Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

Afghanistan: Dassault Falcon 10 jet crash Jan 2024

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Afghanistan: Dassault Falcon 10 jet crash Jan 2024

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd January 2024 | 12:13
  #21 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,137
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
Film of the wreckage and survivors.


NutLoose is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2024 | 01:05
  #22 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 85
From: S.E.Asia
This from AKIpress News Agency in the Kyrgyz Republic.

AKIPRESS.COM - Four people survived the crash of the Falcon 10 private plane in Afghanistan, the Russian Federal Air Transport Agency reported with reference to the Russian embassy.

"Local ground search and rescue found the Falcon 10 aircraft (registration number RA-09011). Of the six people on board the plane, four are alive (they have various injuries); the fate of two people is being clarified," the Federal Air Transport Agency said.

After the crash of a plane with Russians on board, the Investigative Committee of Russia opened a criminal case into violation of traffic safety rules and operation of air transport, which through negligence resulted in the death of two or more people (Part 3 of Article 263 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).

The plane belonged to the Russian company Athletic Group and a private individual; the plane was performing a charter ambulance flight on the route Gaya (India) - Tashkent (Uzbekistan) - Zhukovsky (Russia). According to preliminary data, the cause of the crash was the failure of two engines, TASS and REN TV sources reported.

There were six people on board: four crew members and two passengers. The passengers were a businessman from Volgograd, Anatoly Evsyukov, and his wife Anna. The plane carried out a “private medical evacuation” of Anna Evsyukova, accompanied by her husband.



More information here.https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/350051

Last edited by Mike Flynn; 23rd January 2024 at 01:19.
Mike Flynn is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2024 | 01:29
  #23 (permalink)  
fdr
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 4,426
From: 3rd Rock, #29B
Originally Posted by MLHeliwrench
So Russians are buying N reg planes and using US companies for training (Flight Safety is owned by Berkshire Hathaway). How is Russian money paying for this?
training can be done on the aircraft for a type rating, however, that requires TSA approval, under the foreign student program, The requirement is for the training, not the checking, if they already had a license and type, but pretty sure that given they are operating from a criminal state, that is currently conducting war crimes, are doing illegal operations, which may well include the basis that the approvals to fly out of Thailand, India etc were based on, then not sure that is of any concern to them. They may find new adventures around Avdiivka in the near future though, without the need for their licenses that should be a question from ICAO as to how the Russian CAA permitted such an operation to depart, and enter and abuse other ICAO airspace. (given Vlads status on international law, that is probably not on his horizon either, and ICAO has all of the interest in compliance of a bloated bureaucracy anywhere).

It is not always illegal to do an operation that colours close to charter, but these clowns would not likely be interested in any compliance to the ICAO norms of Annex 6 Part I.

Shame, that was a nice DA10, MSN 128 IIRC.


Looking at the registration from the FAA, it was registered with the FAA in August 22 and de registered in September 23. I had info on it in July 22 on what would have been the temporary FAA registration pink-slip/flywire. It is curious that the registration has been reserved still by the same DE entity, so it may be that the plane was never sold to Russia, this may be a lease of the aircraft, in which case, good luck getting the rubles out of Russia. The earlier owners were in Morocco, and they had a nice fleet of Falcon 10 (incl MSN 120) and Falcon 20's. Their planes were pretty nicely kept by the records they provided.

Last edited by fdr; 23rd January 2024 at 01:44. Reason: PS
fdr is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2024 | 01:32
  #24 (permalink)  
fdr
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 4,426
From: 3rd Rock, #29B
Looks like the survivors are the crew, not Mr and Mrs Unfortunate Choice.
fdr is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2024 | 09:49
  #25 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 85
From: S.E.Asia
I find it remarkable that they overflew Lahore knowing the amount of fuel remaining.
Mike Flynn is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2024 | 17:05
  #26 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 879
Likes: 177
From: Itinerant
Originally Posted by Mike Flynn
I find it remarkable that they overflew Lahore knowing the amount of fuel remaining.
I find many things about this occurrence to be remarkable, and some aspects almost unbelievable...

grizzled is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2024 | 17:31
  #27 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 14
From: Europe
Some news say both pilots were a co-owners of this aircraft along with a spouse of one of them. Criminal investigation is open and all of them facing about 10 years in jail…. If so I would bet 99.99% it was not the first time they flew it commercially without having AOC nor ATPL…
CargoOne is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2024 | 22:00
  #28 (permalink)  
fdr
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 4,426
From: 3rd Rock, #29B
Originally Posted by CargoOne
Some news say both pilots were a co-owners of this aircraft along with a spouse of one of them. Criminal investigation is open and all of them facing about 10 years in jail…. If so I would bet 99.99% it was not the first time they flew it commercially without having AOC nor ATPL…
aircraft was de-registered in the USA in Sept 2023, so on the new rego with Russia, it hasn't been on that for long, but then they may have a willing audience given the state of Russian aircraft today. There will be a pretty close inspection on the sales documents related to the time on the US rego though, particularly the on sale, did it comply with current restrictions etc. As to not having an ATPL, the DA10 is a transport category aircraft, and would normally require an ATPL to operate, but Russia is Russia. (In the USA, they could fly with a PPL, but they do need a rating per §61.31(a), both (1) and (2). USA ain't Russia...).
fdr is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2024 | 22:27
  #29 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 277
From: Asia
With a PPL, 2400 hours total time, minimal time on type and not being properly rested, I doubt the Captains decision making skills were at the required level. Any flight which operates near the envelope of an aircraft’s capabilities needs careful monitoring and the crew need to be ready with an alternative plan if things don’t go as expected.

A reputable operator would have provided suitably qualified and experienced crew, and not pushed the aircraft’s performance to its limit.
krismiler is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2024 | 10:42
  #30 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,137
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
and not pushed the aircraft’s performance to its limit
Or in this case, sadly past it.
NutLoose is offline  
Reply
Old 25th January 2024 | 00:23
  #31 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 119
From: Southern Shores of Old Lusitania Kingdom
Does anyone knows wich was the route they took on the first trip from Russia till Thai.
Wich airports did they choose to stop/gas and go?
JanetFlight is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2024 | 05:41
  #32 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 137
Likes: 72
From: UK
I suspect anybody with a PPL about to do 10 years in a Russian jail will find themselves volunteered for any SMOs that might be in progress..
arf23 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2024 | 10:34
  #33 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 343
Likes: 173
From: Scotland
Can't put my finger on it, but the whole story has a reek about it.
Thrust Augmentation is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2024 | 18:00
  #34 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 879
Likes: 177
From: Itinerant
Originally Posted by Thrust Augmentation
Can't put my finger on it, but the whole story has a reek about it.
Exactly what I was alluding to in my post (#26) above. My (too many) years of experience related to aviation operations in challenging locales, and the (oft-related) matter of aircraft and companies of dubious registration, suggests that the truth behind this occurrence is far more convoluted than your usual "miscalculation leads to fuel shortage leads to forced landing" story.
grizzled is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2024 | 18:57
  #35 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 856
Likes: 67
From: North Cheshire
Notwithstanding the other issues, the choice of Zhukovsky as the destination airport with an apparently seriously ill passenger seems an odd one, Zhukovsky is miles from anywhere, and certainly a half-decent hospital. The best private hospital in Moscow is the Botkin, and the nearest airport would be Sheremetyevo, but perhaps the checking there would be more rigorous than Zhukovsky...
barry lloyd is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.