Originally Posted by
tmmorris
Why is it that so many procedures require conventional aids for the missed approach?
I heard a claim it's because setting up a new hold (eg at one of the RNAV IAFs) would require an ACP (airspace change proposal) to be done, but not sure on the truth of that.
I guess also for airfields having all traffic using the same holding fix regardless of what approach they're wanting to do might make procedural separation easier etc?