Hello there DoT........something like that, whose counting anyways
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G'day DonQuixote23...........bingo
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hoy RVDT.......it's all visual ops up in the heavens for what we're doing so it's all lookin' at them thar big peaks
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning John....yes Your right Mate, we are basically setting a QNH referencing off the already known heights & comparing them with the GPS which both ring true & match. As it is all visual the altimeter doesn't mean that much, it's eyeballing that carries the greater weight.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Right fadecdegraded.....this baby has landed on Everest twice & traveled to the outer realms of Earth's atmosphere. Sure as hell wouldn't wanna be exceeding Ng or T4 or Torque (errr torque, forgotten what that is). But service ceiling & performance is really more about the Pilot not the RFM which can be waaaay out up there
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Namaste ScotiaQ........I doubt going >23,K' is gonna break anything unless the PIC does sumting shtooopid which is just as easily possible <23,K'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi toptobottom....yep sure have, lots of important stuff missing like highest accident rate World wide, highest insurance premiums World wide, EASA & ICAO black banns in place for years & still! cheapest charter rates around with those insurance premiums with undercutting, price gauging, competition errr, nuff said here
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
