Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

United 777 "dives" after takeoff from OGG

Wikiposts
Search
Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

United 777 "dives" after takeoff from OGG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Aug 2023, 08:39
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: France
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AerocatS2A
They managed to turn a pretty innocuous mistake into a near-disaster. I find it interesting that the PF's reaction to impending overspeed during initial climb was to reduce thrust rather than pitch up.
Might be different philosophy since I am low experience and flying on airbus but first reaction would be to use full automation available, be sure to be in proper lateral/vertical mode and select the speed. This taking about 5 seconds.

Maybe they reduced the thrust because a pitch up would cause a really high roc potentially leading to an altitude bust. But even then you can still go, disregard the cleared altitude and do it as you would during an unreliable airspeed climb to MSA if needed.
snl13 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2023, 11:40
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: NC
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by snl13
Might be different philosophy since I am low experience and flying on airbus but first reaction would be to use full automation available, be sure to be in proper lateral/vertical mode and select the speed. This taking about 5 seconds.

Maybe they reduced the thrust because a pitch up would cause a really high roc potentially leading to an altitude bust. But even then you can still go, disregard the cleared altitude and do it as you would during an unreliable airspeed climb to MSA if needed.
Just an observation and not meant to sound "sagey"...I flew early "glass" Boeings and A320...When things got a little hairy I always went manual to put things back in order then reintroduced auto as needed...Worked every time... In spite of the inevitable mistakes and thankfully having flown with a bunch of pros I was very blessed to have been violation/incident/accident free...Many FSAPs, however, were generated just in case......
1southernman is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2023, 12:10
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: France
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1southernman
Just an observation and not meant to sound "sagey"...I flew early "glass" Boeings and A320...When things got a little hairy I always went manual to put things back in order then reintroduced auto as needed...Worked every time... In spite of the inevitable mistakes and thankfully having flown with a bunch of pros I was very blessed to have been violation/incident/accident free...Many FSAPs, however, were generated just in case......
I fully agree if you intend to ‘fly the plane’ but if it’s keeping everything manual and at the same time go nose down in a critical phase of flight I would not feel confortable and that’s against everything I have been taught during my PPL/CPL and then type rating (and since I have low experience I can only rely on that).
snl13 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2023, 13:04
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: NC
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by snl13
I fully agree if you intend to ‘fly the plane’ but if it’s keeping everything manual and at the same time go nose down in a critical phase of flight I would not feel confortable and that’s against everything I have been taught during my PPL/CPL and then type rating (and since I have low experience I can only rely on that).
Mmm...Yep fly the plane is the goal... You should do it however you're taught and comfortable with...Anyway I don't have a dog in the hunt anymore so I'm now going outside and play....Blue skies and stay safe...
1southernman is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2023, 14:27
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Noted one inconsistency between the NTSB final report and the NTSB form 6120.1: Former lists the captain’s time in type as 500; latter lists captain’s time in type as 5,000 (also lists PIC time in type as 300).
BFSGrad is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2023, 02:52
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,947
Received 394 Likes on 209 Posts
Noted one inconsistency between the NTSB final report and the NTSB form 6120.1
Inconsistencies are sometimes found in their documentation, nothing new I'm afraid.
megan is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2023, 12:39
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I fully agree if you intend to ‘fly the plane’ but if it’s keeping everything manual and at the same time go nose down in a critical phase of flight I would not feel confortable and that’s against everything I have been taught during my PPL/CPL and then type rating (and since I have low experience I can only rely on that).
Have they taught you not to pitch down while in manual flight?
172_driver is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2023, 15:01
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: France
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 172_driver
Have they taught you not to pitch down while in manual flight?
yes only up, until I reach the sun.

