although the author of the said article on the aopa forum has the right to ask such questions it must not be assumed that he is correct (as he says "I am not a lawyer") – yes the agm was interesting to say the least but i don’t believe there was any choice if the association was to go forward – the issues raised are now with respect history and although i don’t suggest that they should not be answered at this time there are far more critical things for the aopa board to address – in terms of the election there was no choice as the previous committee and its leadership did not deliver the goods - in fact they almost sold the whole show out the back door regardless of where you put the subs paid in advance – only with this board is there any chance for aopa to survive and provide ga with the representation it rightly deserves – aopa deserves to have a respected board and not one that leaks or perhaps more correctly one with members that leak – it serves no good whatsoever