Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Twin Down in Florida

Old 24th Feb 2019, 21:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 152
Unhappy Twin Down in Florida

Poorly written article without much information, but it's early. R.I.P. the pilot. Edited to reflect additional information.

Pilot Dies - Student Pilot and Eight Persons on Ground Survive

- Ed

Last edited by cavuman1; 24th Feb 2019 at 21:18. Reason: Add Information
cavuman1 is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2019, 22:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 9,624


United Consultants Twin Bee

Looks like a re-engined example.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2019, 23:42
  #3 (permalink)  

SkyGod
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA
Age: 62
Posts: 1,452
Flew the same type in Florida years ago getting my twin-sea rating, but not the same N-Number.
Did not like it, unstable and squarly, least favorite of the 50 types in my log book.

The Twin-Bee is an answer to a question not asked..

TowerDog is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2019, 06:09
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: closer to hell
Age: 47
Posts: 890
Originally Posted by TowerDog View Post
Flew the same type in Florida years ago getting my twin-sea rating, but not the same N-Number.
Same...in Winterhaven too.
I thought it was fun to fly.
VMCA demonstration?
troppo is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2019, 08:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,553
another demonstration of what happens when rudder effectiveness ends, and asymmetric thrust takes over directional control (lack thereof). I watched one of those crash in San Diego many moons ago at Brown Field, it wound up in the stage one pond of a sewage treatment plant...fortunately somebody in the front snatched the power off of the operating engine and heaved back on the controls, it landed flat with little forward motion, the two fellows inside said the worst part was knowing what was in the pond, and having to drop into it
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2019, 09:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Timbukthree
Posts: 5,891
The Twin-Bee wasn't the answer, neither was this: The failed Canadian development of the Republic RC-3 Franklin powered amphibian. Heard of it? The "new" See-Bee would be known as the Trident Tri-gull Amphibian. Aerodynamic improvements (and some hydrodynamic improvements) aside, it was powered by the dubious Continental Tiara 6-cyl, 285 hp, 406 cu. in. horizontally opposed air-cooled engine. Ultimately, it was a failed marketing attempt, resulting in huge dollar losses to investors and some losses to the public in the form of tax payer money.

What could we do now to the See-Bee, with existing engine technology? Is the basic design marketable?

Last edited by evansb; 25th Feb 2019 at 09:39.
evansb is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2019, 09:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Off the map
Posts: 986
I'd rather get a Riviera:

DirtyProp is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2019, 23:57
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,555
One prop feathered, simulated or actual engine failure.

https://www.avweb.com/eletter/archiv...t=email#232342
megan is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2019, 00:35
  #9 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 58
Posts: 3,914
I have not flown a Twinbee, though the though of an aircraft which could be flying at 3800 pounds on 180HP un nerves me. Knowing that that aircraft has the aerodynamics of a flying boat is more worrisome. I have lots of light flying boat time, and they are always an aerodynamic compromise. I trust that the instructor was very experienced with single engine ops in this aircraft, but it must require a lot of skill! I think of flying a loaded Cessna 207 at less than two thirds power, and that would be symmetrical! I guess that it would be similar to a Twin Comanche on one engine, other than a Twin Comanche is pretty aerodynamic, and optimized for single engined flying - and still has a reputation!

Interestingly, in Canada I have a multi engine seaplane rating, though I never trained on a multi engine seaplane. The combination of a multi landplane, and seaplane rating, combine to cover multi seaplanes without additional training. That's probably a good thing, because aside from the Twinbee, and Aztec on floats, other multi engined seaplanes are much more capable on one engine. I think that training single engine flying in a low power twin amphibian is a risk without commensurate benefit.
Pilot DAR is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2019, 11:20
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: California
Age: 59
Posts: 170
Having flown both Seabees and twin bees, by far the best is the gm v8 powered model. Unfortunately the FAA did not like the idea of taking a certified aircraft an calling it amateur built......

About Us - The Horizon Aircraft Team | Horizon Aircraft
slatch is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.