The way CASA seem to go about implementing rules is:
- Publish an incomprehensible NPRM buried in amongst so many rule changes so that the people affected by the change don't know that it is coming.
- Ignore any comments received or worse integrate them poorly into the original proposal so that outcome is more onerous than it would have originally been.
- Implement proposed instruments and amendments.
- Sit back and wait. If done well someone else (in this case airservices) does the dirty work and cops the flack when the rules are followed through.
- CASA saves the day by issuing an exemption to the new rule.
We are just waiting on 5 to happen here.
I suspect that we are at step 1 with NPRM 1426AS, "Post-implementation review of the legislative framework for Part 139 - Aerodromes".
https://consultation.casa.gov.au/reg.../consult_view/
It sounds OK but what is the devil in the detail??? Will this result in further airport costs of compliance and therefore closures...