy in the crash disrupted things?

Pittsextra is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2024, 21:05
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: England
Posts: 529
Received 242 Likes on 124 Posts
Would appear CAPS deploys using a pyro rocket of some sort. So maybe the impact set of the ignition.
Cirrus Airframe Parachute System - Wikipedia
DogTailRed2 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2024, 21:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 753
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
FYI: The Cirrus CAPS is cable actuated. If the aircraft experiences a high impact load that distorts or breaks the airframe along that CAPS cable run from the T-handle in the ceiling to the actuator in the back, it can effectively "pull" the cable and initiate the CAPS rocket to fire. And just to add, the primary reason why the CAPS is mandatory in a Cirrus is its a spin certification requirement.
wrench1 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2024, 08:11
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cayley's County - Yorkshire
Posts: 293
Received 41 Likes on 16 Posts
IWM Closure

Following the accident, IWM have announced that it will be totally closed today and tomorrow, hoping to reopen on Good Friday.
I totally get that the airfield closure is as a result of the unfortunate accident and the AAIB presence and activity will drive its eventual reopening. However, since the airfield to all intents is totally separate from the IWM for everyone who arrives by road, why would it need to remain closed, particularly during the school holidays. Surely the obvious thing to do is to screen off the crash site from view and carry on as normal.
Comments or views ?
CAEBr is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2024, 08:27
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: big green wheely bin
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 1 Post
I imagine they don't want hordes of children/parents gathered round the parameter fence all trying to get a look at the crashed plane. It's not the sort of image of aviation they want to promote. The AAIB will recover the wreckage soon enough.
Jonty is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2024, 08:32
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: U.K.
Posts: 192
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
It’s not school holidays in this part of the world yet.

It would be hard to screen it off on such a large site, and why bother wasting time and effort.

I hate to say it, but there will probably be small parts of plane where the crowd (and it would be a crowd) would stand, and they may need those small parts.

They don’t need to be covered in press photographers.

Why not let them tidy it up and investigate with some dignity. The press are already all over Facebook asking for exact details.

When people go to Duxford, they enjoy seeing some aircraft flying, there will be no flying till Friday.

My honest view, what a self entitled sort of post, someone has died, they can find out why with minimal inconvenience and intrusion this way.
kghjfg is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2024, 09:46
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: UK
Posts: 34
Received 107 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by kghjfg
...

My honest view, what a self entitled sort of post, someone has died, they can find out why with minimal inconvenience and intrusion this way.
Agreed.
Mr Albert Ross is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2024, 10:52
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cayley's County - Yorkshire
Posts: 293
Received 41 Likes on 16 Posts
Well you're entitled to your opinion as I am to mine. I maintain that just because you can shut the entire site - is it justified?
The people at the museum will have zero interference with the investigation. Intrusion is admittedly more difficult to control but the police now regularly use screens at motorway accidents without inconveniencing their investigations, and nobody is going to stand staring at screens for hours while walking between the hangars.
Several people on here have already commented on having seen a video of the crash. It's not been released by any of the regular news sites, why search it out. The people who posted it and those who searched for and viewed it are guilty of intrusion, albeit not in person, but its a bit rich to then suggest that a blanket closure needs to be in place just in case the public might behave in the same way.
Ultimately, how far do you have to ring fence a site. I presume the M11 isnt shut ?
CAEBr is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2024, 11:23
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: England
Posts: 529
Received 242 Likes on 124 Posts
I think it's appropriate to close Duxford out of respect just unfortunate that the accident happened on one of it's busiest weekends. Duxford is just a museum at the end of the day and the accident, recovery must take precedence.

A general question regarding Duxford as an airfield. Does Duxford operate like any local airfield i.e. you can base your aircraft out of there? I always thought the airfield was just to facilitate the museum and the operations based therein?
DogTailRed2 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2024, 11:46
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,794
Received 52 Likes on 42 Posts
No need to discuss this as we're not the ones making this decision. I can think of several reasons to keep the site closed for a bit, including the museum wanting to provide some relief to their staff and volunteers who may have been involved or saw the accident. But nobody has asked me for advice...
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2024, 13:57
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,819
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by DogTailRed2
I think it's appropriate to close Duxford out of respect just unfortunate that the accident happened on one of it's busiest weekends. Duxford is just a museum at the end of the day and the accident, recovery must take precedence.

A general question regarding Duxford as an airfield. Does Duxford operate like any local airfield i.e. you can base your aircraft out of there? I always thought the airfield was just to facilitate the museum and the operations based therein?
See my earlier post about the accident aircraft being based at Duxford.

While many of the based aircraft are connected to the museum and restoration activities, residents also include a number of assorted Cessnas, Pipers, etc.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2024, 14:44
  #20 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,623
Received 294 Likes on 162 Posts
Has been confirmed that the pilot did not survive..
treadigraph is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.