Ixixly, you'd be mistaken
Leadsled,
Let's just say that if I sat down with you over a beer I'm sure we'd both end up in fierce agreeance. I think your frustrations at Airservices are misguided. They have no obligations and are doing what they are allowed to do under the regs. It's the reg and CASA mindset that has to change first.
Do I like Airservices attitude toward the whole thing? No. Do I agree with reg as written? Not entirely. But there are still major airports that don't/can't/won't hand over important infrastructure information which can and does compromise safety. Should they be penalised for it? Not initially, but how long do you let it remain an issue and how else do you get them to hand it over? Some aerodrome operators in ERSA/DAP don't even know they have responsibility for an aerodrome.
Why I stated that I didn't think you knew what you were talking about was because if you understood the reg framework you wouldn't have come out all guns blazing at AsA. Part 175 requires them to do what they are doing.
Alpha