Originally Posted by
Capot
No fireworks....but I would accept his lawyer's assertion that
Deliberately false promises that if you pay X you will get Y, when what you actually get is nothing of the sort, are cynical frauds and I hope the perpetrator gets dumped on, if only to discourage the practice.
But to say he got "nothing of the sort" isn't remotely true.
What he actually got was
something of the sort. Maybe not what precisely was advertised, but hardly a massive difference either.
I wonder how much he’s suing for? If it’s for the entire cost of the holiday I guess he’ll have to prove that he specifically booked that particular package just because he thought a glass of champagne was thrown in. Good luck with that……
I suppose in an ideal world he ought to be awarded the difference in cost between a glass of champagne and a glass of sparkling wine, but be made to bear his own legal costs.