Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

747 Cargolux emergency landing

Wikiposts
Search
Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

747 Cargolux emergency landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th May 2023, 18:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: France
Age: 62
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
747 Cargolux emergency landing

A 747 Cargolux stuck on the runway at Findel Airport Luxembourg
few missing wheels on the main gear and hydraulic spillage

Last edited by Pilot DAR; 14th May 2023 at 19:15. Reason: typo
heavylanding is offline  
Old 14th May 2023, 19:25
  #2 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,634
Received 300 Likes on 168 Posts
treadigraph is offline  
Old 14th May 2023, 19:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Right main body gear truck oscillating on touchdown with subsequent departure?
BFSGrad is offline  
Old 14th May 2023, 20:08
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: France
Age: 62
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by heavylanding
A 747 Cargolux stuck on the runway at Findel Airport Luxembourg
few missing wheels on the main gear and hydraulic spillage
Cargolux would like to confirm that one of its aircraft, B747-400F bearing registration mark LX-OCV, suffered a significant landing incident at Luxembourg airport on Sunday evening at 18:52. The aircraft was unable to retract its landing gear on take-off from Luxembourg. As a result, it was forced to safely dump fuel in order to return to land at the airport. On its landing role its right body landing gear detached from the aircraft. The aircraft however came to a controlled stop and was attended to by the emergency services. No persons on board nor on the ground suffered any injuries. The relevant authorities have been informed of the incident. The aircraft remains on the runway and recovery efforts are underway.
heavylanding is offline  
Old 14th May 2023, 21:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Good reminder around the dangers re loose objects which have the ability to be a missile as such. That gear would be at least 3T, those folks making the video will be lucky it wasn’t headed towards them.

Noted that on a airshow video recently. Aircraft misjudged a manoeuvre, came very close to the ground, wasn’t the aircraft as such that became the issue, was the loose objects on the ground afterwards which got swept up and became projectiles.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 15th May 2023, 01:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cab of a Freight Train
Posts: 1,219
Received 122 Likes on 62 Posts
Is it me, or does the right body gear seem to be at a different angle to the left prior to touchdown?
KRviator is online now  
Old 15th May 2023, 02:16
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern Shores of Lusitania Kingdom
Age: 53
Posts: 858
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by KRviator
Is it me, or does the right body gear seem to be at a different angle to the left prior to touchdown?
You are right...not to the left but the tilt was different from the other side (the correct one), hence the unability to retract and broken after TD...per this clip »»»

JanetFlight is offline  
Old 15th May 2023, 09:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Surrey
Posts: 45
Received 27 Likes on 9 Posts
That is some lump to be bouncing along the tarmac. One wheel unit is heavy enough but 4 plus brake units and the truck.
Rebus is offline  
Old 15th May 2023, 09:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: same planet as yours
Posts: 551
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
some damage close-ups
DIBO is offline  
Old 15th May 2023, 11:21
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: It used to be an island...
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the comments we can also learn how to say "We can fix that with some speed tape" in French ( c'est réparable avec du duck tape non? )
nicolai is offline  
Old 15th May 2023, 12:34
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mud Island
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stand well back?

It's easy to be smart after the event but surely we should not have any unnecessary vehicles or light aircraft at close-in holding points during a planned emergency landing involving 300+ tons of heavy metal? Just a thought for ATC? Revert to at least LoViz procedures? No aircraft or passenger bus would survive a collision with 3 or 4 tons of gear.

Last edited by offa; 15th May 2023 at 12:38. Reason: Add
offa is offline  
Old 15th May 2023, 13:28
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In the Air
Age: 78
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems to me the torque links for that body gear broke/came undone during to T/O roll resulting in the bogey angle being out of what and preventing gear retraction and finally, severe truck shimmy and leaving the aircraft. Also a common defect with NLGs on many different aircraft types. Good job the 747 has four main gears!.
lincman is offline  
Old 15th May 2023, 14:22
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Surrey
Posts: 45
Received 27 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by lincman
Seems to me the torque links for that body gear broke/came undone during to T/O roll resulting in the bogey angle being out of what and preventing gear retraction and finally, severe truck shimmy and leaving the aircraft. Also a common defect with NLGs on many different aircraft types. Good job the 747 has four main gears!.
Good job it was a body gear and not a wing gear, otherwise No. 4 engine would be scraping the ground.
Rebus is offline  
Old 15th May 2023, 14:57
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Horsham
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like CLX the same aircraft had a heavy landing a few weeks back


LX-OCV

Thanks BFS Grad & hans brinker...
I stand corrected!


Last edited by XL189; 15th May 2023 at 18:24.
XL189 is offline  
Old 15th May 2023, 15:22
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by XL189
Looks like the same aircraft had a heavy landing a few weeks back

LX-OCV
The 4/15/2023 #2 pod strike incident was LX-ECV.
BFSGrad is offline  
Old 15th May 2023, 15:42
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vance, Belgium
Age: 62
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Here are 2 incident reports which are worth reading.

The first is about an incident which concerned the very same aircraft and the very same right body gear back on January 21st, 2010.
The aircraft landed on a van.
This is very probably completely unrelated to the present incident, but the coincidence that it concerns the very same landing gear bogie is funny.
https://reports.aviation-safety.net/...744_LX-OCV.pdf

The second incident is a Virgin Atlantic aircraft.
The landing gear concerned is a wing gear but the sequence of events bears some similarities.
It can be noticed that the circumstances that permitted the mistake are still existing today.
https://assets.publishing.service.go...VROM_10-15.pdf
https://aerossurance.com/safety-mana...llation-error/

I bet that several people will have a very thorough look at the gear and gear door actuators of LX-OCV.

Luc Lion is online now  
Old 15th May 2023, 16:25
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Age: 56
Posts: 953
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nicolai
From the comments we can also learn how to say "We can fix that with some speed tape" in French ( c'est réparable avec du duck tape non? )
"bande adhésive de grande vitesse" s'il vous plaît
hans brinker is offline  
Old 15th May 2023, 16:33
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Age: 56
Posts: 953
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XL189
Looks like the same aircraft had a heavy landing a few weeks back, LX-OCV
Originally Posted by BFSGrad
The 4/15/2023 #2 pod strike incident was LX-ECV.
Not a good month for CLX
hans brinker is offline  
Old 15th May 2023, 18:41
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,908
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Does anyone remember a similar incident with a 747 (whatever type)?
atakacs is online now  
Old 15th May 2023, 18:42
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The VS aircraft was a hydraulic problem. Having spoken to a B747-400 pilot who watched the same incident the comment was that the handling pilot had forgotten about the reduced elevator effectiveness in the flare due to the hydraulic failure. It also explained why only part of the undercarriage extended.
tubby linton is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.