Originally Posted by
toilet flush
The latest API website has the following
WHEN THE UNEXPECTED HAPPENS - RAN OVER DURING PREFLIGHT WALK-AROUND
toilet flush of the sixteen individuals comments you posted only seven of those received benefit, one didn't qualify as his condition was excluding and the remaining are merely commenting "niceties" on admin response time...wow! thats plain misleading. Can you tell the world why have 80 % of the LIPS API board members you mention in your cut and paste "no bad press allowed" ad resigned from the LIPS API board. The answer to the question in your post title is duly answered in a previous post by Gardenshed as detailed below.
Originally Posted by
gardenshed
Except the problem wasn't pre-existing. It is a completely different issue.
HW are using it as a tenuous link to deny.
Guys the case is heading to court, the consultant on the case stated that he spent about 25% of his professional time writing up reports to prove that this get of jail cause, used by many insurance agencies are false.
Have a read of the attached page and see if you can join up the dots ... . . . . . . . if you need help at joining up the dots an answer sheet version will be here before Santa drops by...... . . . . . . . . . please be assured a live human Santa wrote this post and will respond.