More seriously I meant not to switch focus to something else than looking outside/instrument scanning and so avoid situations like this where the plane go in such a nose down attitude / vertical rate / loss of SAW.
snl13 is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2023, 15:07
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by megan
Inconsistencies are sometimes found in their documentation, nothing new I'm afraid.
I mentioned that discrepancy because there were some initial rumors that both pilots were relatively low time-in-type. Assuming the 6120.1 data is accurate, the captain had considerable 777 experience but was a relatively new 777 captain, while the FO was relatively low time-in-type.
BFSGrad is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2023, 21:37
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SoCal
Age: 65
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UA1722 777

Originally Posted by AerocatS2A
They managed to turn a pretty innocuous mistake into a near-disaster. I find it interesting that the PF's reaction to impending overspeed during initial climb was to reduce thrust rather than pitch up.
Yeah, that was exactly my question-- How siutationally unaware was the PF to reduce thrust without understanding the big picture. On climb-out? It's a confusing choice of control inputs.
TachyonID is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2023, 04:31
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,102
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Does the B777 pitch down with a reduction of thrust when flying manually or does its FBW compensate? Could that have exacerbated the descent?

Disregard, I see from the FCOM that it compensates.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2023, 13:13
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: London
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see similarities between this incident and the Emirates 777 botched takeoff in Dubai. Perfect aircraft, alert and trained crew just sitting there watching a complete mess unfold and doing nothing at all until a well developed unsafe condition exists.

Tip of the iceberg I reckon.
Rick2023 is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2023, 21:55
  #93 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by Capn Bloggs
NTSB final report via Flightradar 24:
https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/w...nal_Report.pdf
Worth noting that there's no mention of a stall in the NTSB report.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2023, 03:43
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 313
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
This all happened because of confusion about the flaps setting. Did the PNF confirm what he heard verbally. 99.9% of the time it's the same action, just one step, done. In this case it was supposed to be two steps.
RickNRoll is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2023, 06:33
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,102
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Worth noting that there's no mention of a stall in the NTSB report.
No, because he selected Flap 15 instead of 5 which is a "safe" setting in terms of inadvertent stall. It all happened because the Captain stopped flying the plane when he got distracted by the fact the flaps didn't go to where he expected them to.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2023, 06:55
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 313
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by AerocatS2A
No, because he selected Flap 15 instead of 5 which is a "safe" setting in terms of inadvertent stall. It all happened because the Captain stopped flying the plane when he got distracted by the fact the flaps didn't go to where he expected them to.
He was distracted because there was an overspeed warning and he didn't know why. He had to check everything including flaps.
RickNRoll is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2023, 08:57
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somerset
Posts: 67
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
NTSB docket

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=106734
Watson1963 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2023, 13:06
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: NC
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very dynamic event with a big loss of SA...Would've been beneficial to have CVR but the crew seemed forthcoming and the data tells the story pretty well...Eventually the crew retrained and went back to the line...If there were issues, current or past, with them individually (training, etc.) hopefully it was addressed...I assume they are better for it and the rest of us can learn from it...
1southernman is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2023, 01:23
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Here, there, and everywhere
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by AerocatS2A
No, because he selected Flap 15 instead of 5 which is a "safe" setting in terms of inadvertent stall. It all happened because the Captain stopped flying the plane when he got distracted by the fact the flaps didn't go to where he expected them to.
Originally Posted by RickNRoll
He was distracted because there was an overspeed warning and he didn't know why. He had to check everything including flaps.
I disagree with the second quoted statement. Just continue flying the aircraft and don't let the speed exceed the maximum allowable. That would mean continuing to look at the PFD and pitching the nose up enough to keep the speed from getting too high. If one needs to 'check everything', they can simply engage the autopilot, ensure the automatics are operating as desired and then start looking around. In addition, the speed tape on the PFD which the pilot should be looking at will be giving information about what flap setting has been selected.

As for the F/O, he should be looking at the flap lever when the flaps are being selected. Then it is highly unlikely that the wrong selection will be made. PF says 'Flaps 5", PM says 'Flaps 5" then looks at the flaps lever while reaching for it and ensures that it goes to the proper detent. Then look at the flap indicator and see that it changes to an amber 5, confirming proper selection. Then look back at the PFD. All takes about three seconds.

Last edited by punkalouver; 22nd Aug 2023 at 03:20.
punkalouver is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2023, 01:29
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 313
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by 1southernman
Very dynamic event with a big loss of SA...Would've been beneficial to have CVR but the crew seemed forthcoming and the data tells the story pretty well...Eventually the crew retrained and went back to the line...If there were issues, current or past, with them individually (training, etc.) hopefully it was addressed...I assume they are better for it and the rest of us can learn from it...
What did the training teach them that they missed?
RickNRoll is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.