Extra 230 crash Oxfordshire 2/4/22
I can only think of a few reasons to jump out of an aircraft if it wasn`t being `stunted and bunted` at the time;
loss of the prop which may take it out of the C of G envelope;may have broken engine mounts..
`Flutter` of the elevator/tailplane,although it looks like half the tailplane and both elevators are intact;
Massive fuel leak into the cockpit,assuming fuel tank is fwd of front seat..
And I`ve had experience of both the last two whilst testing for the PFA(as was)...
loss of the prop which may take it out of the C of G envelope;may have broken engine mounts..
`Flutter` of the elevator/tailplane,although it looks like half the tailplane and both elevators are intact;
Massive fuel leak into the cockpit,assuming fuel tank is fwd of front seat..
And I`ve had experience of both the last two whilst testing for the PFA(as was)...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@Lomcevak has very reasonably pointed out just some of the very good reasons to bail out. In hindsight they are obvious but the list is not exhaustive as I’m sure he would agree. What is true in every case is that if you have the good fortune of wearing a parachute you must also learn to how to get out. If you are carry a passenger you are obliged to brief them as well. May I suggest the following? Firstly, at less than 3,000 feet make your mind up to leave as quickly as possible. Secondly, after you have decided to jump unlatch the canopy and then undo your straps. You do not need the wait for the canopy to detach. Next, if you have control, push hard and you will be flung out else jump. Lastly, the moment you are out look for your D ring and with both hands pull hard. If you have the time (and steering) you may steer the parachute to a best possible landing and/or into wind. Then prepare for the impact. In this case I believe the Extra’s canopy shattered in flight. This resulted in the pilot being blinded by canopy shards. Not being able to see to perform a landing he very sensibly decided to bail out.
In this case I believe the Extra’s canopy shattered in flight. This resulted in the pilot being blinded by canopy shards.
Common sense,and a hard-hat and visor.....
was it a birdstrike? I’ve never considered wearing eye protection in a canopied aircraft.
Gnome de PPRuNe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,635
Received 300 Likes
on
168 Posts
Canopy failure thought to be due to poor bonding with the frame:
https://assets.publishing.service.go...MIIL_04-24.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.go...MIIL_04-24.pdf
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 422 Likes
on
222 Posts
That is an unusually thorough and comprehensive investigation for a light aircraft accident. Well done to the team responsible.
Conclusion for layman: Canopy not glued on proper, like.
Conclusion for layman: Canopy not glued on proper, like.
Interesting note right at the end that the BFU (German AAIB) think the canopy not being locked properly was the cause of the accident. The fatigue cracking and subsequent shattering of the canopy seem to be well evidenced, though?
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 422 Likes
on
222 Posts
It is not impossible that the pilot unlatched it out of instinct prior to abandoning the airframe, bearing in mind that he wasn’t exactly sure what had occurred but knew he was hitting the silk.
According to today's Daily Telegraph the pilot "ejected". Rolls eyes. No comments allowed on the article so unable to put the so-called journalist right. Surprised they didn't describe it as a jet.
Gnome de PPRuNe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,635
Received 300 Likes
on
168 Posts
Blackfriar yes, I was frustrated by the inability to comment! 
Apparently Extra have issued a service bulletin to correct potential deficiencies in the bonding process.
Apparently Extra have issued a service bulletin to correct potential deficiencies in the bonding process.
My guess is that there had been a significant risk of injuries/deaths on the ground, given it impacted a block of flats, so warranted a more thorough investigation.
Had a canopy fall off a grob twin astir when being screamed at by the duty instructor at Worcester ZA to clear the runway asap.
On close inspection during its annual fetish the fool who carried it out had removed the hinge bolts, glued the hinges to the canopy with epoxy, added P38 then spray painted over it.
Turned out to be the duty dogs body who was a car dealer..stopped b@llocking me without admitting it was he but said it was a good job I hadn’t done any Aeros..which I had but only loops, chandels and the odd stall turn..now if I had attempted a slow roll maybe it would have been different as I’m crap at them.
On close inspection during its annual fetish the fool who carried it out had removed the hinge bolts, glued the hinges to the canopy with epoxy, added P38 then spray painted over it.
Turned out to be the duty dogs body who was a car dealer..stopped b@llocking me without admitting it was he but said it was a good job I hadn’t done any Aeros..which I had but only loops, chandels and the odd stall turn..now if I had attempted a slow roll maybe it would have been different as I’m crap at them.
