We get the OPs point, it's just poorly researched and badly thought out
aplucas, the OP, having done what appears to be enough research to know there's law covering this has the then decided to go off writing to those in high office than continuing his research.
This suggests anything but an objective approach. An objective approach involves taking a broad view of the topic and reading multiple sources and assessing them for validity rather than half doing it and shooting off on a forum.
And 30seconds of research will tell you that exceptional canditates of any gender also get considered for financial support which takes the initiative from discrimination to positive action which a further minute googling will inform you, is specifically allowed and encouraged in the law.
I will once again repeat my belief that the OP has been recently rejected and I'll add that with this kind of attitude I'd hazard that's a good thing.
Last edited by Pizzacake; 15th Oct 2017 at 19:43.
Reason: Spelling